Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Nandini Chatterjee v. Arup Hari Chatterjee

Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Nandini Chatterjee v. Arup Hari Chatterjee

Date: Sep 21, 2000
Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Nandini Chatterjee v. Arup Hari Chatterjee Introduction The case of Nandini Chatterjee v. Arup Hari Chatterjee, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Bagree Cereals v. Bagri: High Court Emphasizes Essential Jurisdictional Findings for Winding Up under Companies Act

Bagree Cereals v. Bagri: High Court Emphasizes Essential Jurisdictional Findings for Winding Up under Companies Act

Date: Aug 26, 2000
Bagree Cereals v. Bagri: High Court Emphasizes Essential Jurisdictional Findings for Winding Up under Companies Act Introduction In the landmark case of Bagree Cereals (P) Ltd. & Ors. v. Hanuman...
Recognition of Arbitral Tribunals under Article 227: Insights from M/S. Unik Accurates Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Sumedha Fiscal Services Ltd.

Recognition of Arbitral Tribunals under Article 227: Insights from M/S. Unik Accurates Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Sumedha Fiscal Services Ltd.

Date: Aug 8, 2000
Recognition of Arbitral Tribunals under Article 227: Insights from M/S. Unik Accurates Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Sumedha Fiscal Services Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of M/S. Unik Accurates Pvt....
Calcutta High Court Upholds Proper Tax Deduction Practices in Ito v. LIC of India

Calcutta High Court Upholds Proper Tax Deduction Practices in Ito v. LIC of India

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Calcutta High Court Upholds Proper Tax Deduction Practices in Ito v. LIC of India Introduction The case of Ito v. LIC of India adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July 31, 2000, presents a...
De-reservation of Reserved Posts Amid Legislative Changes: Insights from Salauddin Miah v. State Of West Bengal

De-reservation of Reserved Posts Amid Legislative Changes: Insights from Salauddin Miah v. State Of West Bengal

Date: Jul 21, 2000
De-reservation of Reserved Posts Amid Legislative Changes: Insights from Salauddin Miah v. State Of West Bengal Introduction The case of Salauddin Miah v. State Of West Bengal & Ors. adjudicated by...
Enforceability of Decrees Against Unlicensed Money Lenders: Insights from Swaika Vanaspati Products Ltd. v. Canbank Financial Services Ltd.

Enforceability of Decrees Against Unlicensed Money Lenders: Insights from Swaika Vanaspati Products Ltd. v. Canbank Financial Services Ltd.

Date: Jun 15, 2000
Enforceability of Decrees Against Unlicensed Money Lenders: Insights from Swaika Vanaspati Products Ltd. v. Canbank Financial Services Ltd. Introduction The case of Swaika Vanaspati Products Ltd. v....
Clarifying the Scope of Clause 15 Appeals under Letters Patent: Tanusree Art Printers v. Pal

Clarifying the Scope of Clause 15 Appeals under Letters Patent: Tanusree Art Printers v. Pal

Date: May 19, 2000
Clarifying the Scope of Clause 15 Appeals under Letters Patent: M/S. Tanusree Art Printers & Anr. v. Rabindra Nath Pal Introduction The case of M/S. Tanusree Art Printers & Anr. v. Rabindra Nath Pal...
Berger Paints v. Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax: Defining the Scope of Reassessment under Section 148

Berger Paints v. Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax: Defining the Scope of Reassessment under Section 148

Date: May 17, 2000
Berger Paints v. Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax: Defining the Scope of Reassessment under Section 148 Introduction The case of Berger Paints India Ltd. And Others v. Joint Commissioner Of...
Tata Finance Limited v. Pragati Paribahan: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Arbitration Proceedings

Tata Finance Limited v. Pragati Paribahan: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Arbitration Proceedings

Date: Apr 18, 2000
Tata Finance Limited v. Pragati Paribahan: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Arbitration Proceedings Introduction The case of Tata Finance Limited v. Pragati Paribahan And Others adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Tax Assessment: Berger Paints India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Jurisdictional Clarity in Tax Assessment: Berger Paints India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 5, 2000
Jurisdictional Clarity in Tax Assessment: Berger Paints India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Berger Paints India Ltd. And Others v. Assistant Commissioner Of...
Retrospective Exemption from ESI Contributions: Insights from Everett (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal

Retrospective Exemption from ESI Contributions: Insights from Everett (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal

Date: Mar 28, 2000
Retrospective Exemption from ESI Contributions: Insights from Everett (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal Introduction The case of Everett (India) Private Ltd. v. State Of West Bengal And Ors....
Adjoining Ownership in Pre-emption under West Bengal Land Reforms Act: Insights from Smt. Bula Kundu v. Sri Nirmal Kumar Kundu

Adjoining Ownership in Pre-emption under West Bengal Land Reforms Act: Insights from Smt. Bula Kundu v. Sri Nirmal Kumar Kundu

Date: Mar 3, 2000
Adjoining Ownership in Pre-emption under West Bengal Land Reforms Act: Insights from Smt. Bula Kundu v. Sri Nirmal Kumar Kundu And Anr. Introduction The case of Smt. Bula Kundu v. Sri Nirmal Kumar...
Mandated Adherence to Order 39 Rule 3 CPC in Arbitration Injunctions: Supratik Ghosh & Anr. v. Pasari Housing Development Pvt. Ltd.

Mandated Adherence to Order 39 Rule 3 CPC in Arbitration Injunctions: Supratik Ghosh & Anr. v. Pasari Housing Development Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Feb 1, 2000
Mandated Adherence to Order 39 Rule 3 CPC in Arbitration Injunctions: Supratik Ghosh & Anr. v. Pasari Housing Development Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Supratik Ghosh & Anr. v. Pasari Housing...
Net Income Basis for Deductions under Section 80-O Affirmed in Commissioner Of Income Tax Bengal-I v. M/S. M.N Dastur & Co. (P) Ltd.

Net Income Basis for Deductions under Section 80-O Affirmed in Commissioner Of Income Tax Bengal-I v. M/S. M.N Dastur & Co. (P) Ltd.

Date: Jan 15, 2000
Net Income Basis for Deductions under Section 80-O Affirmed in Commissioner Of Income Tax Bengal-I v. M/S. M.N Dastur & Co. (P) Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax Bengal-I,...
Jurisdictional Bounds in Arbitration: Insights from West Bengal State Electricity Board v. Bengal Traders

Jurisdictional Bounds in Arbitration: Insights from West Bengal State Electricity Board v. Bengal Traders

Date: Jan 11, 2000
Jurisdictional Bounds in Arbitration: Insights from West Bengal State Electricity Board v. Bengal Traders Introduction The case of West Bengal State Electricity Board v. Bengal Traders adjudicated by...
Interpretation of 'Police Report' under Section 173 CrPC and Its Impact on Cognizance under NDPS Act: State Of West Bengal v. Anwar (2000)

Interpretation of 'Police Report' under Section 173 CrPC and Its Impact on Cognizance under NDPS Act: State Of West Bengal v. Anwar (2000)

Date: Jan 5, 2000
Interpretation of 'Police Report' under Section 173 CrPC and Its Impact on Cognizance under NDPS Act: State Of West Bengal v. Anwar (2000) Introduction The case State Of West Bengal v. Anwar Alias...
Improper Appellate Consideration in Ad Interim Injunctions: Jitesh Pandey v. Smt. Urmilata Sinha & Ors.

Improper Appellate Consideration in Ad Interim Injunctions: Jitesh Pandey v. Smt. Urmilata Sinha & Ors.

Date: Oct 14, 1999
Improper Appellate Consideration in Ad Interim Injunctions: Jitesh Pandey v. Smt. Urmilata Sinha & Ors. Introduction The case of Jitesh Pandey v. Smt. Urmilata Sinha & Ors. adjudicated by the...
Defining Sister Ship Ownership and Corporate Veil in Admiralty Law: M.V Dong Do & Anr. v. Ramesh Kumar & Co. Ltd.

Defining Sister Ship Ownership and Corporate Veil in Admiralty Law: M.V Dong Do & Anr. v. Ramesh Kumar & Co. Ltd.

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Defining Sister Ship Ownership and Corporate Veil in Admiralty Law Introduction The case of Owners & Parties Interested In The Vessel M.V Dong Do & Anr. v. Ramesh Kumar & Co. Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Clarification on Re-examination of Witnesses under Section 138 of the Evidence Act: Insights from State Of West Bengal v. Arunesh Pathak

Clarification on Re-examination of Witnesses under Section 138 of the Evidence Act: Insights from State Of West Bengal v. Arunesh Pathak

Date: Aug 25, 1999
Clarification on Re-examination of Witnesses under Section 138 of the Evidence Act: Insights from State Of West Bengal v. Arunesh Pathak Introduction The case of State Of West Bengal v. Arunesh...
Calcutta High Court Rules Erection of Boilers Not Equivalent to Manufacturing Under Section 32A

Calcutta High Court Rules Erection of Boilers Not Equivalent to Manufacturing Under Section 32A

Date: Aug 21, 1999
Calcutta High Court Rules Erection of Boilers Not Equivalent to Manufacturing Under Section 32A Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Babcock And Wilcox Of India Ltd. adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert