Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

P.K. Chakravarty v. The King-Emperor: Clarifying Intent in Dissemination Under Section 108, Cr.P.C.

P.K. Chakravarty v. The King-Emperor: Clarifying Intent in Dissemination Under Section 108, Cr.P.C.

Date: Jul 31, 1926
P.K. Chakravarty v. The King-Emperor: Clarifying Intent in Dissemination Under Section 108, Cr.P.C. Introduction The case of P.K. Chakravarty v. The King-Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Interpretation of 'Road' under Article 146A of the Limitation Act in Anukul Chandra Chakravarti v. Chairman Of The Dacca District Board

Interpretation of 'Road' under Article 146A of the Limitation Act in Anukul Chandra Chakravarti v. Chairman Of The Dacca District Board

Date: Jul 14, 1926
Interpretation of 'Road' under Article 146A of the Limitation Act in Anukul Chandra Chakravarti v. Chairman Of The Dacca District Board Introduction The case of Anukul Chandra Chakravarti v. Chairman...
Validation of Absolute Dedication through Arpannama in Chandi Charan Das v. Dulal Paik

Validation of Absolute Dedication through Arpannama in Chandi Charan Das v. Dulal Paik

Date: Jun 17, 1926
Validation of Absolute Dedication through Arpannama in Chandi Charan Das v. Dulal Paik Introduction Chandi Charan Das v. Dulal Paik is a landmark case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on June...
Clarification on Jurisdiction and Validity of Decrees under Section 147A of the Bengal Tenancy Act

Clarification on Jurisdiction and Validity of Decrees under Section 147A of the Bengal Tenancy Act

Date: May 25, 1926
Clarification on Jurisdiction and Validity of Decrees under Section 147A of the Bengal Tenancy Act Introduction The case of Ishan Chandra Banikya v. Moomraj Khan, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Enforcement of Instalment Mortgage Bonds and Evidentiary Standards under Sections 68 and 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: A Commentary on Gobinda Chandra Pal v. Pulin Behary Banerji (1926)

Enforcement of Instalment Mortgage Bonds and Evidentiary Standards under Sections 68 and 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: A Commentary on Gobinda Chandra Pal v. Pulin Behary Banerji (1926)

Date: May 15, 1926
Enforcement of Instalment Mortgage Bonds and Evidentiary Standards under Sections 68 and 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: A Commentary on Gobinda Chandra Pal v. Pulin Behary Banerji (1926) Introduction...
Seputni Agreements and Equitable Rights: Jiban Krishna Mullik v. Nirupama Gupta

Seputni Agreements and Equitable Rights: Jiban Krishna Mullik v. Nirupama Gupta

Date: May 7, 1926
Seputni Agreements and Equitable Rights: Jiban Krishna Mullik v. Nirupama Gupta Introduction The case of Jiban Krishna Mullik v. Nirupama Gupta, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on May 6, 1926,...
Non-Applicability of Order 9, Rule 4 in Execution Proceedings and the Right to Fresh Application: Basaratulla v. Reazuddin

Non-Applicability of Order 9, Rule 4 in Execution Proceedings and the Right to Fresh Application: Basaratulla v. Reazuddin

Date: Mar 10, 1926
Non-Applicability of Order 9, Rule 4 in Execution Proceedings and the Right to Fresh Application: Basaratulla Mean And Ors. v. Reazuddin Mean And Ors. Opposite Pasty Introduction The case of...
Niranjan Mukherjee v. Sm. Soudamini Dasi And Ors.: Establishing Limits on Co-sharers' Authority in Partition Decrees

Niranjan Mukherjee v. Sm. Soudamini Dasi And Ors.: Establishing Limits on Co-sharers' Authority in Partition Decrees

Date: Feb 24, 1926
Niranjan Mukherjee v. Sm. Soudamini Dasi And Ors.: Establishing Limits on Co-sharers' Authority in Partition Decrees Introduction The landmark case of Niranjan Mukherjee v. Sm. Soudamini Dasi And...
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 47 Appealability for Decree-Holders as Auction-Purchasers

Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 47 Appealability for Decree-Holders as Auction-Purchasers

Date: Feb 24, 1926
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision on Section 47 Appealability for Decree-Holders as Auction-Purchasers 1. Introduction The Kailash Chandra Tarafdar v. Gopal Chandra Poddar case, adjudicated by...
Establishing Appellate Rights on Receiver Discharge Orders in Mortgage Cases: Ray Chaudhury v. Debi

Establishing Appellate Rights on Receiver Discharge Orders in Mortgage Cases: Ray Chaudhury v. Debi

Date: Jan 27, 1926
Establishing Appellate Rights on Receiver Discharge Orders in Mortgage Cases: Ray Chaudhury v. Debi Introduction The case of Manindra Chandra Ray Chaudhury And Another v. Suniti Bala Debi And...
Khijiruddin v. Emperor: Establishing Standards for Jury Charges and Evidence Admissibility

Khijiruddin v. Emperor: Establishing Standards for Jury Charges and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Aug 27, 1925
Khijiruddin v. Emperor: Establishing Standards for Jury Charges and Evidence Admissibility Introduction The case of Khijiruddin and Others v. Emperor was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Determining Criminal Negligence in Vehicular Incidents: H.W Smith v. The King-Emperor

Determining Criminal Negligence in Vehicular Incidents: H.W Smith v. The King-Emperor

Date: Aug 27, 1925
Determining Criminal Negligence in Vehicular Incidents: H.W Smith v. The King-Emperor Introduction The case of H.W Smith v. The King-Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 26,...
Succession to Impartible Estates under Mitakshara Hindu Law: Insights from Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad Singh

Succession to Impartible Estates under Mitakshara Hindu Law: Insights from Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad Singh

Date: Aug 18, 1925
Succession to Impartible Estates under Mitakshara Hindu Law: Insights from Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad Singh Introduction Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad Singh is a landmark...
Inalienability of Shebait's Spiritual Duties: Insights from Nagendra Nath Palit v. Robindra Narain Deb

Inalienability of Shebait's Spiritual Duties: Insights from Nagendra Nath Palit v. Robindra Narain Deb

Date: Aug 6, 1925
Inalienability of Shebait's Spiritual Duties: Insights from Nagendra Nath Palit v. Robindra Narain Deb Introduction The case of Nagendra Nath Palit v. Robindra Narain Deb adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Clarification of Limitation Period Under Article 109: Insights from Sarat Kamini Dasi v. Nagendra Nath Pal

Clarification of Limitation Period Under Article 109: Insights from Sarat Kamini Dasi v. Nagendra Nath Pal

Date: Jul 9, 1925
Clarification of Limitation Period Under Article 109: Insights from Sarat Kamini Dasi v. Nagendra Nath Pal Introduction Sarat Kamini Dasi v. Nagendra Nath Pal, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Prafulla Kamini Roy v. Bhabani Nath Roy: Clarifying Hindu Widow's Power of Alienation

Prafulla Kamini Roy v. Bhabani Nath Roy: Clarifying Hindu Widow's Power of Alienation

Date: Jul 9, 1925
Prafulla Kamini Roy v. Bhabani Nath Roy: Clarifying Hindu Widow's Power of Alienation Introduction The case of Prafulla Kamini Roy v. Bhabani Nath Roy, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July...
Expansion of Munsif Courts' Jurisdiction Over Mesne Profits in Bidyadhar Bachar v. Manindra Nath Das

Expansion of Munsif Courts' Jurisdiction Over Mesne Profits in Bidyadhar Bachar v. Manindra Nath Das

Date: Jun 16, 1925
Expansion of Munsif Courts' Jurisdiction Over Mesne Profits in Bidyadhar Bachar v. Manindra Nath Das Introduction The case of Bidyadhar Bachar And Ors. v. Manindra Nath Das And Ors. adjudicated by...
Clarification on Section 109 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Bar on Rent Enhancement Suits Post Withdrawal of Section 105 Application

Clarification on Section 109 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Bar on Rent Enhancement Suits Post Withdrawal of Section 105 Application

Date: May 7, 1925
Clarification on Section 109 of the Bengal Tenancy Act: Bar on Rent Enhancement Suits Post Withdrawal of Section 105 Application Introduction The case of Purna Chandra Chatterji v. Narendra Nath...
Clarification of Bengal Tenancy Act Section 109: Impact of Withdrawing Applications on Subsequent Rent Enhancement Suits

Clarification of Bengal Tenancy Act Section 109: Impact of Withdrawing Applications on Subsequent Rent Enhancement Suits

Date: May 7, 1925
Clarification of Bengal Tenancy Act Section 109: Impact of Withdrawing Applications on Subsequent Rent Enhancement Suits Introduction The case of Purna Chandra Chatterjee v. Narendra Nath Chowdhury,...
Ramjoo Mahomed v. Haridas Mullick And Others: Establishing the Necessity of Registration for Lease Agreements

Ramjoo Mahomed v. Haridas Mullick And Others: Establishing the Necessity of Registration for Lease Agreements

Date: May 2, 1925
Ramjoo Mahomed v. Haridas Mullick And Others: Establishing the Necessity of Registration for Lease Agreements Introduction The case of Ramjoo Mahomed v. Haridas Mullick And Others adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert