Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Interpretation of Limitation Period Under Carriage by Air Act: British Airways v. Art Works Export Ltd.

Interpretation of Limitation Period Under Carriage by Air Act: British Airways v. Art Works Export Ltd.

Date: Jul 24, 1985
Interpretation of Limitation Period Under Carriage by Air Act: British Airways v. Art Works Export Ltd. Introduction The case of British Airways v. Art Works Export Ltd. And Another adjudicated by...
Appellant Not Liable for Lawyer’s Negligence in Ex Parte Decree: Ranipet Chemicals v Swastik Stainless

Appellant Not Liable for Lawyer’s Negligence in Ex Parte Decree: Ranipet Chemicals v Swastik Stainless

Date: Jul 4, 1985
Appellant Not Liable for Lawyer’s Negligence in Ex Parte Decree: Ranipet Chemicals & Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Swastik Stainless Steel Stores Introduction The case of Ranipet Chemicals &...
Tenant's Limited Locus Standi in Challenging Municipal Sanctions: Kumuda Sundari Properties v. Namdang Tea Co.

Tenant's Limited Locus Standi in Challenging Municipal Sanctions: Kumuda Sundari Properties v. Namdang Tea Co.

Date: Jun 26, 1985
Tenant's Limited Locus Standi in Challenging Municipal Sanctions: Kumuda Sundari Properties v. Namdang Tea Co. Introduction The case of Kumuda Sundari Properties (Private) Ltd. And Others v. Namdang...
Comprehensive Commentary on J.N Roy Chowdhury (Traders) P. Ltd. v. Jainti Enterprises: Establishing the Bona Fide Dispute Standard in Winding Up Petitions

Comprehensive Commentary on J.N Roy Chowdhury (Traders) P. Ltd. v. Jainti Enterprises: Establishing the Bona Fide Dispute Standard in Winding Up Petitions

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Establishing the Bona Fide Dispute Standard in Winding Up Petitions: A Commentary on J.N Roy Chowdhury (Traders) P. Ltd. v. Jainti Enterprises Introduction The case of J.N Roy Chowdhury (Traders) P....
Enforcing Government Promises: The Landmark Surendra Prasad Misra v. Oil And Natural Gas Commission Judgment

Enforcing Government Promises: The Landmark Surendra Prasad Misra v. Oil And Natural Gas Commission Judgment

Date: May 29, 1985
Enforcing Government Promises: The Landmark Surendra Prasad Misra v. Oil And Natural Gas Commission Judgment Introduction The case of Surendra Prasad Misra v. Oil And Natural Gas Commission,...
Doctrine of Non Est Factum Affirmed in Misrepresentation: Amar Krishna Mukherjee v. Sm. Asha Rani Ghosh And Others

Doctrine of Non Est Factum Affirmed in Misrepresentation: Amar Krishna Mukherjee v. Sm. Asha Rani Ghosh And Others

Date: May 18, 1985
Doctrine of Non Est Factum Affirmed in Misrepresentation: Amar Krishna Mukherjee v. Sm. Asha Rani Ghosh And Others Introduction The case of Amar Krishna Mukherjee v. Sm. Asha Rani Ghosh And Others...
Mental Cruelty as Ground for Divorce: Nemai Kumar Ghosh v. Sm. Mita Ghosh

Mental Cruelty as Ground for Divorce: Nemai Kumar Ghosh v. Sm. Mita Ghosh

Date: May 11, 1985
Mental Cruelty as Ground for Divorce: Nemai Kumar Ghosh v. Sm. Mita Ghosh Introduction The case of Nemai Kumar Ghosh v. Sm. Mita Ghosh is a seminal judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on...
Judicial Discretion in Awarding Interest Rates: State Bank Of India v. B. Gupta (Tea) P. Ltd. And Others

Judicial Discretion in Awarding Interest Rates: State Bank Of India v. B. Gupta (Tea) P. Ltd. And Others

Date: May 1, 1985
Judicial Discretion in Awarding Interest Rates: State Bank Of India v. B. Gupta (Tea) P. Ltd. And Others Introduction The case of State Bank Of India v. B. Gupta (Tea) P. Ltd. And Others adjudicated...
Tax Implications of Currency Devaluation: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal-Iii v. Martin And Harris P. Ltd.

Tax Implications of Currency Devaluation: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal-Iii v. Martin And Harris P. Ltd.

Date: Apr 16, 1985
Tax Implications of Currency Devaluation: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal-Iii v. Martin And Harris P. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal-Iii...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 153(3)(ii) in Income Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Chitranjali

Clarifying the Scope of Section 153(3)(ii) in Income Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Chitranjali

Date: Apr 9, 1985
Clarifying the Scope of Section 153(3)(ii) in Income Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Chitranjali Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Chitranjali adjudicated by the...
Differentiating Capital and Revenue Expenditures: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd.

Differentiating Capital and Revenue Expenditures: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd.

Date: Apr 5, 1985
Differentiating Capital and Revenue Expenditures: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bharat...
West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Affirming Exemption Claims Under Section 154

West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Affirming Exemption Claims Under Section 154

Date: Apr 5, 1985
West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Affirming Exemption Claims Under Section 154 Introduction The case of West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation v....
Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Dual Treatment of Employees for Tax Deduction Limits

Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Dual Treatment of Employees for Tax Deduction Limits

Date: Apr 3, 1985
Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Dual Treatment of Employees for Tax Deduction Limits Introduction The case of Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax adjudicated by...
Civil Procedure Code Order 9 Rule 9 Applies to Probate Proceedings: Insights from Bimla Kanta Sengupta v. Sarojini Koner

Civil Procedure Code Order 9 Rule 9 Applies to Probate Proceedings: Insights from Bimla Kanta Sengupta v. Sarojini Koner

Date: Mar 30, 1985
Civil Procedure Code Order 9 Rule 9 Applies to Probate Proceedings: Insights from Bimla Kanta Sengupta v. Sarojini Koner Introduction The case of Bimla Kanta Sengupta v. Sarojini Koner adjudicated by...
Affirmative Exemption for Partnership Firm Property under Section 5(1)(iv): Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, West Bengal-Xiv v. Mira Mehta

Affirmative Exemption for Partnership Firm Property under Section 5(1)(iv): Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, West Bengal-Xiv v. Mira Mehta

Date: Mar 26, 1985
Affirmative Exemption for Partnership Firm Property under Section 5(1)(iv): Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, West Bengal-Xiv v. Mira Mehta Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, West...
Admissibility of Additional Grounds of Appeal Under Section 35B: Madhu Jay Anti P. Ltd. v. CIT

Admissibility of Additional Grounds of Appeal Under Section 35B: Madhu Jay Anti P. Ltd. v. CIT

Date: Mar 21, 1985
Admissibility of Additional Grounds of Appeal Under Section 35B: Madhu Jay Anti P. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Madhu Jay Anti P. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Proper Sequencing of Loss Set-Off and Deductions Under Sections 80L and 80M Affirmed: Insights from CIT v. Bengal Assam Steamship Co. Ltd.

Proper Sequencing of Loss Set-Off and Deductions Under Sections 80L and 80M Affirmed: Insights from CIT v. Bengal Assam Steamship Co. Ltd.

Date: Mar 12, 1985
Proper Sequencing of Loss Set-Off and Deductions Under Sections 80L and 80M Affirmed: Insights from CIT v. Bengal Assam Steamship Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West...
Enforcement of Noise Pollution Regulations in Transport Vehicles: Rabin Mukherjee v. State Of West Bengal

Enforcement of Noise Pollution Regulations in Transport Vehicles: Rabin Mukherjee v. State Of West Bengal

Date: Mar 6, 1985
Enforcement of Noise Pollution Regulations in Transport Vehicles: Rabin Mukherjee And Others v. State Of West Bengal And Others Introduction The case of Rabin Mukherjee And Others v. State Of West...
Expansion of Interlocutory Injunctions for Restoration of Possession: Indian Cable Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Sumitra Chakraborty

Expansion of Interlocutory Injunctions for Restoration of Possession: Indian Cable Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Sumitra Chakraborty

Date: Mar 1, 1985
Expansion of Interlocutory Injunctions for Restoration of Possession: Indian Cable Company Limited v. Smt. Sumitra Chakraborty Introduction The case Indian Cable Company Limited v. Smt. Sumitra...
Capital Employed Calculation and Weighted Deductions under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Capital Employed Calculation and Weighted Deductions under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 5, 1985
Capital Employed Calculation and Weighted Deductions under the Income-Tax Act: Insights from Bharat General And Textile Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Bharat...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert