Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Judicial Restraint in Employment Law: Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Judicial Restraint in Employment Law: Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Date: Apr 1, 1958
Judicial Restraint in Employment Law: Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Introduction The case of Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. v. Regional Provident...
Ensuring Natural Justice in Departmental Proceedings: Insights from Amulya Kumar Sikdar v. L.M Bakshi And Ors.

Ensuring Natural Justice in Departmental Proceedings: Insights from Amulya Kumar Sikdar v. L.M Bakshi And Ors.

Date: Mar 25, 1958
Ensuring Natural Justice in Departmental Proceedings: Insights from Amulya Kumar Sikdar v. L.M Bakshi And Ors. Introduction The case of Amulya Kumar Sikdar v. L.M Bakshi And Ors. was adjudicated by...
Invalid Reconstitution of Arbitral Court in Baranagore Jute Factory Co. Ltd. v. Messrs. Hulaschand Rupchand: Implications for Arbitration Proceedings

Invalid Reconstitution of Arbitral Court in Baranagore Jute Factory Co. Ltd. v. Messrs. Hulaschand Rupchand: Implications for Arbitration Proceedings

Date: Mar 11, 1958
Invalid Reconstitution of Arbitral Court in Baranagore Jute Factory Co. Ltd. v. Messrs. Hulaschand Rupchand: Implications for Arbitration Proceedings Introduction The case of Baranagore Jute Factory...
Doctrine of De Facto Directors in Share Transfer: Insights from Albert Judah Judah v. Rampada Gupta And Anr.

Doctrine of De Facto Directors in Share Transfer: Insights from Albert Judah Judah v. Rampada Gupta And Anr.

Date: Mar 4, 1958
Doctrine of De Facto Directors in Share Transfer: Insights from Albert Judah Judah v. Rampada Gupta And Anr. Introduction The case of Albert Judah Judah v. Rampada Gupta And Anr. adjudicated by the...
Industrial Tribunal Jurisdiction over Co-operative Societies: Insights from Co-Operative Milk Societies Union Ltd. v. State Of West Bengal (1958)

Industrial Tribunal Jurisdiction over Co-operative Societies: Insights from Co-Operative Milk Societies Union Ltd. v. State Of West Bengal (1958)

Date: Mar 4, 1958
Industrial Tribunal Jurisdiction over Co-operative Societies: Insights from Co-Operative Milk Societies Union Ltd. v. State Of West Bengal (1958) 1. Introduction The case of Co-Operative Milk...
Clarification on the Maintainability of Appeals Under Section 417(3) of CrPC: Sk Osman Gani v. Baramdeo Singh And Ors.

Clarification on the Maintainability of Appeals Under Section 417(3) of CrPC: Sk Osman Gani v. Baramdeo Singh And Ors.

Date: Mar 1, 1958
Clarification on the Maintainability of Appeals Under Section 417(3) of CrPC: Sk Osman Gani v. Baramdeo Singh And Ors. Introduction The case of Sk Osman Gani v. Baramdeo Singh And Ors. adjudicated by...
Minimum Age Requirement for Legislative Assembly Candidature: An Analysis of Jagadananda Roy v. Rabindranath Sikdar And Ors.

Minimum Age Requirement for Legislative Assembly Candidature: An Analysis of Jagadananda Roy v. Rabindranath Sikdar And Ors.

Date: Feb 19, 1958
Minimum Age Requirement for Legislative Assembly Candidature: An Analysis of Jagadananda Roy v. Rabindranath Sikdar And Ors. Introduction Case Title: Jagadananda Roy v. Rabindranath Sikdar And Ors....
Timely Notice Requirement Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Analysis of Union Of India v. Meghraj Agarwalla (1958)

Timely Notice Requirement Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Analysis of Union Of India v. Meghraj Agarwalla (1958)

Date: Feb 12, 1958
Timely Notice Requirement Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act: Analysis of Union Of India v. Meghraj Agarwalla (1958) Introduction The case of Union Of India (As Representing The Eastern...
Impact of Partition Suits on Adverse Possession Claims: Achhiman Bibi v. Abdur Rahim Naskar

Impact of Partition Suits on Adverse Possession Claims: Achhiman Bibi v. Abdur Rahim Naskar

Date: Feb 12, 1958
Impact of Partition Suits on Adverse Possession Claims: Achhiman Bibi v. Abdur Rahim Naskar Introduction The case of Achhiman Bibi v. Abdur Rahim Naskar, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Defining 'Workman' Under the Industrial Disputes Act: McLeod & Co. Ltd. v. Sixth Industrial Tribunal

Defining 'Workman' Under the Industrial Disputes Act: McLeod & Co. Ltd. v. Sixth Industrial Tribunal

Date: Feb 11, 1958
Defining 'Workman' Under the Industrial Disputes Act: McLeod & Co. Ltd. v. Sixth Industrial Tribunal Introduction The case McLeod & Co. Ltd. v. Sixth Industrial Tribunal was adjudicated by the...
Clarification of Rule 14(c) in Terminating Temporary Government Service: Anil Nath De v. Collector Of Central Excise

Clarification of Rule 14(c) in Terminating Temporary Government Service: Anil Nath De v. Collector Of Central Excise

Date: Feb 5, 1958
Clarification of Rule 14(c) in Terminating Temporary Government Service: Anil Nath De v. Collector Of Central Excise Introduction The case of Anil Nath De v. Collector Of Central Excise was...
Executability of Scheme Decrees and Joint Possession: Insights from Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Jew v. Jnanendra Nath Ghose

Executability of Scheme Decrees and Joint Possession: Insights from Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Jew v. Jnanendra Nath Ghose

Date: Feb 4, 1958
Executability of Scheme Decrees and Joint Possession: Insights from Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Jew v. Jnanendra Nath Ghose Introduction Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Jew v. Jnanendra Nath Ghose And Others is...
Calcutta High Court Validates Execution of Will Despite Challenges of Antedating and Undue Influence

Calcutta High Court Validates Execution of Will Despite Challenges of Antedating and Undue Influence

Date: Feb 4, 1958
Calcutta High Court Validates Execution of Will Despite Challenges of Antedating and Undue Influence Introduction The case of Earnest Bento Souza v. John Francis Souza And Others adjudicated by the...
Partial Eviction under Proviso (h) of the Rent Control Act: Insights from Krishna Das Nandy v. Bidhan Chandra Roy

Partial Eviction under Proviso (h) of the Rent Control Act: Insights from Krishna Das Nandy v. Bidhan Chandra Roy

Date: Jan 29, 1958
Partial Eviction under Proviso (h) of the Rent Control Act: Insights from Krishna Das Nandy v. Bidhan Chandra Roy Introduction The case of Krishna Das Nandy v. Bidhan Chandra Roy is a landmark...
Clarification on the Applicability of Section 251A CrPC in Cases Instituted by Excise Officers: Premchand Khetry v. The State Opposite Party

Clarification on the Applicability of Section 251A CrPC in Cases Instituted by Excise Officers: Premchand Khetry v. The State Opposite Party

Date: Nov 29, 1957
Clarification on the Applicability of Section 251A CrPC in Cases Instituted by Excise Officers Premchand Khetry v. The State Opposite Party Court: Calcutta High Court Date: November 28, 1957...
Calcutta High Court Clarifies the Applicability of Section 207-A C.P.C. to Calcutta Police Reports

Calcutta High Court Clarifies the Applicability of Section 207-A C.P.C. to Calcutta Police Reports

Date: Nov 29, 1957
Calcutta High Court Clarifies the Applicability of Section 207-A C.P.C. to Calcutta Police Reports Introduction In the landmark case of Manik Chand Chowdhury And Ors. v. The State Opposite Party,...
Establishing Presumptive Service via Registered Post: Insights from Sushil Kumar v. Ganesh Chandra Mitra

Establishing Presumptive Service via Registered Post: Insights from Sushil Kumar v. Ganesh Chandra Mitra

Date: Nov 27, 1957
Establishing Presumptive Service via Registered Post: Insights from Sushil Kumar v. Ganesh Chandra Mitra 1. Introduction The case of Sushil Kumar v. Ganesh Chandra Mitra adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Unconstitutional Delegation and Arbitrary Taxation: Sarat Chandra Ghatak v. Corporation of Calcutta

Unconstitutional Delegation and Arbitrary Taxation: Sarat Chandra Ghatak v. Corporation of Calcutta

Date: Nov 22, 1957
Unconstitutional Delegation and Arbitrary Taxation: Sarat Chandra Ghatak v. Corporation of Calcutta Introduction The case of Sarat Chandra Ghatak And Ors. v. Corporation of Calcutta And Anr.,...
Legal Commentary: Expiry of Suspension Orders in Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. Union Of India

Legal Commentary: Expiry of Suspension Orders in Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. Union Of India

Date: Sep 10, 1957
Legal Commentary: Expiry of Suspension Orders in Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. Union Of India Introduction Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. Union Of India And Others Opposite Parties is a pivotal case...
Scope of S.22(3) on Voluntary Returns and Loss Carry Forward: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Govindalal Dutta

Scope of S.22(3) on Voluntary Returns and Loss Carry Forward: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Govindalal Dutta

Date: Sep 5, 1957
Scope of S.22(3) on Voluntary Returns and Loss Carry Forward: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Govindalal Dutta Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Govindalal Dutta,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert