Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Pramatha Nath Talukdar v. Maharaja Probirendra M. Tagore: Interpretation of Section 30(1) of the Sale of Goods Act in Hypothecation and Court-Sale Context

Pramatha Nath Talukdar v. Maharaja Probirendra M. Tagore: Interpretation of Section 30(1) of the Sale of Goods Act in Hypothecation and Court-Sale Context

Date: Mar 4, 1965
Pramatha Nath Talukdar v. Maharaja Probirendra M. Tagore: Interpretation of Section 30(1) of the Sale of Goods Act in Hypothecation and Court-Sale Context Introduction The case of Pramatha Nath...
Caprihans (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Formica International Ltd.: Clarifying Stay of Proceedings under Section 111 of the Trade Marks Act

Caprihans (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Formica International Ltd.: Clarifying Stay of Proceedings under Section 111 of the Trade Marks Act

Date: Feb 24, 1965
Caprihans (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Formica International Ltd.: Clarifying Stay of Proceedings under Section 111 of the Trade Marks Act Introduction Caprihans (India) Private Ltd. v. Formica International...
Signature Requirement on Notices under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act: Insights from B.K Gooyee v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Signature Requirement on Notices under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act: Insights from B.K Gooyee v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 6, 1965
Signature Requirement on Notices under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act: Insights from B.K Gooyee v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of B.K Gooyee v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Tea Estates India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax: Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act

Tea Estates India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax: Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act

Date: Jan 30, 1965
Tea Estates India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax: Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act 1. Introduction Tea Estates India Private Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, West...
Adoption of Written Down Value in Wealth Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta v. Tungabhadra Industries Ltd.

Adoption of Written Down Value in Wealth Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta v. Tungabhadra Industries Ltd.

Date: Jan 30, 1965
Adoption of Written Down Value in Wealth Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta v. Tungabhadra Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax,...
Abatement of Appeals in Writ Proceedings: Precedents and Implications from Krishnalal Sadhu v. State of West Bengal

Abatement of Appeals in Writ Proceedings: Precedents and Implications from Krishnalal Sadhu v. State of West Bengal

Date: Jan 28, 1965
Abatement of Appeals in Writ Proceedings: Precedents and Implications from Krishnalal Sadhu v. State of West Bengal Introduction The case of Krishnalal Sadhu And Others v. State Of West Bengal And...
Kishan Rathi v. Mondal Bros. & Co.: Upholding the Principle of Apparent Authority in Company Law

Kishan Rathi v. Mondal Bros. & Co.: Upholding the Principle of Apparent Authority in Company Law

Date: Jan 28, 1965
Kishan Rathi v. Mondal Bros. & Co.: Upholding the Principle of Apparent Authority in Company Law Introduction The case of Kishan Rathi v. Mondal Bros. & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. & Anr. adjudicated by the...
Affirming Tribunal's Expertise: High Court Upholds Findings on Bona Fide Retrenchment in Parry’s Employees' Union v. Parry And Co. Ltd.

Affirming Tribunal's Expertise: High Court Upholds Findings on Bona Fide Retrenchment in Parry’s Employees' Union v. Parry And Co. Ltd.

Date: Dec 24, 1964
Affirming Tribunal's Expertise: High Court Upholds Findings on Bona Fide Retrenchment in Parry’s Employees' Union v. Parry And Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Parry’s (Calcutta) Employees’ Union v....
Non-Saleability of Compensation Rights under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act: Commentary on Abdul Khaleque v. Medaswar Hossain

Non-Saleability of Compensation Rights under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act: Commentary on Abdul Khaleque v. Medaswar Hossain

Date: Dec 19, 1964
Non-Saleability of Compensation Rights under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act: Commentary on Abdul Khaleque v. Medaswar Hossain Introduction The legal landscape surrounding property...
Capitalised Value of Wakf Income Rights as Wealth-Taxable Assets: Analysis of Ahmed G.H Ariff v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta (1964)

Capitalised Value of Wakf Income Rights as Wealth-Taxable Assets: Analysis of Ahmed G.H Ariff v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta (1964)

Date: Dec 5, 1964
Capitalised Value of Wakf Income Rights as Wealth-Taxable Assets: Analysis of Ahmed G.H Ariff v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Calcutta (1964) Introduction The case of Ahmed G.H Ariff v. Commissioner...
Service of Ejectment Notice Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: Hare Krishna Das v. Messrs. Hahnemann Publishing Co. Ltd.

Service of Ejectment Notice Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: Hare Krishna Das v. Messrs. Hahnemann Publishing Co. Ltd.

Date: Nov 28, 1964
Service of Ejectment Notice Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: Hare Krishna Das v. Messrs. Hahnemann Publishing Co. Ltd. Introduction Parties Involved: The appellant in this case is Hare Krishna...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Procedural Integrity in Granting Interim Relief under Companies Act, 1956

Calcutta High Court Upholds Procedural Integrity in Granting Interim Relief under Companies Act, 1956

Date: Sep 23, 1964
Calcutta High Court Upholds Procedural Integrity in Granting Interim Relief under Companies Act, 1956 Introduction The case of Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Ltd., In Re adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Sovereign Immunity in Civil Litigation: Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation v. Monorama Meher Singh Legha & Ors.

Sovereign Immunity in Civil Litigation: Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation v. Monorama Meher Singh Legha & Ors.

Date: Sep 12, 1964
Sovereign Immunity in Civil Litigation: Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation v. Monorama Meher Singh Legha & Ors. Introduction The case of Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation v. Monorama Meher Singh Legha &...
Ensuring Reasonable Opportunity for the Assessee: Insights from Srimati Kiron Devi Singhee v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Ensuring Reasonable Opportunity for the Assessee: Insights from Srimati Kiron Devi Singhee v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jul 9, 1964
Ensuring Reasonable Opportunity for the Assessee: Insights from Srimati Kiron Devi Singhee v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Srimati Kiron Devi Singhee v. Commissioner Of...
Bagsu Devi Bafna v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Natural Justice in Income Tax Revisions

Bagsu Devi Bafna v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Natural Justice in Income Tax Revisions

Date: Jul 7, 1964
Bagsu Devi Bafna v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Reinforcing Natural Justice in Income Tax Revisions Introduction The case of Bagsu Devi Bafna v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors. was adjudicated by...
Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: The Landmark Decision in Trick v. Regent Oil Co. Ltd.

Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: The Landmark Decision in Trick v. Regent Oil Co. Ltd.

Date: Jun 9, 1964
Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: The Landmark Decision in Trick v. Regent Oil Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Trick (Inspector of Taxes) v. Regent Oil Co. Ltd., decided by the Calcutta High Court...
Calcutta High Court Rules on Limitations of Section 155: Allotment in Severalty Not Permissible in Rectification of Share Register

Calcutta High Court Rules on Limitations of Section 155: Allotment in Severalty Not Permissible in Rectification of Share Register

Date: Jun 6, 1964
Calcutta High Court Rules on Limitations of Section 155: Allotment in Severalty Not Permissible in Rectification of Share Register Introduction The case of Sm. Hemlata Saha v. Stadmed Private Ltd. &...
Appeal Against Order Under Section 151 CPC Not Maintainable: Nanalal Varma & Co. v. Gordhandas

Appeal Against Order Under Section 151 CPC Not Maintainable: Nanalal Varma & Co. v. Gordhandas

Date: May 23, 1964
Appeal Against Order Under Section 151 CPC Not Maintainable: M/S. Nanalal M. Varma & Co. v. Gordhandas Introduction The case M/S. Nanalal M. Varma And Co. (Gunnies) P. Ltd. v. Gordhandas Jerambhai...
Estoppel in Arbitration: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalmia Iron and Steel Ltd.

Estoppel in Arbitration: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalmia Iron and Steel Ltd.

Date: May 20, 1964
Estoppel in Arbitration: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalmia Iron and Steel Ltd. Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalmia Iron and Steel Ltd. adjudicated by...
Surendranath Paul v. Union of India: Guidelines on Arbitrator Appointment and Continuity

Surendranath Paul v. Union of India: Guidelines on Arbitrator Appointment and Continuity

Date: Apr 30, 1964
Surendranath Paul v. Union of India: Guidelines on Arbitrator Appointment and Continuity Introduction In the landmark case of Surendranath Paul v. Union of India, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert