Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Determining Winding-Up Orders in the Context of Disputed Debt Payment Schemes

Determining Winding-Up Orders in the Context of Disputed Debt Payment Schemes

Date: Jan 12, 1954
Determining Winding-Up Orders in the Context of Disputed Debt Payment Schemes Introduction The case of Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Mahaluxmi Cotton Mills Ltd. adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Invalidity of Certificate Proceedings under Public Demands Recovery Act

Invalidity of Certificate Proceedings under Public Demands Recovery Act

Date: Jan 9, 1954
Invalidity of Certificate Proceedings under Public Demands Recovery Act Introduction The case of Abanindra Kumar Maity Certificate-Debtor v. A.K Biswas, Certificate Officer Of Midnapore Opposite...
Strict Application of Order 9, Rule 5 C.P.C. in Dismissal of Suits: Shaw & Co. v. Sisir Mukherjee

Strict Application of Order 9, Rule 5 C.P.C. in Dismissal of Suits: Shaw & Co. v. Sisir Mukherjee

Date: Dec 24, 1953
Strict Application of Order 9, Rule 5 C.P.C. in Dismissal of Suits: Shaw & Co. v. Sisir Mukherjee Introduction Shaw & Co. v. Sisir Mukherjee is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta High...
Admiralty Jurisdiction in Indian Context: The Precedent Set by Jayaswal Shipping Company v. Owners & Parties Interested In Steamship S.S Leelavati

Admiralty Jurisdiction in Indian Context: The Precedent Set by Jayaswal Shipping Company v. Owners & Parties Interested In Steamship S.S Leelavati

Date: Dec 24, 1953
Admiralty Jurisdiction in Indian Context: The Precedent Set by Jayaswal Shipping Company v. Owners & Parties Interested In Steamship S.S Leelavati Introduction The case of Jayaswal Shipping Company...
Amarendra Narayan Roy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal: Upholding the Legality of Disclosure Proceedings

Amarendra Narayan Roy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal: Upholding the Legality of Disclosure Proceedings

Date: Dec 19, 1953
Amarendra Narayan Roy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal: Upholding the Legality of Disclosure Proceedings Introduction The case of Amarendra Narayan Roy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West...
Strict Compliance with Statutory Notices in Winding-Up Proceedings: Insights from Bukhtiarpur Bihar Light Railway Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India And Another

Strict Compliance with Statutory Notices in Winding-Up Proceedings: Insights from Bukhtiarpur Bihar Light Railway Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India And Another

Date: Dec 18, 1953
Strict Compliance with Statutory Notices in Winding-Up Proceedings: Insights from Bukhtiarpur Bihar Light Railway Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India And Another Introduction The case of Bukhtiarpur Bihar...
Valuation of Process Stock for Tax Purposes: Insights from Patrick v. Broadstone Mills Ltd.

Valuation of Process Stock for Tax Purposes: Insights from Patrick v. Broadstone Mills Ltd.

Date: Dec 12, 1953
Valuation of Process Stock for Tax Purposes: Insights from Patrick v. Broadstone Mills Ltd. Introduction The case of Patrick (Inspector Of Taxes) v. Broadstone Mills Ltd., adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Affirming Principal Role and Validating Partnership Registration in Sohanlal Pachisia & Co. v. Bilasray Khemani

Affirming Principal Role and Validating Partnership Registration in Sohanlal Pachisia & Co. v. Bilasray Khemani

Date: Dec 12, 1953
Affirming Principal Role and Validating Partnership Registration in Sohanlal Pachisia & Co. v. Bilasray Khemani Introduction The case of Sohanlal Pachisia & Co. v. Bilasray Khemani, adjudicated by...
Nandram Hanutram v. Raghunath & Sons Ltd.: Clarifying the Existence of Disputes in Arbitration Clauses

Nandram Hanutram v. Raghunath & Sons Ltd.: Clarifying the Existence of Disputes in Arbitration Clauses

Date: Dec 11, 1953
Nandram Hanutram v. Raghunath & Sons Ltd.: Clarifying the Existence of Disputes in Arbitration Clauses Introduction Nandram Hanutram v. Raghunath & Sons Ltd. is a pivotal case decided by the Calcutta...
Haji Md. Vakil v. Commissioner of Police: Mandating Written Reasons for License Cancellation under Section 18, Indian Arms Act

Haji Md. Vakil v. Commissioner of Police: Mandating Written Reasons for License Cancellation under Section 18, Indian Arms Act

Date: Nov 28, 1953
Haji Md. Vakil v. Commissioner of Police: Mandating Written Reasons for License Cancellation under Section 18, Indian Arms Act Introduction The case of Haji Md. Vakil v. Commissioner of Police was...
Continuity of Pending Proceedings After Legislative Amendment: Deorajin Debi v. Satyadhan Ghosal

Continuity of Pending Proceedings After Legislative Amendment: Deorajin Debi v. Satyadhan Ghosal

Date: Sep 10, 1953
Continuity of Pending Proceedings After Legislative Amendment: Deorajin Debi v. Satyadhan Ghosal Introduction In the landmark case of Deorajin Debi v. Satyadhan Ghosal, decided by the Calcutta High...
Clarifying the Scope of Final Orders under Article 133(1): Insights from West Jamuria Coal Company v. Bholanath Roy

Clarifying the Scope of Final Orders under Article 133(1): Insights from West Jamuria Coal Company v. Bholanath Roy

Date: Sep 5, 1953
Clarifying the Scope of Final Orders under Article 133(1): Insights from West Jamuria Coal Company v. Bholanath Roy Introduction The landmark case of West Jamuria Coal Company v. Bholanath Roy and...
Limitation Periods in Arbitration Challenges: Shah And Co. v. Ishar Singh Kirpal Singh And Co.

Limitation Periods in Arbitration Challenges: Shah And Co. v. Ishar Singh Kirpal Singh And Co.

Date: Sep 4, 1953
Limitation Periods in Arbitration Challenges: Shah And Co. v. Ishar Singh Kirpal Singh And Co. 1. Introduction Shah And Co. v. Ishar Singh Kirpal Singh And Co. is a seminal case decided by the...
Union of India v. Gujarat Tobacco Co.: Establishing Standards for Carrier Liability, Notice, and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act

Union of India v. Gujarat Tobacco Co.: Establishing Standards for Carrier Liability, Notice, and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act

Date: Aug 27, 1953
Union of India v. Gujarat Tobacco Co.: Establishing Standards for Carrier Liability, Notice, and Limitation Period under the Indian Railways Act Introduction The case of Union of India v. Messrs....
Enforcement of Statutory Remedies in Municipal Election Disputes: An Analysis of Narayan Chandra Mukherjee v. District Magistrate

Enforcement of Statutory Remedies in Municipal Election Disputes: An Analysis of Narayan Chandra Mukherjee v. District Magistrate

Date: Aug 14, 1953
Enforcement of Statutory Remedies in Municipal Election Disputes: An Analysis of Narayan Chandra Mukherjee v. District Magistrate Introduction The case of Narayan Chandra Mukherjee v. District...
Retrospective Suspension of Government Employees: Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. S.N Mukherjee

Retrospective Suspension of Government Employees: Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. S.N Mukherjee

Date: Aug 12, 1953
Retrospective Suspension of Government Employees: Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. S.N Mukherjee Introduction The case of Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee v. S.N Mukherjee was adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Punishments: Jatindra Nath Biswas v. R. Gupta Superintendent Of Police

Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Punishments: Jatindra Nath Biswas v. R. Gupta Superintendent Of Police

Date: Aug 11, 1953
Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Punishments: Jatindra Nath Biswas v. R. Gupta Superintendent Of Police Introduction The case of Jatindra Nath Biswas v. R. Gupta Superintendent Of...
Director Representation in Industrial Tribunals: Hall And Anderson, Ltd. v. S.K. Neogi And Anr.

Director Representation in Industrial Tribunals: Hall And Anderson, Ltd. v. S.K. Neogi And Anr.

Date: Jul 31, 1953
Director Representation in Industrial Tribunals: Hall And Anderson, Ltd. v. S.K. Neogi And Anr. Introduction The case Hall And Anderson, Ltd. v. S.K. Neogi And Anr. is a landmark judgment delivered...
Establishing the Authority of Successor-in-Office under Section 559 of Criminal Procedure Code: Bholanath Dhar v. Gour Gopal Chakraborty

Establishing the Authority of Successor-in-Office under Section 559 of Criminal Procedure Code: Bholanath Dhar v. Gour Gopal Chakraborty

Date: Jul 25, 1953
Establishing the Authority of Successor-in-Office under Section 559 of Criminal Procedure Code: Bholanath Dhar v. Gour Gopal Chakraborty Introduction The case of Bholanath Dhar & Ors. v. Gour Gopal...
Clarifying Suspension Under Article 311: Shiva Nandan Sinha v. State of West Bengal

Clarifying Suspension Under Article 311: Shiva Nandan Sinha v. State of West Bengal

Date: Jul 22, 1953
Clarifying Suspension Under Article 311: Shiva Nandan Sinha v. State of West Bengal Introduction Shiva Nandan Sinha v. State of West Bengal is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert