Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Essential Ceremonies Validate Hindu and Special Marriages: Comprehensive Analysis of Joyita Saha v. Rajesh Kumar Pandey

Essential Ceremonies Validate Hindu and Special Marriages: Comprehensive Analysis of Joyita Saha v. Rajesh Kumar Pandey

Date: Feb 6, 1999
Essential Ceremonies Validate Hindu and Special Marriages: Comprehensive Analysis of Joyita Saha v. Rajesh Kumar Pandey [Calcutta High Court, 1999] Introduction The case of Joyita Saha v. Rajesh...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Boundaries in Arbitration Applications

Calcutta High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Boundaries in Arbitration Applications

Date: Feb 3, 1999
Calcutta High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Boundaries in Arbitration Applications Introduction The case of Modi Korea Telecommunication Ltd. v. Appcon Consultants Pvt. Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Affirming Inherent Powers and Judicial Oversight in Company Law: An Analysis of Rajendra Kumar Malhotra v. Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons Ltd.

Affirming Inherent Powers and Judicial Oversight in Company Law: An Analysis of Rajendra Kumar Malhotra v. Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons Ltd.

Date: Feb 2, 1999
Affirming Inherent Powers and Judicial Oversight in Company Law: An Analysis of Rajendra Kumar Malhotra v. Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons Ltd. Introduction The case of Rajendra Kumar Malhotra & Ors. v....
Kumar Trading Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union Of India & Ors.: High Court's Stance on Unauthorized Imports and Petitioner's Rights

Kumar Trading Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union Of India & Ors.: High Court's Stance on Unauthorized Imports and Petitioner's Rights

Date: Feb 2, 1999
Kumar Trading Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union Of India & Ors.: High Court's Stance on Unauthorized Imports and Petitioner's Rights Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and...
Clarifying Advertisement Expenditure and Subsidy Treatment under Indian Income-Tax Law: Insights from Sarda Plywood Industries Ltd. v. CIT

Clarifying Advertisement Expenditure and Subsidy Treatment under Indian Income-Tax Law: Insights from Sarda Plywood Industries Ltd. v. CIT

Date: Jan 28, 1999
Clarifying Advertisement Expenditure and Subsidy Treatment under Indian Income-Tax Law: Insights from Sarda Plywood Industries Ltd. v. CIT Introduction The case of Sarda Plywood Industries Ltd. v....
Transfer of Lessee’s Interest by Official Liquidators: Insights from Delhi Development Authority v. The Official Liquidator

Transfer of Lessee’s Interest by Official Liquidators: Insights from Delhi Development Authority v. The Official Liquidator

Date: Jan 26, 1999
Transfer of Lessee’s Interest by Official Liquidators: Insights from Delhi Development Authority v. The Official Liquidator Introduction The case of Delhi Development Authority v. The Official...
Calcutta High Court Reinforces Procedural Fairness under Section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act

Calcutta High Court Reinforces Procedural Fairness under Section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act

Date: Dec 25, 1998
Calcutta High Court Reinforces Procedural Fairness under Section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act Introduction The case of Peerless General Finance And Investment Co. Ltd. And Another v. Deputy...
Deductibility of Bad Debts Amid Debtor Change: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Howrah Flour Mills Ltd.

Deductibility of Bad Debts Amid Debtor Change: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Howrah Flour Mills Ltd.

Date: Dec 18, 1998
Deductibility of Bad Debts Amid Debtor Change: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Howrah Flour Mills Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Howrah Flour...
Clarification on Jurisdiction of Small Cause Courts in Eviction Proceedings: Ajit Kumar Moitra & Ors. v. Dilip Kumar Sen Dilip Sen & Anr.

Clarification on Jurisdiction of Small Cause Courts in Eviction Proceedings: Ajit Kumar Moitra & Ors. v. Dilip Kumar Sen Dilip Sen & Anr.

Date: Dec 9, 1998
Clarification on Jurisdiction of Small Cause Courts in Eviction Proceedings Introduction The case of Ajit Kumar Moitra & Ors. v. Dilip Kumar Sen Dilip Sen & Anr. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Insights from Britannia Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax

Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Insights from Britannia Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Nov 18, 1998
Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148: Insights from Britannia Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Britannia Industries Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of...
Protection Against Arbitrary Administrative Actions: Indian Oil Corporation v. Shri Ujjal Chowdhury

Protection Against Arbitrary Administrative Actions: Indian Oil Corporation v. Shri Ujjal Chowdhury

Date: Nov 7, 1998
Protection Against Arbitrary Administrative Actions: Indian Oil Corporation v. Shri Ujjal Chowdhury Introduction In the landmark case of Indian Oil Corporation & Ors. v. Shri Ujjal Chowdhury & Ors.,...
Corroboration of Approver's Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Ranadhir Basu v. State Of West Bengal

Corroboration of Approver's Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Ranadhir Basu v. State Of West Bengal

Date: Sep 25, 1998
Corroboration of Approver's Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Ranadhir Basu v. State Of West Bengal Introduction The case of Ranadhir Basu v. State Of West Bengal decided by the Calcutta High Court...
Affirmation of Exclusive Design Rights under India's Designs Act, 1911: Rotomac Pens Ltd. v. Milap Chand & Co.

Affirmation of Exclusive Design Rights under India's Designs Act, 1911: Rotomac Pens Ltd. v. Milap Chand & Co.

Date: Sep 23, 1998
Affirmation of Exclusive Design Rights under India's Designs Act, 1911: Rotomac Pens Ltd. v. Milap Chand & Co. 1. Introduction The case of Rotomac Pens Ltd. v. Milap Chand & Co. adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Precedent on Oppressive Conduct in Family-Controlled Companies

Calcutta High Court Establishes Precedent on Oppressive Conduct in Family-Controlled Companies

Date: Sep 19, 1998
Calcutta High Court Establishes Precedent on Oppressive Conduct in Family-Controlled Companies Introduction The case of Bajrang Prasad Jalan And Others v. Mahabir Prasad Jalan And Others adjudicated...
Gokul Chandra Panja v. Union of India: Upholding Personal Knowledge Certificates in Freedom Fighter Pension Entitlement

Gokul Chandra Panja v. Union of India: Upholding Personal Knowledge Certificates in Freedom Fighter Pension Entitlement

Date: Sep 3, 1998
Gokul Chandra Panja v. Union of India: Upholding Personal Knowledge Certificates in Freedom Fighter Pension Entitlement Introduction The case of Gokul Chandra Panja v. Union Of India & Ors. was...
Limitation of Appeal Rights Under the Arbitration Act: Analysis of State Of West Bengal & Ors. v. R.C Banerjee

Limitation of Appeal Rights Under the Arbitration Act: Analysis of State Of West Bengal & Ors. v. R.C Banerjee

Date: Aug 29, 1998
Limitation of Appeal Rights Under the Arbitration Act: Analysis of State Of West Bengal & Ors. v. R.C Banerjee Introduction The case of State Of West Bengal & Ors. v. R.C Banerjee, adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Boundaries of Commercial Disparagement: Reckitt & Colman v. Ramchandran

Clarifying the Boundaries of Commercial Disparagement: Reckitt & Colman v. Ramchandran

Date: Aug 25, 1998
Clarifying the Boundaries of Commercial Disparagement: Reckitt & Colman v. Ramchandran Introduction The case of Reckitt & Colman Of India Ltd. v. M.P Ramchandran & Anr. was adjudicated by the...
High Court Affirms Writ Jurisdiction in Central Excise Matters and Mandates Comprehensive Financial Evaluation: Ruby Rubber Industries v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Calcutta-II

High Court Affirms Writ Jurisdiction in Central Excise Matters and Mandates Comprehensive Financial Evaluation: Ruby Rubber Industries v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Calcutta-II

Date: Jul 3, 1998
High Court Affirms Writ Jurisdiction in Central Excise Matters and Mandates Comprehensive Financial Evaluation Introduction The case of Ruby Rubber Industries v. Commissioner Of C. Ex., Calcutta-II...
Chief Justice’s Prerogative in Handling Review Petitions: Ratanlal Nahata v. Nandita Bose

Chief Justice’s Prerogative in Handling Review Petitions: Ratanlal Nahata v. Nandita Bose

Date: Jul 1, 1998
Chief Justice’s Prerogative in Handling Review Petitions: Ratanlal Nahata v. Nandita Bose Introduction The case of Ratanlal Nahata And Etc. v. Nandita Bose And Etc., adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Strict Adherence to Recruitment Rules Affirmed in Sri Debasis Dutta v. State Of West Bengal

Strict Adherence to Recruitment Rules Affirmed in Sri Debasis Dutta v. State Of West Bengal

Date: May 14, 1998
Strict Adherence to Recruitment Rules Affirmed in Sri Debasis Dutta v. State Of West Bengal Introduction The case of Sri Debasis Dutta v. State Of West Bengal, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert