Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

No Right of Further Appeal from Single Judge Decisions under the Trade Marks Act, 1940

No Right of Further Appeal from Single Judge Decisions under the Trade Marks Act, 1940

Date: May 29, 1946
No Right of Further Appeal from Single Judge Decisions under the Trade Marks Act, 1940 Introduction In the landmark case of India Electric Works Ltd. v. The Registrar Of Trade Marks (Calcutta High...
Restitution and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Laskar vs. Harihar Mukherjee

Restitution and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Laskar vs. Harihar Mukherjee

Date: May 10, 1946
Restitution and Limitation: Insights from Gopal Laskar Petitioner v. Harihar Mukherjee And Anr. Introduction The case of Gopal Laskar Petitioner v. Harihar Mukherjee And Anr. adjudicated by the...
Ownership and Tax Assessment of Lease-Erected Structures: Ballygunge Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Ownership and Tax Assessment of Lease-Erected Structures: Ballygunge Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Apr 13, 1946
Ownership and Tax Assessment of Lease-Erected Structures: Ballygunge Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ballygunge Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by...
Preservation of Landlord's Right of Pre-emption Post Bengal Tenancy Act Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jatindra Nath De v. Jetu Mahato & Ors.

Preservation of Landlord's Right of Pre-emption Post Bengal Tenancy Act Amendment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jatindra Nath De v. Jetu Mahato & Ors.

Date: Apr 13, 1946
Preservation of Landlord's Right of Pre-emption Post Bengal Tenancy Act Amendment Jatindra Nath De v. Jetu Mahato & Ors. Opposite Parties - Calcutta High Court, 1946 Introduction The case of Jatindra...
Adverse Possession and Managerial Authority in Endowed Property: Insights from Hemanta Kumari Bose v. Iswar Sridhar Jew

Adverse Possession and Managerial Authority in Endowed Property: Insights from Hemanta Kumari Bose v. Iswar Sridhar Jew

Date: Mar 28, 1946
Adverse Possession and Managerial Authority in Endowed Property: Insights from Hemanta Kumari Bose v. Iswar Sridhar Jew Introduction Hemanta Kumari Bose v. Iswar Sridhar Jew is a landmark judgment...
Interpretation of "Appeal" under Article 182 of the Indian Limitation Act: Habis Chandra Chowdhury v. Dines Chandra Chowdhury & Anr.

Interpretation of "Appeal" under Article 182 of the Indian Limitation Act: Habis Chandra Chowdhury v. Dines Chandra Chowdhury & Anr.

Date: Mar 2, 1946
Interpretation of "Appeal" under Article 182 of the Indian Limitation Act: Habis Chandra Chowdhury v. Dines Chandra Chowdhury & Anr. Introduction The landmark case of Habis Chandra Chowdhury v. Dines...
Compensation Principles in Requisition of Public Land: Province of Bengal v. Board of Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta

Compensation Principles in Requisition of Public Land: Province of Bengal v. Board of Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta

Date: Feb 21, 1946
Compensation Principles in Requisition of Public Land: Province of Bengal v. Board of Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta Introduction The case of The Province Of Bengal v. The Board Of Trustees...
Concurrent Jurisdiction of Income Tax Officers in Multi-Branch Businesses: Tarak Nath Bagchi v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Concurrent Jurisdiction of Income Tax Officers in Multi-Branch Businesses: Tarak Nath Bagchi v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 5, 1946
Concurrent Jurisdiction of Income Tax Officers in Multi-Branch Businesses: Tarak Nath Bagchi v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Tarak Nath Bagchi v. The Commissioner Of...
Superseding Arbitration Through Compromise: Insights from Prafulla Chandra Karmakar v. Panchanan Karmakar

Superseding Arbitration Through Compromise: Insights from Prafulla Chandra Karmakar v. Panchanan Karmakar

Date: Dec 19, 1945
Superseding Arbitration Through Compromise: Insights from Prafulla Chandra Karmakar v. Panchanan Karmakar Introduction Prafulla Chandra Karmakar And Anr. v. Panchanan Karmakar & Anr. is a landmark...
Reaffirmation of Strict Admissibility Standards for Joint Statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act

Reaffirmation of Strict Admissibility Standards for Joint Statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Sep 27, 1945
Reaffirmation of Strict Admissibility Standards for Joint Statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of Abdul Kader And Ors. Accused v. The King-Emperor adjudicated...
Clarifying the Assessment of Hats Under the Bengal Cess Act: Province of Bengal v. Hingal Kumari Law

Clarifying the Assessment of Hats Under the Bengal Cess Act: Province of Bengal v. Hingal Kumari Law

Date: Aug 11, 1945
Clarifying the Assessment of Hats Under the Bengal Cess Act: Province of Bengal v. Hingal Kumari Law Introduction The case of Province Of Bengal v. Hingal Kumari Law (Calcutta High Court, August 10,...
Admissibility of Historical Maps in Land Disputes: Insights from Dwijesh Chandra Roy v. Naresh Chandra Gupta

Admissibility of Historical Maps in Land Disputes: Insights from Dwijesh Chandra Roy v. Naresh Chandra Gupta

Date: Jul 21, 1945
Admissibility of Historical Maps in Land Disputes: Insights from Dwijesh Chandra Roy v. Naresh Chandra Gupta Introduction The case of Dwijesh Chandra Roy v. Naresh Chandra Gupta adjudicated by the...
Declaratory Relief on Contingent Rights under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Tarak Chandra Das v. Anukul Chandra Mukherjee

Declaratory Relief on Contingent Rights under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Tarak Chandra Das v. Anukul Chandra Mukherjee

Date: Jul 4, 1945
Declaratory Relief on Contingent Rights under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Tarak Chandra Das v. Anukul Chandra Mukherjee 1. Introduction The case of Tarak Chandra Das v. Anukul Chandra...
Defining the Standing of Receivers in Execution Proceedings: Satyanarayan Banerji v. Kalyani Prosad Singh Deo Bahadur And Others

Defining the Standing of Receivers in Execution Proceedings: Satyanarayan Banerji v. Kalyani Prosad Singh Deo Bahadur And Others

Date: May 29, 1945
Defining the Standing of Receivers in Execution Proceedings: Satyanarayan Banerji v. Kalyani Prosad Singh Deo Bahadur And Others Introduction The case of Satyanarayan Banerji And Another v. Kalyani...
Interpretation of 'Entertain' under Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Judgment

Interpretation of 'Entertain' under Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Judgment

Date: May 5, 1945
Interpretation of 'Entertain' under Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Nakul Chandra Ghose And Ors. v. Shyama Pada Ghose decided by the...
Non-Registration of Arbitration Award Involving Immovable Property Renders Award Partially Unenforceable

Non-Registration of Arbitration Award Involving Immovable Property Renders Award Partially Unenforceable

Date: Mar 29, 1945
Non-Registration of Arbitration Award Involving Immovable Property Renders Award Partially Unenforceable Introduction The case of Anandi Lal Poddar v. Keshavdeo Poddar, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Enforcement of Mortgage Bonds in the Absence of Attesting Witnesses: Amal Sankar Sen v. Dacca Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. (1945)

Enforcement of Mortgage Bonds in the Absence of Attesting Witnesses: Amal Sankar Sen v. Dacca Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. (1945)

Date: Mar 20, 1945
Enforcement of Mortgage Bonds in the Absence of Attesting Witnesses: Amal Sankar Sen v. Dacca Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. (1945) Introduction The landmark case of Amal Sankar Sen v. Dacca...
Prem Sukh Gulgulia v. Habib Ullah: Reinforcement of Section 66(2) in Benami Transactions

Prem Sukh Gulgulia v. Habib Ullah: Reinforcement of Section 66(2) in Benami Transactions

Date: Feb 28, 1945
Prem Sukh Gulgulia v. Habib Ullah: Reinforcement of Section 66(2) in Benami Transactions Introduction The case of Prem Sukh Gulgulia And Another v. Habib Ullah And Others, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Revocability of Licenses in Property Law: Analysis of Arpan Ali v. Jnanendra Kumar Pal Choudhury

Revocability of Licenses in Property Law: Analysis of Arpan Ali v. Jnanendra Kumar Pal Choudhury

Date: Feb 24, 1945
Revocability of Licenses in Property Law: Analysis of Arpan Ali v. Jnanendra Kumar Pal Choudhury Introduction The case of Arpan Ali v. Jnanendra Kumar Pal Choudhury, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Establishing Jurisdiction Through Assignment: Comprehensive Analysis of Madanlal Jalan v. Madanlal And Ors.

Establishing Jurisdiction Through Assignment: Comprehensive Analysis of Madanlal Jalan v. Madanlal And Ors.

Date: Feb 21, 1945
Establishing Jurisdiction Through Assignment: Comprehensive Analysis of Madanlal Jalan v. Madanlal And Ors. Introduction Madanlal Jalan v. Madanlal And Ors., adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert