Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Enhancement of Assessment under Section 251: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Company Ltd.

Enhancement of Assessment under Section 251: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Company Ltd.

Date: Aug 9, 1990
Enhancement of Assessment under Section 251: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Company Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Company Ltd.,...
Affirmation of Notice Serving Methods and Unauthorized Transfer under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act in Ennis v. Calcutta Vyapar Pratisthan Ltd.

Affirmation of Notice Serving Methods and Unauthorized Transfer under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act in Ennis v. Calcutta Vyapar Pratisthan Ltd.

Date: Aug 4, 1990
Affirmation of Notice Serving Methods and Unauthorized Transfer under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act in Ennis v. Calcutta Vyapar Pratisthan Ltd. Introduction The case of Miss D. Ennis v....
Revisiting Reassessment Validity: Allahabad Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Revisiting Reassessment Validity: Allahabad Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jun 27, 1990
Revisiting Reassessment Validity: Allahabad Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Allahabad Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June 26,...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Distinguishing Tenant from Licensee in Eviction Suits

Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Distinguishing Tenant from Licensee in Eviction Suits

Date: Jun 21, 1990
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Distinguishing Tenant from Licensee in Eviction Suits Introduction The case of Samir Kumar Chatterjee v. Hirendra Nath Ghosh, adjudicated by the...
Judicial Affirmation on Proper Implementation of Section 269UD: Rejecting Premature Objections in Land Transfers - Kelvin Jute Company Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority

Judicial Affirmation on Proper Implementation of Section 269UD: Rejecting Premature Objections in Land Transfers - Kelvin Jute Company Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority

Date: May 19, 1990
Judicial Affirmation on Proper Implementation of Section 269UD: Rejecting Premature Objections in Land Transfers - Kelvin Jute Company Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority 1. Introduction The case of The...
Mandatory Vacation of Ex Parte Interim Orders under Article 226(3) - Krishan Kumar Aganvala v. Reserve Bank Of India

Mandatory Vacation of Ex Parte Interim Orders under Article 226(3) - Krishan Kumar Aganvala v. Reserve Bank Of India

Date: May 9, 1990
Mandatory Vacation of Ex Parte Interim Orders under Article 226(3) Krishan Kumar Aganvala v. Reserve Bank Of India And Others Calcutta High Court, May 8, 1990 Introduction The case of Krishan Kumar...
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Over Co-Operative Housing Societies: Insights from Anjan Choudhury v. Anandaneer Co-Operative Registered Housing Society

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Over Co-Operative Housing Societies: Insights from Anjan Choudhury v. Anandaneer Co-Operative Registered Housing Society

Date: Mar 29, 1990
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Over Co-Operative Housing Societies: Insights from Anjan Choudhury v. Anandaneer Co-Operative Registered Housing Society Introduction The judicial landscape concerning...
Non-Retrospective Application of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Madras Forgings v. Suresh Chandra

Non-Retrospective Application of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Madras Forgings v. Suresh Chandra

Date: Mar 29, 1990
Non-Retrospective Application of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Insights from Madras Forgings and Allied Industries C.B.C. Ltd. v. Suresh Chandra And Anr. Introduction The case of...
Balailal Mookerjee & Co. v. Sea Traders Private Ltd.: Establishing Grounds for Interlocutory Injunctions in Business Conspiracy Cases

Balailal Mookerjee & Co. v. Sea Traders Private Ltd.: Establishing Grounds for Interlocutory Injunctions in Business Conspiracy Cases

Date: Mar 20, 1990
Balailal Mookerjee & Co. v. Sea Traders Private Ltd.: Establishing Grounds for Interlocutory Injunctions in Business Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of Balailal Mookerjee & Co. (P) Ltd. & Ors....
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arvind Investments Ltd.: Interpretation of Section 73 and Its Implications

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arvind Investments Ltd.: Interpretation of Section 73 and Its Implications

Date: Mar 10, 1990
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arvind Investments Ltd.: Interpretation of Section 73 and Its Implications Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Arvind Investments Ltd. was adjudicated...
Revision Jurisdiction Under Section 263 in Assessment Orders Following IAC Directions – Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mulchand Bagri

Revision Jurisdiction Under Section 263 in Assessment Orders Following IAC Directions – Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mulchand Bagri

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Revision Jurisdiction Under Section 263 in Assessment Orders Following IAC Directions – Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mulchand Bagri Introduction Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mulchand Bagri is a...
Vijaya Bank v. Art. Trend Exports: Pioneering Guidelines on Interest and Instalments in Money Suits

Vijaya Bank v. Art. Trend Exports: Pioneering Guidelines on Interest and Instalments in Money Suits

Date: Mar 1, 1990
Vijaya Bank v. Art. Trend Exports: Pioneering Guidelines on Interest and Instalments in Money Suits Introduction The case of Vijaya Bank And Etc. v. Art. Trend Exports And Etc. adjudicated by the...
Recognition of Royalty and Commission Payments as Revenue Expenditure in Tax Deductions

Recognition of Royalty and Commission Payments as Revenue Expenditure in Tax Deductions

Date: Feb 24, 1990
Recognition of Royalty and Commission Payments as Revenue Expenditure in Tax Deductions Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Hindusthan Motors Ltd. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Administrative Dealership Selections: Chinmoy Sarkar v. Md. Shaniat Hossain

Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Administrative Dealership Selections: Chinmoy Sarkar v. Md. Shaniat Hossain

Date: Feb 9, 1990
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in Administrative Dealership Selections: Chinmoy Sarkar v. Md. Shaniat Hossain Introduction The case of Chinmoy Sarkar And Etc. v. Md. Shaniat Hossain And Etc. adjudicated...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Carry Forward of Tax Losses under Section 80

Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Carry Forward of Tax Losses under Section 80

Date: Jan 10, 1990
Calcutta High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Carry Forward of Tax Losses under Section 80 Introduction The case of Burdwan Wholesale Consumers' Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Clarification on Section 35B and 80-I Deductions in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dunlop India Ltd.

Clarification on Section 35B and 80-I Deductions in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dunlop India Ltd.

Date: Jan 9, 1990
Clarification on Section 35B and 80-I Deductions in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dunlop India Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Dunlop India Ltd. was adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Complaint Sufficiency in Forgery Allegations

Calcutta High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Complaint Sufficiency in Forgery Allegations

Date: Dec 21, 1989
Calcutta High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Complaint Sufficiency in Forgery Allegations Introduction The case of J. Th. Zwart & Ors. v. Indrani Mukherjee adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Discretionary Nature of Section 155 of the Companies Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farha Sheikh v. Escman Metalo Chemical Pvt. Ltd.

Discretionary Nature of Section 155 of the Companies Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farha Sheikh v. Escman Metalo Chemical Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 30, 1989
Discretionary Nature of Section 155 of the Companies Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farha Sheikh v. Escman Metalo Chemical Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Farha Sheikh v. Escman Metalo Chemical...
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure in Royalty Payments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Engineering Industries Ltd.

Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure in Royalty Payments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Engineering Industries Ltd.

Date: Nov 17, 1989
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure in Royalty Payments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National Engineering Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. National...
Deductibility of Employee Welfare Trust Contributions under Section 37: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Machine Tools (India) Ltd.

Deductibility of Employee Welfare Trust Contributions under Section 37: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Machine Tools (India) Ltd.

Date: Nov 9, 1989
Deductibility of Employee Welfare Trust Contributions under Section 37: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Machine Tools (India) Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert