Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case Commentaries

Interpretation of DEPB Sale Proceeds under Section 28(iiid) in Topman Exports v. Income-tax Officer

Interpretation of DEPB Sale Proceeds under Section 28(iiid) in Topman Exports v. Income-tax Officer

Date: Aug 12, 2009
Interpretation of DEPB Sale Proceeds under Section 28(iiid) in Topman Exports v. Income-tax Officer Introduction The case of M/s Topman Exports v. Income-tax Officer (OSD), 14(2), Mumbai adjudicated...
Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Key Precedents and Legal Insights

Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Key Precedents and Legal Insights

Date: Aug 7, 2009
Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Key Precedents and Legal Insights Introduction The case of Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Disallowance of Expenditure Under Section 14A: Cheminvest Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer

Disallowance of Expenditure Under Section 14A: Cheminvest Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer

Date: Aug 6, 2009
Disallowance of Expenditure Under Section 14A: Cheminvest Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer Introduction The case of Cheminvest Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 3(3), New Delhi adjudicated by the Income Tax...
Intention Determines Tax Classification: Capital Gains vs Business Income in Ward 33(4), New Delhi v. Rohit Anand

Intention Determines Tax Classification: Capital Gains vs Business Income in Ward 33(4), New Delhi v. Rohit Anand

Date: Aug 1, 2009
Intention Determines Tax Classification: Capital Gains vs Business Income in Ward 33(4), New Delhi v. Rohit Anand Introduction The case of Income Tax Officer, Ward 33(4), New Delhi v. Rohit Anand...
ITAT Clarifies Derivative Transactions as Speculative under Section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act and Prospective Nature of Finance Act Amendments

ITAT Clarifies Derivative Transactions as Speculative under Section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act and Prospective Nature of Finance Act Amendments

Date: Aug 1, 2009
ITAT Clarifies Derivative Transactions as Speculative under Section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act and Prospective Nature of Finance Act Amendments Introduction The case of Shree Capital Services Ltd....
Burden of Proof in Assessing Genuine Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Smt. Kusum Lata Thakral v. CIT

Burden of Proof in Assessing Genuine Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Smt. Kusum Lata Thakral v. CIT

Date: Jul 25, 2009
Burden of Proof in Assessing Genuine Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Smt. Kusum Lata Thakral v. Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Smt. Kusum Lata Thakral v. Commissioner of...
Assessment Orders Barred by Limitation Period: Shanti Lal Godawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Assessment Orders Barred by Limitation Period: Shanti Lal Godawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 25, 2009
Assessment Orders Barred by Limitation Period: Shanti Lal Godawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Shanti Lal Godawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax...
Tribunal Upholds Procedural Integrity in Tata Communications Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Tribunal Upholds Procedural Integrity in Tata Communications Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jul 11, 2009
Tribunal Upholds Procedural Integrity in Tata Communications Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Case Citation: Tata Communications Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range 1,...
Determination of Annual Letting Value Under Section 23: Insights from Income-tax Officer v. Baker Technical Services (P.) Ltd.

Determination of Annual Letting Value Under Section 23: Insights from Income-tax Officer v. Baker Technical Services (P.) Ltd.

Date: Jul 7, 2009
Determination of Annual Letting Value Under Section 23: Insights from Income-tax Officer v. Baker Technical Services (P.) Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Income-tax Officer v. Baker Technical...
Penalties Under Section 271(1)(c) Affirmed in ITAT Ahmedabad v. Kirit Dahyabhai Patel

Penalties Under Section 271(1)(c) Affirmed in ITAT Ahmedabad v. Kirit Dahyabhai Patel

Date: Jun 26, 2009
Penalties Under Section 271(1)(c) Affirmed in ITAT Ahmedabad v. Kirit Dahyabhai Patel Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, CC-1(3), Ahmedabad v. Kirit Dahyabhai Patel...
Schefenacker Motherson Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Depreciation in Transfer Pricing Analysis

Schefenacker Motherson Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Depreciation in Transfer Pricing Analysis

Date: Jun 12, 2009
Schefenacker Motherson Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer: Depreciation in Transfer Pricing Analysis Introduction The case of Schefenacker Motherson Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer adjudicated by the Income Tax...
Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Tax-Exempt EOUs: Commentary on Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. MSS India (P.) Ltd.

Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Tax-Exempt EOUs: Commentary on Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. MSS India (P.) Ltd.

Date: May 30, 2009
Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Tax-Exempt EOUs: Commentary on Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2, Nashik v. MSS India (P.) Ltd. Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of...
Clarifying Adjusted Book Profits under Section 115JA: The Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT-IV Judgment

Clarifying Adjusted Book Profits under Section 115JA: The Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT-IV Judgment

Date: May 21, 2009
Clarifying Adjusted Book Profits under Section 115JA: The Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT-IV Judgment 1. Introduction The case of Goetze (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax-IV, adjudicated by the...
Reassessment Under Section 147: Limits and Implications Post Block Assessment Challenges

Reassessment Under Section 147: Limits and Implications Post Block Assessment Challenges

Date: May 15, 2009
Reassessment Under Section 147: Limits and Implications Post Block Assessment Challenges Introduction The case of M.P. Ramachandran v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle 8, Mumbai...
Transmission Charges Not Considered "Fees for Technical Services" under Section 194J: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Transmission Charges Not Considered "Fees for Technical Services" under Section 194J: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: May 1, 2009
Transmission Charges Not Considered "Fees for Technical Services" under Section 194J: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Jaipur Vidyut...
Redefining "Housing Project" Eligibility under Section 80-IB: Vandana Properties v. Assistant Commissioner

Redefining "Housing Project" Eligibility under Section 80-IB: Vandana Properties v. Assistant Commissioner

Date: Apr 30, 2009
Redefining "Housing Project" Eligibility under Section 80-IB: Vandana Properties v. Assistant Commissioner Introduction The case of Vandana Properties v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle...
Precedent on Penal Provisions: Kanbay Software India v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Precedent on Penal Provisions: Kanbay Software India v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Apr 29, 2009
Establishing Precedents on Penal Provisions under Section 271(1)(c): Insights from Kanbay Software India v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Kanbay Software India (P.) Ltd....
Rajalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Primacy of Section 40A(7) in Gratuity Provision Deductions

Rajalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Primacy of Section 40A(7) in Gratuity Provision Deductions

Date: Apr 25, 2009
Rajalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Primacy of Section 40A(7) in Gratuity Provision Deductions Introduction The case of Rajalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer,...
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Landmark Ruling on TDS and DTAA Implications

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Landmark Ruling on TDS and DTAA Implications

Date: Apr 10, 2009
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Landmark Ruling on TDS and DTAA Implications Introduction The case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS...
Clarification on Deduction under Section 80-IB (10) for Mixed-Use Housing Projects: Brahma Associates v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Clarification on Deduction under Section 80-IB (10) for Mixed-Use Housing Projects: Brahma Associates v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Clarification on Deduction under Section 80-IB (10) for Mixed-Use Housing Projects Brahma Associates v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD), Circle 4, Pune Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert