Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdictional Boundaries of Writ Courts in Challenging Statutory Show Cause Notices: Analysis of I.T.C Ltd. v. Union Of India

Jurisdictional Boundaries of Writ Courts in Challenging Statutory Show Cause Notices: Analysis of I.T.C Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Oct 13, 1988
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Writ Courts in Challenging Statutory Show Cause Notices: Analysis of I.T.C Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of I.T.C Ltd. v. Union Of India, adjudicated by...
Clarifying the Scope of 'Financial Year' for Interest under Section 215: Birla Cotton Spinning v. CIT

Clarifying the Scope of 'Financial Year' for Interest under Section 215: Birla Cotton Spinning v. CIT

Date: Oct 12, 1988
Clarifying the Scope of 'Financial Year' for Interest under Section 215: Birla Cotton Spinning v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. v....
Expansive Jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Diptendu Nayek v. State of West Bengal

Expansive Jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Diptendu Nayek v. State of West Bengal

Date: Oct 8, 1988
Expansive Jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC: Insights from Diptendu Nayek & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. 1. Introduction The case of Diptendu Nayek & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors....
Addressing Procedural Discrimination in Christian Divorce Cases: Ramish Francis Toppo v. Violet Francis Toppo

Addressing Procedural Discrimination in Christian Divorce Cases: Ramish Francis Toppo v. Violet Francis Toppo

Date: Aug 23, 1988
Addressing Procedural Discrimination in Christian Divorce Cases: Ramish Francis Toppo v. Violet Francis Toppo Introduction The case of Ramish Francis Toppo v. Violet Francis Toppo, adjudicated by the...
Reforming Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act: Insights from Swapna Ghosh v. Sadananda Ghosh

Reforming Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act: Insights from Swapna Ghosh v. Sadananda Ghosh

Date: Jul 23, 1988
Reforming Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act: Insights from Swapna Ghosh v. Sadananda Ghosh Introduction The case of Swapna Ghosh v. Sadananda Ghosh And Another, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Raj Kumar Gupta v. Barbara Gupta: Establishing the Paramountcy of Child's Welfare in Custody Disputes

Raj Kumar Gupta v. Barbara Gupta: Establishing the Paramountcy of Child's Welfare in Custody Disputes

Date: Jul 22, 1988
Raj Kumar Gupta v. Barbara Gupta: Establishing the Paramountcy of Child's Welfare in Custody Disputes Introduction Raj Kumar Gupta v. Barbara Gupta, decided by the Calcutta High Court on July 21,...
Refining Grounds for Divorce: Clarification on Irretrievable Breakdown and Nullity due to Underage Marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954

Refining Grounds for Divorce: Clarification on Irretrievable Breakdown and Nullity due to Underage Marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954

Date: Jul 12, 1988
Refining Grounds for Divorce: Clarification on Irretrievable Breakdown and Nullity due to Underage Marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 Introduction The case of Harendra Nath Burman v. Sm....
Court Intervention and Appointment of Special Officers in Corporate Oppression: Analysis of Pradip Kumar Sarkar v. Luxmi Tea Co. Ltd.

Court Intervention and Appointment of Special Officers in Corporate Oppression: Analysis of Pradip Kumar Sarkar v. Luxmi Tea Co. Ltd.

Date: Jul 7, 1988
Court Intervention and Appointment of Special Officers in Corporate Oppression: Analysis of Pradip Kumar Sarkar v. Luxmi Tea Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Pradip Kumar Sarkar and Others v. Luxmi...
Doctrine of Statutory Grounds in Divorce: Apurba Mohan Ghosh v. Manashi Ghosh

Doctrine of Statutory Grounds in Divorce: Apurba Mohan Ghosh v. Manashi Ghosh

Date: Jun 11, 1988
Doctrine of Statutory Grounds in Divorce: Apurba Mohan Ghosh v. Manashi Ghosh Introduction Apurba Mohan Ghosh v. Manashi Ghosh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on June 10,...
Clarification on Magistrate's Discretion to Dispense with Personal Attendance Under Section 205(1) CrPC - Ajit Kumar Chakraborty & Ors. v. Serampore Municipality

Clarification on Magistrate's Discretion to Dispense with Personal Attendance Under Section 205(1) CrPC - Ajit Kumar Chakraborty & Ors. v. Serampore Municipality

Date: May 13, 1988
Clarification on Magistrate's Discretion to Dispense with Personal Attendance Under Section 205(1) CrPC Introduction Ajit Kumar Chakraborty & Ors. v. Serampore Municipality is a pivotal case...
Restoration of Dismissed Applications under Order 9, Rules 4 and 9: Insights from Mst. Nurnahar Bewa v. Rabindra Nath Dev

Restoration of Dismissed Applications under Order 9, Rules 4 and 9: Insights from Mst. Nurnahar Bewa v. Rabindra Nath Dev

Date: May 13, 1988
Restoration of Dismissed Applications under Order 9, Rules 4 and 9: Insights from Mst. Nurnahar Bewa v. Rabindra Nath Dev Introduction The case of Mst. Nurnahar Bewa And Another v. Rabindra Nath Dev...
Dissolution of Unregistered Partnership and Unauthorized Acts: Tilokram Ghosh v. Sita Rani Sadhukhan

Dissolution of Unregistered Partnership and Unauthorized Acts: Tilokram Ghosh v. Sita Rani Sadhukhan

Date: May 12, 1988
Dissolution of Unregistered Partnership and Unauthorized Acts: Tilokram Ghosh v. Sita Rani Sadhukhan Introduction The case of Tilokram Ghosh And Others v. Smt. Gita Rani Sadhukhan And Others was...
Limits of Promissory Estoppel in Public Policy: Black Diamond Beverages Ltd. v. Union Of India

Limits of Promissory Estoppel in Public Policy: Black Diamond Beverages Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: May 5, 1988
Limits of Promissory Estoppel in Public Policy: Black Diamond Beverages Ltd. v. Union Of India 1. Introduction The case of Black Diamond Beverages Ltd. v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Affirmation of Tenant's Rights to Non-Permanent Modifications under Transfer of Property Act: Ratnamala Dasi v. Ratan Singh Bawa

Affirmation of Tenant's Rights to Non-Permanent Modifications under Transfer of Property Act: Ratnamala Dasi v. Ratan Singh Bawa

Date: Apr 16, 1988
Affirmation of Tenant's Rights to Non-Permanent Modifications under Transfer of Property Act: Ratnamala Dasi v. Ratan Singh Bawa Introduction In the landmark case of Ratnamala Dasi And Others v....
Affirming Trade Mark Rights Amidst Restricted Markets: Analysis of Express Bottlers Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Pepsico Inc.

Affirming Trade Mark Rights Amidst Restricted Markets: Analysis of Express Bottlers Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Pepsico Inc.

Date: Mar 25, 1988
Affirming Trade Mark Rights Amidst Restricted Markets: Analysis of Express Bottlers Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Pepsico Inc. Introduction The legal battle in Express Bottlers Services Private Ltd. v....
Tax Deduction of Legal Expenses in Business Asset Preservation: Insights from Darjeeling Dooars Plantations Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Tax Deduction of Legal Expenses in Business Asset Preservation: Insights from Darjeeling Dooars Plantations Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 5, 1988
Tax Deduction of Legal Expenses in Business Asset Preservation: Insights from Darjeeling Dooars Plantations Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 1. Introduction The case of Darjeeling Dooars...
Presumption of Extended Time and Limits on Criminal Prosecution for Tax Return Delays: Analysis of Gopalji Shaw v. Income-Tax Officer

Presumption of Extended Time and Limits on Criminal Prosecution for Tax Return Delays: Analysis of Gopalji Shaw v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Mar 5, 1988
Presumption of Extended Time and Limits on Criminal Prosecution for Tax Return Delays: Analysis of Gopalji Shaw v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Gopalji Shaw v. Income-Tax Officer heard...
Limits on Presumption of Service of Notices in Tenancy Ejectment: Insights from Mono Ranjan Dasgupta v. Suchitra Ganguly

Limits on Presumption of Service of Notices in Tenancy Ejectment: Insights from Mono Ranjan Dasgupta v. Suchitra Ganguly

Date: Feb 20, 1988
Limits on Presumption of Service of Notices in Tenancy Ejectment: Insights from Mono Ranjan Dasgupta v. Suchitra Ganguly Introduction Case: Mono Ranjan Dasgupta v. Suchitra Ganguly And Others Court:...
Strict Adherence to Recorded Reasons in Reopening Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Equitable Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer

Strict Adherence to Recorded Reasons in Reopening Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Equitable Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Feb 20, 1988
Strict Adherence to Recorded Reasons in Reopening Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Equitable Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Equitable Investment...
Reaffirmation of "Reasonable Requirement for Own Occupation" as a Ground for Ejectment under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act

Reaffirmation of "Reasonable Requirement for Own Occupation" as a Ground for Ejectment under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act

Date: Dec 25, 1987
Reaffirmation of "Reasonable Requirement for Own Occupation" as a Ground for Ejectment under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act Introduction The case of Debakinandan Boobna v. Harasundar Sarkar,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert