Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta High Court Judgment Analysis

S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta High Court Judgment Analysis

Date: May 4, 2018
Calcutta High Court Establishes Non-Mandatory Nature of Section 202 Cr.P.C. for Negotiable Instruments Act Offences Introduction In the case S.S. Binu v. State Of West Bengal & Anr. (CRR 1600 of...
Succession of Tenancy Laws: Non-Retrospective Application under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997

Succession of Tenancy Laws: Non-Retrospective Application under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997

Date: Nov 30, 2017
Succession of Tenancy Laws: Non-Retrospective Application under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 Introduction The case of Sri. Sushil Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Pilani Properties Limited adjudicated...
Calcutta High Court Upholds COTPA Over FSSA in Regulating Tobacco Products

Calcutta High Court Upholds COTPA Over FSSA in Regulating Tobacco Products

Date: Nov 2, 2017
Calcutta High Court Upholds COTPA Over FSSA in Regulating Tobacco Products Introduction The case of Sanjay Anjay Stores v. The Union Of India & Ors. before the Calcutta High Court addressed a...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Unconstitutional Nature of Policies Excluding Married Daughters from Compassionate Appointments

Calcutta High Court Establishes Unconstitutional Nature of Policies Excluding Married Daughters from Compassionate Appointments

Date: Sep 14, 2017
Calcutta High Court Establishes Unconstitutional Nature of Policies Excluding Married Daughters from Compassionate Appointments Introduction In the landmark case of The State of West Bengal & ors. v....
Calcutta High Court Establishes Compensation Based on Land Acquisition Act, 1948 Over 2013 Amendment

Calcutta High Court Establishes Compensation Based on Land Acquisition Act, 1948 Over 2013 Amendment

Date: Aug 24, 2017
Calcutta High Court Establishes Compensation Based on Land Acquisition Act, 1948 Over 2013 Amendment Introduction The case of The State of West Bengal & Ors v. Niladri Chatterjee & Ors was...
Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank

Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank

Date: Jul 8, 2017
Limitation Period and SARFAESI Act: Calcutta High Court Sets Important Precedent in Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank Introduction The case of Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty vs Allahabad Bank &...
Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Two-Year Limitation for Late Payment Surcharges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003

Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Two-Year Limitation for Late Payment Surcharges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003

Date: May 17, 2017
Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Two-Year Limitation for Late Payment Surcharges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 Introduction The case of Abdul Hamid v. West Bengal State...
Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Railway Compensation Claims: Bandana Mishra v. Union of India

Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Railway Compensation Claims: Bandana Mishra v. Union of India

Date: May 13, 2017
Revisiting the Burden of Proof in Railway Compensation Claims: Bandana Mishra v. Union of India Introduction The case of Bandana Mishra v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Distinction Between Business Income and Capital Gains in Property Development

Calcutta High Court Clarifies Distinction Between Business Income and Capital Gains in Property Development

Date: May 9, 2017
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Distinction Between Business Income and Capital Gains in Property Development Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. Rungta Properties Pvt....
Sahid Hossain Biswas v. State Of West Bengal: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof under Section 29 of the POCSO Act

Sahid Hossain Biswas v. State Of West Bengal: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof under Section 29 of the POCSO Act

Date: May 5, 2017
Sahid Hossain Biswas v. State Of West Bengal: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof under Section 29 of the POCSO Act Introduction The case of Sahid Hossain Biswas v. State Of West Bengal adjudicated by...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Retrospective Tax Amendment under Section 115JB(2)

Calcutta High Court Upholds Retrospective Tax Amendment under Section 115JB(2)

Date: May 4, 2017
Calcutta High Court Upholds Retrospective Tax Amendment under Section 115JB(2) Introduction The case of The Peerless General Finance & Investment Company Limited & Anr. v. Deputy Commissioner Of...
Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Limits of Judicial Intervention in Executive Recruitment: The State Of West Bengal v. Chandra Kanta Ganguli

Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Limits of Judicial Intervention in Executive Recruitment: The State Of West Bengal v. Chandra Kanta Ganguli

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Limits of Judicial Intervention in Executive Recruitment: The State Of West Bengal v. Chandra Kanta Ganguli Introduction The case of The State Of West Bengal & Others v....
Calcutta High Court Upholds Commissioner’s Decision to Reject Late Adjournment Requests under section 263 of the Income Tax Act

Calcutta High Court Upholds Commissioner’s Decision to Reject Late Adjournment Requests under section 263 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Apr 11, 2017
Calcutta High Court Upholds Commissioner’s Decision to Reject Late Adjournment Requests under section 263 of the Income Tax Act Introduction In the case of M/S. Aim Fincon Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner...
Ensuring Natural Justice in Insolvency Proceedings: Insights from Sree Metaliks Ltd. vs. Union Of India

Ensuring Natural Justice in Insolvency Proceedings: Insights from Sree Metaliks Ltd. vs. Union Of India

Date: Apr 8, 2017
Ensuring Natural Justice in Insolvency Proceedings: Insights from Sree Metaliks Limited And Another v. Union Of India And Anr. Introduction The case of Sree Metaliks Limited And Another v. Union Of...
Calcutta High Court Upholds 15% Tax Payment Requirement for Appeals under West Bengal VAT Act, 2003

Calcutta High Court Upholds 15% Tax Payment Requirement for Appeals under West Bengal VAT Act, 2003

Date: Mar 31, 2017
Calcutta High Court Upholds 15% Tax Payment Requirement for Appeals under West Bengal VAT Act, 2003 Introduction In the case of M/S. Vatech Wabag Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Midnapur...
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Reassessment and Notice Procedures under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act

Calcutta High Court Clarifies Reassessment and Notice Procedures under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Mar 24, 2017
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Reassessment and Notice Procedures under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Success Tours And Travels Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer...
Retrospective Application of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from M/S. Pragati Financial Management Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT Officer - II

Retrospective Application of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from M/S. Pragati Financial Management Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT Officer - II

Date: Mar 8, 2017
Retrospective Application of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from M/S. Pragati Financial Management Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT Officer - II Introduction The case of M/S. Pragati Financial Management...
Establishing Strict Liability for Railway Accidents: Insights from Smt. Radha Yadav v. Union of India

Establishing Strict Liability for Railway Accidents: Insights from Smt. Radha Yadav v. Union of India

Date: Mar 4, 2017
Establishing Strict Liability for Railway Accidents: Insights from Smt. Radha Yadav v. Union of India Introduction The case of Smt. Radha Yadav v. Union of India adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Protection of Retired Employees from Excess Payment Recovery

Calcutta High Court Upholds Protection of Retired Employees from Excess Payment Recovery

Date: Feb 15, 2017
Calcutta High Court Upholds Protection of Retired Employees from Excess Payment Recovery Introduction In the case of Sujan Kumar Ghosh v. The State Of West Bengal & Others, adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 14A Applicability in Share Trading Businesses

Calcutta High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 14A Applicability in Share Trading Businesses

Date: Feb 11, 2017
Calcutta High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 14A Applicability in Share Trading Businesses 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-2 v. M/S. G.K.K. Capital Markets (P)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert