Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Gauhati High Court Case Commentaries

Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance Introduction The case of M/S Jumbo Roofing and Tiles v. Union of India and 3 Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act Introduction In the landmark case M/S. Bulland Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India and 4 Ors., the...
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India Introduction In the landmark case of Topcem India, Rep By Sri. Arun Kejriwal v. Union Of India, Rep. By The Secretary To...
Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam

Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam Introduction Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam, decided by the Gauhati High...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam"

Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam"

Date: Jan 31, 2020
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam" Introduction The case of Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam emerged...
Burden of Proof and Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from Krishna Chetry v. State Of Assam

Burden of Proof and Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from Krishna Chetry v. State Of Assam

Date: Jan 10, 2020
Burden of Proof and Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from Krishna Chetry v. State Of Assam Introduction The case of Krishna Chetry v. State Of Assam And Another adjudicated by the Gauhati High Court...
ONGC v. Union of India: Establishing Employment Status of Contract Labour in Perennial Operations

ONGC v. Union of India: Establishing Employment Status of Contract Labour in Perennial Operations

Date: Jan 8, 2019
ONGC v. Union of India: Establishing Employment Status of Contract Labour in Perennial Operations Introduction The case of Oil And Natural Gas Corporation v. Union Of India And Ors., adjudicated by...
Establishing the Right to Pension for Muster Roll Workers Without Arbitrary Service Deductions – Gauhati High Court Decision in Sanjita Roy v. State of Assam

Establishing the Right to Pension for Muster Roll Workers Without Arbitrary Service Deductions – Gauhati High Court Decision in Sanjita Roy v. State of Assam

Date: Dec 5, 2018
Establishing the Right to Pension for Muster Roll Workers Without Arbitrary Service Deductions – Gauhati High Court Decision in Sanjita Roy v. State of Assam Introduction The case of Sanjita Roy v....
Gauhati High Court Sets Precedent on Interest Subsidy Eligibility under NEIIPP, 2007

Gauhati High Court Sets Precedent on Interest Subsidy Eligibility under NEIIPP, 2007

Date: May 23, 2018
Gauhati High Court Sets Precedent on Interest Subsidy Eligibility under NEIIPP, 2007 Introduction The case of Pdp Steels Ltd. v. Union Of India And Ors. heard by the Gauhati High Court on May 22,...
Gauhati High Court Upholds Fixed Pay Scale and Res Judicata in OBB Teacher Regularization Case

Gauhati High Court Upholds Fixed Pay Scale and Res Judicata in OBB Teacher Regularization Case

Date: Apr 13, 2018
Gauhati High Court Upholds Fixed Pay Scale and Res Judicata in OBB Teacher Regularization Case Introduction The case of BINOY KUMAR NATH and 64 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS was adjudicated by...
Interpretation of "From Eighty Years" in Pension Eligibility for Retired High Court Judges – Virendra Dutt Gyani v. Union of India And Ors.

Interpretation of "From Eighty Years" in Pension Eligibility for Retired High Court Judges – Virendra Dutt Gyani v. Union of India And Ors.

Date: Mar 16, 2018
Interpretation of "From Eighty Years" in Pension Eligibility for Retired High Court Judges Virendra Dutt Gyani v. Union Of India And Ors. – Gauhati High Court, 2018 Introduction The case of Virendra...
Non-Regularization of Muster Roll and Work Charged Workers: Insights from State Of Assam v. Upen Das

Non-Regularization of Muster Roll and Work Charged Workers: Insights from State Of Assam v. Upen Das

Date: Jun 9, 2017
Non-Regularization of Muster Roll and Work Charged Workers: Insights from State Of Assam v. Upen Das Introduction The case of State Of Assam v. Upen Das adjudicated by the Gauhati High Court on June...
Shiv Shakti Flour Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Transport Subsidy Classified as Capital Receipt

Shiv Shakti Flour Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Transport Subsidy Classified as Capital Receipt

Date: Nov 30, 2016
Transport Subsidy Classified as Capital Receipt: Comprehensive Analysis of Shiv Shakti Flour Mills v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Shiv Shakti Flour Mills (P.) Ltd. v....
Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Golap Lata Goswami And Anr. v. Ajit Deka And Ors.

Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Golap Lata Goswami And Anr. v. Ajit Deka And Ors.

Date: Apr 8, 2016
Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Golap Lata Goswami And Anr. v. Ajit Deka And Ors. Introduction The case of Golap Lata Goswami And Anr. v. Ajit Deka And Ors. adjudicated by the...
Upholding Constitutional Due Process in Probationer Dismissals: Prasanta Kalita v. Gauhati High Court

Upholding Constitutional Due Process in Probationer Dismissals: Prasanta Kalita v. Gauhati High Court

Date: Jan 30, 2016
Upholding Constitutional Due Process in Probationer Dismissals: Prasanta Kalita v. Gauhati High Court Introduction The case of Prasanta Kalita v. Gauhati High Court And Anr., adjudicated by the...
Pranab Kumar Deka v. State of Assam: Unconstitutional Age Relaxation in Government Recruitment

Pranab Kumar Deka v. State of Assam: Unconstitutional Age Relaxation in Government Recruitment

Date: Aug 4, 2015
Pranab Kumar Deka v. State of Assam: Unconstitutional Age Relaxation in Government Recruitment Introduction In the landmark case of Pranab Kumar Deka and Ors. v. State Of Assam And Ors., the Gauhati...
Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors.

Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors.

Date: Mar 20, 2015
Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors. Introduction The case of Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam...
Affirmation of Promissory Estoppel in Government Industrial Policy Modifications

Affirmation of Promissory Estoppel in Government Industrial Policy Modifications

Date: Nov 21, 2014
Affirmation of Promissory Estoppel in Government Industrial Policy Modifications Introduction The case Union Of India And Ors. v. Kamakhya Cosmetics And Pharmaceuticals Ltd. And Ors. adjudicated by...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Rigorous Scrutiny for Capital Gains and Undisclosed Income Transactions

Gauhati High Court Establishes Rigorous Scrutiny for Capital Gains and Undisclosed Income Transactions

Date: Nov 7, 2013
Gauhati High Court Establishes Rigorous Scrutiny for Capital Gains and Undisclosed Income Transactions Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sanghamitra Bharali adjudicated by the...
Separation of Judiciary from Executive in Tribal Areas: Gauhati High Court's Landmark Decision

Separation of Judiciary from Executive in Tribal Areas: Gauhati High Court's Landmark Decision

Date: Sep 17, 2013
Separation of Judiciary from Executive in Tribal Areas: Gauhati High Court's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of Registrar General Of Gauhati High Court v. Union Of India And Ors. adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert