Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Seniority in Public Service Not Enforceable Under Article 226: A Comprehensive Commentary on Arun Kumar Bhattacharjee v. State of West Bengal

Seniority in Public Service Not Enforceable Under Article 226: A Comprehensive Commentary on Arun Kumar Bhattacharjee v. State of West Bengal

Date: Jul 20, 1966
Seniority in Public Service Not Enforceable Under Article 226: A Comprehensive Commentary on Arun Kumar Bhattacharjee And Others v. State Of West Bengal And Others Introduction The case of Arun Kumar...
Invalidation of Predetermined Show Cause Notices for Government Servants: The Precedent Set by Gouri Pr. Ghosh v. State of West Bengal

Invalidation of Predetermined Show Cause Notices for Government Servants: The Precedent Set by Gouri Pr. Ghosh v. State of West Bengal

Date: Jul 7, 1966
Invalidation of Predetermined Show Cause Notices for Government Servants: The Precedent Set by Gouri Pr. Ghosh v. State of West Bengal Introduction The landmark case of Gouri Pr. Ghosh v. State of...
Reaffirmation of Judicial Discretion in Granting Stay Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Shalimar Paints Ltd. v. Omprokash Singhania

Reaffirmation of Judicial Discretion in Granting Stay Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Shalimar Paints Ltd. v. Omprokash Singhania

Date: Jun 25, 1966
Reaffirmation of Judicial Discretion in Granting Stay Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act: Shalimar Paints Ltd. v. Omprokash Singhania Introduction The case of Shalimar Paints Ltd. v. Omprokash...
Strict Compliance Required for Verification of Winding Up Petitions: Star Textile Engineering Works Ltd. v. Gaya Textiles Pvt. Ltd.

Strict Compliance Required for Verification of Winding Up Petitions: Star Textile Engineering Works Ltd. v. Gaya Textiles Pvt. Ltd.

Date: May 26, 1966
Strict Compliance Required for Verification of Winding Up Petitions: Star Textile Engineering Works Ltd. v. Gaya Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Star Textile Engineering Works Limited v....
Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Chinmoyee Sen: Strengthening Landlord's Eviction Rights under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956

Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Chinmoyee Sen: Strengthening Landlord's Eviction Rights under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956

Date: May 21, 1966
Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Chinmoyee Sen: Strengthening Landlord's Eviction Rights under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 Introduction The case of Santosh Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Chinmoyee Sen...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Strict Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 28(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central) Calcutta v. Anwar Ali

Calcutta High Court Upholds Strict Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 28(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central) Calcutta v. Anwar Ali

Date: May 12, 1966
Calcutta High Court Upholds Strict Burden of Proof for Penalty under Section 28(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central) Calcutta v. Anwar Ali Introduction The case of...
Assessing Bona Fide Disputes and Ultra Vires Contracts in Company Winding-Up: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Steel Equipment & Construction Co. (P.) Ltd.

Assessing Bona Fide Disputes and Ultra Vires Contracts in Company Winding-Up: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Steel Equipment & Construction Co. (P.) Ltd.

Date: May 4, 1966
Assessing Bona Fide Disputes and Ultra Vires Contracts in Company Winding-Up: Calcutta High Court's Ruling in Steel Equipment & Construction Co. (P.) Ltd. Introduction The case of Steel Equipment And...
Defining Speculative Transactions under Section 24(1) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ram Chandra Gupta And Co.

Defining Speculative Transactions under Section 24(1) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ram Chandra Gupta And Co.

Date: Apr 26, 1966
Defining Speculative Transactions under Section 24(1) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ram Chandra Gupta And Co. 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Reopening of Tax Assessments Post-Legislative Amendments: Insights from M/S. Daulatram Rawatmull v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Reopening of Tax Assessments Post-Legislative Amendments: Insights from M/S. Daulatram Rawatmull v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 2, 1966
Reopening of Tax Assessments Post-Legislative Amendments: Insights from M/S. Daulatram Rawatmull v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of M/S. Daulatram Rawatmull v. Commissioner Of...
Doctrine of Readiness and Willingness in Contract Enforcement: Insights from Md. Ziaul Haque v. Calcutta Vyaper Pratisthan

Doctrine of Readiness and Willingness in Contract Enforcement: Insights from Md. Ziaul Haque v. Calcutta Vyaper Pratisthan

Date: Mar 24, 1966
Doctrine of Readiness and Willingness in Contract Enforcement: Insights from Md. Ziaul Haque v. Calcutta Vyaper Pratisthan Introduction The case of Md. Ziaul Haque v. Calcutta Vyaper Pratisthan...
Affirmation of Pre-Empption Rights under Section 4 of the Partition Act in Birendra Nath Banerjee v. Smt. Snehalata Devi

Affirmation of Pre-Empption Rights under Section 4 of the Partition Act in Birendra Nath Banerjee v. Smt. Snehalata Devi

Date: Mar 23, 1966
Affirmation of Pre-Empption Rights under Section 4 of the Partition Act in Birendra Nath Banerjee v. Smt. Snehalata Devi Introduction The case of Birendra Nath Banerjee v. Sm. Snehalata Devi And...
Deductibility of Contingent Pension Expenditure Upon Liability Realization: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Indian Molasses Co. Pr. Ltd.

Deductibility of Contingent Pension Expenditure Upon Liability Realization: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Indian Molasses Co. Pr. Ltd.

Date: Mar 17, 1966
Deductibility of Contingent Pension Expenditure Upon Liability Realization: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Indian Molasses Co. Pr. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Limitation on Delegation of Authority Under the Essential Commodities Act: Precedent in Sambhu Nath Ghosal v. State Of West Bengal And Another

Limitation on Delegation of Authority Under the Essential Commodities Act: Precedent in Sambhu Nath Ghosal v. State Of West Bengal And Another

Date: Mar 3, 1966
Limitation on Delegation of Authority Under the Essential Commodities Act: Precedent in Sambhu Nath Ghosal v. State Of West Bengal And Another Introduction In the landmark case of Sambhu Nath Ghosal...
Inclusion of Sales Tax Refunds as Trade Income: Comprehensive Analysis of Ikrahnandi Coal Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Inclusion of Sales Tax Refunds as Trade Income: Comprehensive Analysis of Ikrahnandi Coal Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 23, 1966
Inclusion of Sales Tax Refunds as Trade Income: Comprehensive Analysis of Ikrahnandi Coal Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ikrahnandi Coal Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Clarity in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from M/S. Teamco Private Ltd. v. T.M.S Mani

Clarity in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from M/S. Teamco Private Ltd. v. T.M.S Mani

Date: Feb 19, 1966
Clarity in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from M/S. Teamco Private Ltd. v. T.M.S Mani Introduction The case of M/S. Teamco Private Ltd. v. T.M.S Mani adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February...
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on Enforcement of Maintenance Orders Under Section 488(3) Cr.P.C

Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on Enforcement of Maintenance Orders Under Section 488(3) Cr.P.C

Date: Feb 17, 1966
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on Enforcement of Maintenance Orders Under Section 488(3) Cr.P.C Introduction The case of Moddari Bin (First Party) v. Sukdeo Bin (Second Party) adjudicated by...
Service of Notice under Section 33B Income Tax Act: Upholding Calcutta's Amendment to CPC Rule 17

Service of Notice under Section 33B Income Tax Act: Upholding Calcutta's Amendment to CPC Rule 17

Date: Dec 25, 1965
Service of Notice under Section 33B Income Tax Act: Upholding Calcutta's Amendment to CPC Rule 17 Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, West Bengal & Ors. v. Kiron Debi Singhee...
Retention Fee Dispute in Babulall Choukhani v. Caltex (India) Ltd.: Jurisdiction and Contractual Obligations

Retention Fee Dispute in Babulall Choukhani v. Caltex (India) Ltd.: Jurisdiction and Contractual Obligations

Date: Sep 30, 1965
Retention Fee Dispute in Babulall Choukhani v. Caltex (India) Ltd.: Jurisdiction and Contractual Obligations Introduction The case of Babulall Choukhani v. Caltex (India) Ltd. was adjudicated by the...
Upholding Minority Shareholder Rights: Analysis of Ramshankar Prosad v. Sindri Iron Foundry

Upholding Minority Shareholder Rights: Analysis of Ramshankar Prosad v. Sindri Iron Foundry

Date: Sep 29, 1965
Upholding Minority Shareholder Rights: Analysis of Ramshankar Prosad v. Sindri Iron Foundry Introduction The case of Ramshankar Prosad And Ors. v. Sindri Iron Foundry (P) Ltd. & Ors. adjudicated by...
Establishing Reasonable and Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from M/S Bharat Commerce And Industries Ltd. v. Surendra Nath Shukla

Establishing Reasonable and Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from M/S Bharat Commerce And Industries Ltd. v. Surendra Nath Shukla

Date: Sep 22, 1965
Establishing Reasonable and Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from M/S. Bharat Commerce And Industries Ltd. v. Surendra Nath Shukla Introduction The case M/S. Bharat Commerce And...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert