Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Ismail Khan Mahomed v. Joygoon Bibee: Reaffirming the Non-Presumptive Nature of Permanent Tenancies in Absence of Explicit Agreement

Ismail Khan Mahomed v. Joygoon Bibee: Reaffirming the Non-Presumptive Nature of Permanent Tenancies in Absence of Explicit Agreement

Date: Jan 20, 1900
Ismail Khan Mahomed v. Joygoon Bibee: Reaffirming the Non-Presumptive Nature of Permanent Tenancies in Absence of Explicit Agreement Introduction The case of Ismail Khan Mahomed v. Joygoon Bibee...
Rai Nundo Lal Bose v. Nistamni Dassi: Limits of Counsel's Authority in Settlement Compromises

Rai Nundo Lal Bose v. Nistamni Dassi: Limits of Counsel's Authority in Settlement Compromises

Date: Jan 11, 1900
Rai Nundo Lal Bose v. Nistamni Dassi: Limits of Counsel's Authority in Settlement Compromises 1. Introduction The case of Rai Nundo Lal Bose v. Nistamni Dassi adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Recognition of Jain Customs in Succession and Adoption: Harnabh Pershad v. Mandil Dass

Recognition of Jain Customs in Succession and Adoption: Harnabh Pershad v. Mandil Dass

Date: Sep 7, 1899
Recognition of Jain Customs in Succession and Adoption: Harnabh Pershad Alias Rajajee v. Mandil Dass Introduction The case of Harnabh Pershad Alias Rajajee v. Mandil Dass adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Defining Accomplices and Admissibility of Their Testimonies in Indian Penal Code: Queen Empress v. Deodhar Singh

Defining Accomplices and Admissibility of Their Testimonies in Indian Penal Code: Queen Empress v. Deodhar Singh

Date: Sep 6, 1899
Defining Accomplices and Admissibility of Their Testimonies in Indian Penal Code: Queen Empress v. Deodhar Singh Introduction Queen Empress v. Deodhar Singh And Anr. is a landmark judgment delivered...
Impeaching Previous Decrees under Section 44 of the Evidence Act: Rajib Panda v. Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra And Ors.

Impeaching Previous Decrees under Section 44 of the Evidence Act: Rajib Panda v. Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra And Ors.

Date: Jul 19, 1899
Impeaching Previous Decrees under Section 44 of the Evidence Act: Rajib Panda v. Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra And Ors. Introduction The case of Rajib Panda v. Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra And Ors. adjudicated by...
Jadub Das v. The Queen Empress: Upholding the Integrity of Evidence Under the Code of Criminal Procedure

Jadub Das v. The Queen Empress: Upholding the Integrity of Evidence Under the Code of Criminal Procedure

Date: Jun 21, 1899
Jadub Das v. The Queen Empress: Upholding the Integrity of Evidence Under the Code of Criminal Procedure Introduction The case of Queen Empress v. Jadub Das, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Setting Aside Decrees Obtained by Fraud: Insights from Nistarini Dassi v. Nundo Lall Bose And Anr.

Setting Aside Decrees Obtained by Fraud: Insights from Nistarini Dassi v. Nundo Lall Bose And Anr.

Date: Jun 15, 1899
Setting Aside Decrees Obtained by Fraud: Insights from Nistarini Dassi v. Nundo Lall Bose And Anr. Introduction The landmark case of Nistarini Dassi v. Nundo Lall Bose And Anr., adjudicated by the...
The Authority of De Facto Managers to Sell Property in the Interest of a Minor

The Authority of De Facto Managers to Sell Property in the Interest of a Minor

Date: May 9, 1899
The Authority of De Facto Managers to Sell Property in the Interest of a Minor: Analysis of Mohanund Mondul v. Nafur Mondul And Ors. Introduction The case of Mohanund Mondul v. Nafur Mondul And Ors.,...
Durga Charan Mandal v. Kali Prasanna Sarkar: Clarifying the Saleability of Occupancy Holdings under the Code of Civil Procedure

Durga Charan Mandal v. Kali Prasanna Sarkar: Clarifying the Saleability of Occupancy Holdings under the Code of Civil Procedure

Date: Apr 20, 1899
Durga Charan Mandal v. Kali Prasanna Sarkar: Clarifying the Saleability of Occupancy Holdings under the Code of Civil Procedure Introduction The case Durga Charan Mandal And Anr. v. Kali Prasanna...
Calcutta High Court Judgment on Execution Sale and Co-tenancy Rights: Nitayi Behari Saha Paramanick v. Hari Govinda Saha And Ors

Calcutta High Court Judgment on Execution Sale and Co-tenancy Rights: Nitayi Behari Saha Paramanick v. Hari Govinda Saha And Ors

Date: Mar 18, 1899
Calcutta High Court Judgment on Execution Sale and Co-tenancy Rights: Nitayi Behari Saha Paramanick v. Hari Govinda Saha And Ors Introduction The case of Nitayi Behari Saha Paramanick And v. Hari...
Permanent Abatement Due to Administrative Error: Balkishen Das & Ors. v. Simpson

Permanent Abatement Due to Administrative Error: Balkishen Das & Ors. v. Simpson

Date: May 15, 1898
Permanent Abatement Due to Administrative Error: Balkishen Das & Ors. v. Simpson Introduction Balkishen Das and Ors. v. Simpson is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High Court on May 14,...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Re-trial Procedures in Gomir Sirdar v. The Queen-Empress

Calcutta High Court Upholds Re-trial Procedures in Gomir Sirdar v. The Queen-Empress

Date: May 13, 1898
Calcutta High Court Upholds Re-trial Procedures in Gomir Sirdar v. The Queen-Empress Introduction The case of Gomir Sirdar, Nagor Sheikh And Others v. The Queen-Empress On The Complaint Of Ali Sheikh...
Execution Applications and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Chunder Manna v. Gosain Das Kalay

Execution Applications and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Chunder Manna v. Gosain Das Kalay

Date: Jan 26, 1898
Execution Applications and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Chunder Manna v. Gosain Das Kalay Introduction The case of Gopal Chunder Manna And Ors. v. Gosain Das Kalay, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Reaffirmation of Executor's Role Under Hindu Wills: Insights from Sarat Chandra Banerjee v. Bhupendra Nath Basu

Reaffirmation of Executor's Role Under Hindu Wills: Insights from Sarat Chandra Banerjee v. Bhupendra Nath Basu

Date: Aug 4, 1897
Reaffirmation of Executor's Role Under Hindu Wills: Insights from Sarat Chandra Banerjee v. Bhupendra Nath Basu Introduction The landmark case of Sarat Chandra Banerjee and Anr. v. Bhupendra Nath...
Partition Transactions and Section 118 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Gyannessa v. Mobarakannessa

Partition Transactions and Section 118 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Gyannessa v. Mobarakannessa

Date: Jul 15, 1897
Partition Transactions and Section 118 of the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Gyannessa v. Mobarakannessa And Ors. Introduction Gyannessa And Ors. v. Mobarakannessa And Ors., adjudicated by...
Reaffirmation of Res Judicata Doctrine in Peary Mohun Mookerjee v. Ambica Churn Bandopadbya

Reaffirmation of Res Judicata Doctrine in Peary Mohun Mookerjee v. Ambica Churn Bandopadbya

Date: Jul 1, 1897
Reaffirmation of Res Judicata Doctrine in Peary Mohun Mookerjee v. Ambica Churn Bandopadbya Introduction The case of Peary Mohun Mookerjee v. Ambica Churn Bandopadbya adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Clarification on 'Good Faith' in Property Transfer under Section 53 Transfer of Property Act: Ishan Chunder Das Sirkar v. Bisoo Sirdar

Clarification on 'Good Faith' in Property Transfer under Section 53 Transfer of Property Act: Ishan Chunder Das Sirkar v. Bisoo Sirdar

Date: May 18, 1897
Clarification on 'Good Faith' in Property Transfer under Section 53 Transfer of Property Act Introduction The landmark case of Ishan Chunder Das Sirkar v. Bisoo Sirdar adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Forfeiture of Perpetual Leases Upon Repudiation: Insights from Kally Dass Ahiri v. Monmohini Dassee

Forfeiture of Perpetual Leases Upon Repudiation: Insights from Kally Dass Ahiri v. Monmohini Dassee

Date: Feb 13, 1897
Forfeiture of Perpetual Leases Upon Repudiation: Insights from Kally Dass Ahiri v. Monmohini Dassee Introduction Kally Dass Ahiri v. Monmohini Dassee is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Establishing Carrier Liability for Fire Damage: The Choutmull Doogur v. The Rivers Steam Navigation Decision

Establishing Carrier Liability for Fire Damage: The Choutmull Doogur v. The Rivers Steam Navigation Decision

Date: Jan 30, 1897
Establishing Carrier Liability for Fire Damage: The Choutmull Doogur v. The Rivers Steam Navigation Decision Introduction The case of Choutmull Doogur and Others v. The Rivers Steam Navigation,...
Apportionment and Suspension of Rent Due to Partial Interference: Dhunput Singh v. Mahomed Kazim Ispahain And Ors.

Apportionment and Suspension of Rent Due to Partial Interference: Dhunput Singh v. Mahomed Kazim Ispahain And Ors.

Date: Jul 11, 1896
Apportionment and Suspension of Rent Due to Partial Interference: Dhunput Singh v. Mahomed Kazim Ispahain And Ors. Introduction Dhunput Singh v. Mahomed Kazim Ispahain And Ors. is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert