Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Establishing the Validity of Familial Wakfs in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Meer Mahomed Israil Khan v. Sashti Churn Ghose And Ors.

Establishing the Validity of Familial Wakfs in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Meer Mahomed Israil Khan v. Sashti Churn Ghose And Ors.

Date: Mar 19, 1892
Establishing the Validity of Familial Wakfs in Muhammadan Law: Insights from Meer Mahomed Israil Khan v. Sashti Churn Ghose And Ors. Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes...
Liability in Dissemination of Seditious Material under Section 124-A: Queen Empress v. Jogendra Chunder Bose And Ors. (1891)

Liability in Dissemination of Seditious Material under Section 124-A: Queen Empress v. Jogendra Chunder Bose And Ors. (1891)

Date: Aug 26, 1891
Liability in Dissemination of Seditious Material under Section 124-A: Queen Empress v. Jogendra Chunder Bose And Ors. (1891) Introduction The case of Queen Empress v. Jogendra Chunder Bose And Ors.,...
Piran v. Abdool Karim And Ors.: Establishing Wakf Property Protections and Sajjadanashin Authority

Piran v. Abdool Karim And Ors.: Establishing Wakf Property Protections and Sajjadanashin Authority

Date: Aug 8, 1891
Piran v. Abdool Karim And Ors.: Establishing Wakf Property Protections and Sajjadanashin Authority Introduction The case of Piran v. Abdool Karim And Ors. adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Affirmation of Crown-Granted Ferry Franchise Rights in Nityahari Roy v. Dunne

Affirmation of Crown-Granted Ferry Franchise Rights in Nityahari Roy v. Dunne

Date: Jun 30, 1891
Affirmation of Crown-Granted Ferry Franchise Rights in Nityahari Roy v. Dunne Introduction The case of Nityahari Roy And Ors. v. Dunne And Ors. adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June 29,...
Enforcing Religious and Charitable Purposes in Wakf Structures: Calcutta High Court's Decision in Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v. Rasamaya Dhur Chowdhuri

Enforcing Religious and Charitable Purposes in Wakf Structures: Calcutta High Court's Decision in Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v. Rasamaya Dhur Chowdhuri

Date: Feb 25, 1891
Enforcing Religious and Charitable Purposes in Wakf Structures: Calcutta High Court's Decision in Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v. Rasamaya Dhur Chowdhuri Introduction The case of Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak...
Exclusive Cognisance of Section 244 in Execution Objections: An Analysis of Punchanun Bundopadhya v. Rabia Bibi

Exclusive Cognisance of Section 244 in Execution Objections: An Analysis of Punchanun Bundopadhya v. Rabia Bibi

Date: Jun 19, 1890
Exclusive Cognisance of Section 244 in Execution Objections: An Analysis of Punchanun Bundopadhya, Minor By v. Rabia Bibi And Ors Introduction The case of Punchanun Bundopadhya, Minor By v. Rabia...
Consolidation of Rent and Prohibition of Abwabs: Insights from Radha Prosad Singh v. Bal Kowar Koeri

Consolidation of Rent and Prohibition of Abwabs: Insights from Radha Prosad Singh v. Bal Kowar Koeri

Date: Jun 3, 1890
Consolidation of Rent and Prohibition of Abwabs: Insights from Radha Prosad Singh v. Bal Kowar Koeri Introduction Radha Prosad Singh v. Bal Kowar Koeri is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Defining 'Object' and 'Property' under IPC: Insights from Romesh Chunder Sannyal v. Hiru Mondal

Defining 'Object' and 'Property' under IPC: Insights from Romesh Chunder Sannyal v. Hiru Mondal

Date: Apr 16, 1890
Defining 'Object' and 'Property' under IPC: Insights from Romesh Chunder Sannyal v. Hiru Mondal Introduction The case of Romesh Chunder Sannyal v. Hiru Mondal And Anr. adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Obligation of Heirs to Provide Maintenance: Analysis of Kamini Dassee v. Chandra Pode Mondle And Ors.

Obligation of Heirs to Provide Maintenance: Analysis of Kamini Dassee v. Chandra Pode Mondle And Ors.

Date: Aug 21, 1889
Obligation of Heirs to Provide Maintenance: Analysis of Kamini Dassee v. Chandra Pode Mondle And Ors. Introduction The case of Kamini Dassee v. Chandra Pode Mondle And Ors. heard by the Calcutta High...
Clarification on 'Unlawful Purpose' Under Section 551 of CrPC: Abraham v. Mahtabo And Anr.

Clarification on 'Unlawful Purpose' Under Section 551 of CrPC: Abraham v. Mahtabo And Anr.

Date: Mar 29, 1889
Clarification on 'Unlawful Purpose' Under Section 551 of CrPC: Abraham v. Mahtabo And Anr. 1. Introduction The case of Abraham v. Mahtabo And Anr., adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on March 28,...
Section 170 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Implications for Execution Proceedings

Section 170 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Implications for Execution Proceedings

Date: Feb 10, 1889
Section 170 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Implications for Execution Proceedings Introduction The case of Deb Narain Dutt v. Narendra Krishna And Anr. adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February...
Limitation of Execution Jurisdiction in Civil Courts: Gokul Kristo Chunder v. Aukhil Chunder Chatterjee (1889)

Limitation of Execution Jurisdiction in Civil Courts: Gokul Kristo Chunder v. Aukhil Chunder Chatterjee (1889)

Date: Feb 8, 1889
Limitation of Execution Jurisdiction in Civil Courts: Gokul Kristo Chunder v. Aukhil Chunder Chatterjee (1889) Introduction The case of Gokul Kristo Chunder v. Aukhil Chunder Chatterjee was...
Revisional Jurisdiction Under Sections 435-439: Insights from Hari Dass Sanyal And Ors. v. Saritulla

Revisional Jurisdiction Under Sections 435-439: Insights from Hari Dass Sanyal And Ors. v. Saritulla

Date: Mar 22, 1888
Revisional Jurisdiction Under Sections 435-439: Insights from Hari Dass Sanyal And Ors. v. Saritulla Introduction The case of Hari Dass Sanyal And Ors. v. Saritulla, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Reversionary Interest of a Widow's Share in Bengal Law: Sorolah Dossee v. Bhoobun Mohun Neoghy And Ors

Reversionary Interest of a Widow's Share in Bengal Law: Sorolah Dossee v. Bhoobun Mohun Neoghy And Ors

Date: Jan 24, 1888
Reversionary Interest of a Widow's Share in Bengal Law: Sorolah Dossee v. Bhoobun Mohun Neoghy And Ors Introduction The case of Sorolah Dossee And Unnopoornah v. Bhoobun Mohun Neoghy And Ors,...
Judicial Interpretation of Search Warrants under Criminal Procedure Code: Ahmed Mahomed v. Ahmed Mahomed (Calcutta High Court, 1887)

Judicial Interpretation of Search Warrants under Criminal Procedure Code: Ahmed Mahomed v. Ahmed Mahomed (Calcutta High Court, 1887)

Date: Oct 14, 1887
Judicial Interpretation of Search Warrants under Criminal Procedure Code: Ahmed Mahomed v. Ahmed Mahomed (Calcutta High Court, 1887) Introduction The case of Ahmed Mahomed Mahomed Jackariah v. Ahmed...
Limits on Certificated Guardians in Land Leases: Insights from Harendra Narain Singh Chowdhry v. T.D. Moran

Limits on Certificated Guardians in Land Leases: Insights from Harendra Narain Singh Chowdhry v. T.D. Moran

Date: Jun 28, 1887
Limits on Certificated Guardians in Land Leases: Insights from Harendra Narain Singh Chowdhry v. T.D. Moran Introduction The case of Harendra Narain Singh Chowdhry v. T.D. Moran adjudicated by the...
Sham Lall Case: Judicial Discretion in False Complaint Prosecutions

Sham Lall Case: Judicial Discretion in False Complaint Prosecutions

Date: Jun 23, 1887
Sham Lall Case: Judicial Discretion in False Complaint Prosecutions Introduction The case of Queen Empress v. Sham Lall ([1887] Calcutta High Court) addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Calcutta High Court Decision in Girwar Singh v. Thakur Narain Singh: Interpretation of Limitation Act Articles 132 and 147

Calcutta High Court Decision in Girwar Singh v. Thakur Narain Singh: Interpretation of Limitation Act Articles 132 and 147

Date: May 24, 1887
Calcutta High Court Decision in Girwar Singh v. Thakur Narain Singh: Interpretation of Limitation Act Articles 132 and 147 Introduction The case of Girwar Singh And On His Death v. Thakur Narain...
Corporate Incidental Powers in Labor Supply: Shamnugger Jute Factory Co. v. Ram Narain Chatterjee

Corporate Incidental Powers in Labor Supply: Shamnugger Jute Factory Co. v. Ram Narain Chatterjee

Date: Apr 21, 1886
Corporate Incidental Powers in Labor Supply: Shamnugger Jute Factory Co. v. Ram Narain Chatterjee Introduction The case of The Shamnugger Jute Factory Co. v. Ram Narain Chatterjee And Ors,...
Kali Kishen Tagore v. Golam Ali: Establishing Precedents on Tenant Rights and Declaratory Decrees

Kali Kishen Tagore v. Golam Ali: Establishing Precedents on Tenant Rights and Declaratory Decrees

Date: Mar 20, 1886
Kali Kishen Tagore v. Golam Ali: Establishing Precedents on Tenant Rights and Declaratory Decrees Introduction Kali Kishen Tagore v. Golam Ali is a seminal judgment rendered by the Calcutta High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert