Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Calcutta High Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Execution of Decrees under Bengal Tenancy Act

Calcutta High Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Execution of Decrees under Bengal Tenancy Act

Date: Feb 28, 1942
Calcutta High Court Establishes Clear Guidelines on Execution of Decrees under Bengal Tenancy Act Introduction The case of Satish Chandra Hui And Ors. v. Sudhir Krishna Ghosh And Anr., adjudicated by...
Appealability of Dismissals for Non-Payment of Court Fees: Insights from Abdul Majid Mridiia v. Amina Khatun

Appealability of Dismissals for Non-Payment of Court Fees: Insights from Abdul Majid Mridiia v. Amina Khatun

Date: Feb 27, 1942
Appealability of Dismissals for Non-Payment of Court Fees: Insights from Abdul Majid Mridiia v. Amina Khatun Introduction The case of Abdul Majid Mridiia v. Amina Khatun adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Establishing the Validity of Debutters in Religious Property Dedications: Purna Chandra Chakrabarty v. Kalipada Roy

Establishing the Validity of Debutters in Religious Property Dedications: Purna Chandra Chakrabarty v. Kalipada Roy

Date: Feb 19, 1942
Establishing the Validity of Debutters in Religious Property Dedications: Purna Chandra Chakrabarty v. Kalipada Roy Introduction Purna Chandra Chakrabarty v. Kalipada Roy, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Consideration and Forfeiture in Negotiable Instruments: Insights from Ramani Mohan Bhattacharjee v. Surjya Kumar Dhar

Consideration and Forfeiture in Negotiable Instruments: Insights from Ramani Mohan Bhattacharjee v. Surjya Kumar Dhar

Date: Dec 18, 1941
Consideration and Forfeiture in Negotiable Instruments: Insights from Ramani Mohan Bhattacharjee v. Surjya Kumar Dhar Introduction The case of Ramani Mohan Bhattacharjee v. Surjya Kumar Dhar,...
Substitution of Legal Representatives in Execution Proceedings and Limitation Act: Annada Prasad Mitra v. Sushil Kumar Mandal

Substitution of Legal Representatives in Execution Proceedings and Limitation Act: Annada Prasad Mitra v. Sushil Kumar Mandal

Date: Dec 12, 1941
Substitution of Legal Representatives in Execution Proceedings and Limitation Act: Annada Prasad Mitra v. Sushil Kumar Mandal 1. Introduction Annada Prasad Mitra v. Sushil Kumar Mandal, adjudicated...
Mandating Proof of Special Damage in Public Nuisance Suits: Surendra Kumar Basu v. District Board Of Nadia

Mandating Proof of Special Damage in Public Nuisance Suits: Surendra Kumar Basu v. District Board Of Nadia

Date: Dec 2, 1941
Mandating Proof of Special Damage in Public Nuisance Suits: Surendra Kumar Basu v. District Board Of Nadia Introduction The landmark case of Surendra Kumar Basu v. District Board Of Nadia,...
High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Section 144 Injunctions: Rashid Allidina v. Jiwandas-Khemji

High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Section 144 Injunctions: Rashid Allidina v. Jiwandas-Khemji

Date: Nov 4, 1941
High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Section 144 Injunctions: Rashid Allidina v. Jiwandas-Khemji Introduction Rashid Allidina v. Jiwandas-Khemji And Anr. is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Supremacy of Section 162 CrPC Over Section 27 Evidence Act: Insights from Naresh Chandra Das And Anr. v. King-Emperor

Supremacy of Section 162 CrPC Over Section 27 Evidence Act: Insights from Naresh Chandra Das And Anr. v. King-Emperor

Date: Aug 29, 1941
Supremacy of Section 162 CrPC Over Section 27 Evidence Act: Insights from Naresh Chandra Das And Anr. v. King-Emperor Introduction The case of Naresh Chandra Das And Anr. v. King-Emperor, adjudicated...
Jurisdiction for Execution of Decree Under Section 37 CPC: Insights from Masrab Khan v. Debnath Mali

Jurisdiction for Execution of Decree Under Section 37 CPC: Insights from Masrab Khan v. Debnath Mali

Date: Aug 12, 1941
Jurisdiction for Execution of Decree Under Section 37 CPC: Insights from Masrab Khan v. Debnath Mali Introduction Masrab Khan v. Debnath Mali is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Haji Mahammad Nabi Shirazi v. Province Of Bengal: Precedent on Section 92 and Public Religious Trusts

Haji Mahammad Nabi Shirazi v. Province Of Bengal: Precedent on Section 92 and Public Religious Trusts

Date: Aug 7, 1941
Haji Mahammad Nabi Shirazi v. Province Of Bengal: Precedent on Section 92 and Public Religious Trusts Introduction The case of Haji Mahammad Nabi Shirazi v. Province Of Bengal was adjudicated by the...
Deed of Gift Validity and Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Commentary on Srimati Radharani Dassi v. Srimati Binodamoyee Dassi

Deed of Gift Validity and Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Commentary on Srimati Radharani Dassi v. Srimati Binodamoyee Dassi

Date: Jul 26, 1941
Deed of Gift Validity and Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Commentary on Srimati Radharani Dassi v. Srimati Binodamoyee Dassi Introduction The case of Srimati Radharani Dassi v. Srimati Binodamoyee...
Validity of Adoption under Hindu Trigotra Rules: Anilabala Debi v. Madhabendu Narain Roy

Validity of Adoption under Hindu Trigotra Rules: Anilabala Debi v. Madhabendu Narain Roy

Date: Jul 19, 1941
Validity of Adoption under Hindu Trigotra Rules Introduction The case of Anilabala Debi v. Madhabendu Narain Roy adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July 18, 1941, delves into the complexities...
Inherent Jurisdiction in Estate Management During Appellate Proceedings: Ramendra Narayan Roy v. Sm. Bibhabati Debi

Inherent Jurisdiction in Estate Management During Appellate Proceedings: Ramendra Narayan Roy v. Sm. Bibhabati Debi

Date: Jul 17, 1941
Inherent Jurisdiction in Estate Management During Appellate Proceedings: Ramendra Narayan Roy v. Sm. Bibhabati Debi Introduction Ramendra Narayan Roy And Anr. S, v. Sm. Bibhabati Debi And Ors. is a...
Expanded Interpretation of 'Custody' under the Guardians and Wards Act: Jwala Prosad Saha v. Bachu Lal Gupta

Expanded Interpretation of 'Custody' under the Guardians and Wards Act: Jwala Prosad Saha v. Bachu Lal Gupta

Date: Jul 11, 1941
Expanded Interpretation of 'Custody' under the Guardians and Wards Act: Jwala Prosad Saha v. Bachu Lal Gupta Introduction The case of Jwala Prosad Saha v. Bachu Lal Gupta was adjudicated by the...
Privity of Contract and Trustee Exceptions in Jnan Chandra Mukherji v. Mano Ranjan Mitra

Privity of Contract and Trustee Exceptions in Jnan Chandra Mukherji v. Mano Ranjan Mitra

Date: Jun 28, 1941
Privity of Contract and Trustee Exceptions in Jnan Chandra Mukherji v. Mano Ranjan Mitra Introduction The case of Jnan Chandra Mukherji v. Mano Ranjan Mitra was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Protections for Deity-Owned Properties in Tarit Bhusan Ray v. Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Salgram Sila Thakur

Calcutta High Court Establishes Protections for Deity-Owned Properties in Tarit Bhusan Ray v. Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Salgram Sila Thakur

Date: Jun 17, 1941
Calcutta High Court Establishes Protections for Deity-Owned Properties in Tarit Bhusan Ray v. Sree Sree Iswar Sridhar Salgram Sila Thakur Introduction The case of Tarit Bhusan Ray v. Sree Sree Iswar...
Doctrine of Res Judicata in Wakf Property Claims: Hafiz Mahammad Fateh Nasib v. Swarup Chand Hukum Chand

Doctrine of Res Judicata in Wakf Property Claims: Hafiz Mahammad Fateh Nasib v. Swarup Chand Hukum Chand

Date: May 29, 1941
Doctrine of Res Judicata in Wakf Property Claims: Hafiz Mahammad Fateh Nasib v. Swarup Chand Hukum Chand Introduction Hafiz Mahammad Fateh Nasib v. Swarup Chand Hukum Chand is a landmark judgment...
Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Validating Wakf under Shia Law in Nawab Syed Mahammad Hashim Ali Khan’s Case

Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Validating Wakf under Shia Law in Nawab Syed Mahammad Hashim Ali Khan’s Case

Date: May 21, 1941
Calcutta High Court Sets Precedent on Validating Wakf under Shia Law in Nawab Syed Mahammad Hashim Ali Khan’s Case Introduction The case of Nawab Syed Mahammad Hashim Ali Khan v. Iffat Ara Hamidi...
Partial Partition and Compensation Rights: Hemanta Kumar Banerjee v. Satish Chandra Banerjee

Partial Partition and Compensation Rights: Hemanta Kumar Banerjee v. Satish Chandra Banerjee

Date: Apr 2, 1941
Partial Partition and Compensation Rights: Hemanta Kumar Banerjee v. Satish Chandra Banerjee Introduction The case of Hemanta Kumar Banerjee v. Satish Chandra Banerjee adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Promissory Notes and Provincial Legislation: Insights from Harsukdas Balkissendas v. Dhirendra Nath Roy

Promissory Notes and Provincial Legislation: Insights from Harsukdas Balkissendas v. Dhirendra Nath Roy

Date: Mar 12, 1941
Promissory Notes and Provincial Legislation: Insights from Harsukdas Balkissendas v. Dhirendra Nath Roy Introduction The case of Harsukdas Balkissendas v. Dhirendra Nath Roy adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert