Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

R.C. Mitter And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Requirements for Partnership Registration under Section 26-A

R.C. Mitter And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Requirements for Partnership Registration under Section 26-A

Date: Aug 27, 1955
R.C. Mitter And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Clarifying the Requirements for Partnership Registration under Section 26-A Introduction The case of R.C. Mitter And Sons v. Commissioner Of...
D.C. Auddy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Treatment of Unexplained Cash Credits as Income from Undisclosed Sources

D.C. Auddy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Treatment of Unexplained Cash Credits as Income from Undisclosed Sources

Date: Aug 27, 1955
D.C. Auddy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Treatment of Unexplained Cash Credits as Income from Undisclosed Sources Introduction The case of D.C. Auddy v. Commissioner of Income-Tax adjudicated by the...
Malchand Surana Service of Notice: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Judgment

Malchand Surana Service of Notice: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Judgment

Date: Aug 25, 1955
Malchand Surana Service of Notice: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Malchand Surana adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 24,...
Self-Incrimination Protections in Customs Proceedings: Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Collector Of Customs And Ors.

Self-Incrimination Protections in Customs Proceedings: Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Collector Of Customs And Ors.

Date: Aug 10, 1955
Self-Incrimination Protections in Customs Proceedings: Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Collector Of Customs And Ors. Introduction The landmark case of Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. v. Collector Of Customs And...
Limitations on Contesting Legislative Acts Post-Utilization: Insights from Abanindra Kumar Maity v. A.K Majumdar And Ors.

Limitations on Contesting Legislative Acts Post-Utilization: Insights from Abanindra Kumar Maity v. A.K Majumdar And Ors.

Date: Aug 6, 1955
Limitations on Contesting Legislative Acts Post-Utilization: Insights from Abanindra Kumar Maity v. A.K Majumdar And Ors. Introduction The case of Abanindra Kumar Maity v. A.K Majumdar And Ors.,...
Strengthening Auditor Duties and Accountability: Calcutta High Court in Deputy Secretary v. S.N Das Gupta

Strengthening Auditor Duties and Accountability: Calcutta High Court in Deputy Secretary v. S.N Das Gupta

Date: Aug 2, 1955
Strengthening Auditor Duties and Accountability: Calcutta High Court in Deputy Secretary v. S.N Das Gupta Introduction The case of Deputy Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance...
Enforceability of Government Contracts and Limitations on Refund Claims: Anath Bandhu Deb v. Dominion of India

Enforceability of Government Contracts and Limitations on Refund Claims: Anath Bandhu Deb v. Dominion of India

Date: Jul 12, 1955
Enforceability of Government Contracts and Limitations on Refund Claims Introduction The case of Anath Bandhu Deb v. Dominion of India adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July 11, 1955,...
Admissibility of Certified Copies under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Kotiswar Mukherjee v. Paresh Nath Mukherjee

Admissibility of Certified Copies under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Kotiswar Mukherjee v. Paresh Nath Mukherjee

Date: Jul 8, 1955
Admissibility of Certified Copies under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Kotiswar Mukherjee v. Paresh Nath Mukherjee Introduction The landmark case of Kotiswar Mukherjee And Ors. v....
Manindra Nath Pal v. Baranagar Municipality: Establishing Municipal Obligation to Supply Sufficient Filtered Water

Manindra Nath Pal v. Baranagar Municipality: Establishing Municipal Obligation to Supply Sufficient Filtered Water

Date: Jun 28, 1955
Manindra Nath Pal v. Baranagar Municipality: Establishing Municipal Obligation to Supply Sufficient Filtered Water Introduction The case of Manindra Nath Pal and Others v. Municipal Commissioners Of...
Priority of State Tax Claims Over Other Creditors: Builders Supply Corporation v. Union Of India

Priority of State Tax Claims Over Other Creditors: Builders Supply Corporation v. Union Of India

Date: Jun 22, 1955
Priority of State Tax Claims Over Other Creditors: Builders Supply Corporation v. Union Of India Introduction The landmark case of Builders Supply Corporation v. Union Of India was adjudicated by the...
Tenant's Entitlement to Remove Structures Post-Lease: India Electric Works Ltd. v. Mrs. B.S Mantosh And Others

Tenant's Entitlement to Remove Structures Post-Lease: India Electric Works Ltd. v. Mrs. B.S Mantosh And Others

Date: Jun 14, 1955
Tenant's Entitlement to Remove Structures Post-Lease: Insights from India Electric Works Ltd. v. Mrs. B.S Mantosh And Others Introduction The case of India Electric Works Ltd. v. Mrs. B.S Mantosh And...
Judicial Prohibition of Piecemeal Land Acquisition Under the Land Acquisition Act: Corporation of Calcutta v. Omeda Khatun Bewa

Judicial Prohibition of Piecemeal Land Acquisition Under the Land Acquisition Act: Corporation of Calcutta v. Omeda Khatun Bewa

Date: Jun 10, 1955
Judicial Prohibition of Piecemeal Land Acquisition Under the Land Acquisition Act Corporation of Calcutta v. Omeda Khatun Bewa Calcutta High Court, 1955 Introduction The case of Corporation of...
Discretionary Retirement at 55 for Ministerial Railway Employees: Basanta Kumar Pal v. Chief Electrical Engineer

Discretionary Retirement at 55 for Ministerial Railway Employees: Basanta Kumar Pal v. Chief Electrical Engineer

Date: Jun 9, 1955
Discretionary Retirement at 55 for Ministerial Railway Employees: Basanta Kumar Pal v. Chief Electrical Engineer Introduction Basanta Kumar Pal v. The Chief Electrical Engineer And Ors. is a landmark...
Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Suit for Jurisdictional Conflicts: Hansraj Bajaj v. Text Indian Overseas Bank Ltd.

Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Suit for Jurisdictional Conflicts: Hansraj Bajaj v. Text Indian Overseas Bank Ltd.

Date: Jun 4, 1955
Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Suit for Jurisdictional Conflicts: Hansraj Bajaj v. Text Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. Introduction The case of Hansraj Bajaj v. Text Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. adjudicated...
Clarification on Bank's Duty and Liability in Altered Cheque Cases: Brahma Shum Shere Jung Bahadur v. Chartered Bank Of India

Clarification on Bank's Duty and Liability in Altered Cheque Cases: Brahma Shum Shere Jung Bahadur v. Chartered Bank Of India

Date: Jun 2, 1955
Clarification on Bank's Duty and Liability in Altered Cheque Cases Brahma Shum Shere Jung Bahadur v. Chartered Bank Of India Calcutta High Court, 1955 Introduction The case of Brahma Shum Shere Jung...
Kashiram Agarwalla v. Collector Of 24-Parganas: Jurisdiction of Collector in Income Tax Recovery

Kashiram Agarwalla v. Collector Of 24-Parganas: Jurisdiction of Collector in Income Tax Recovery

Date: May 27, 1955
Kashiram Agarwalla v. Collector Of 24-Parganas: Jurisdiction of Collector in Income Tax Recovery Introduction The case of Kashiram Agarwalla v. Collector Of 24-Parganas And Others adjudicated by the...
Calcutta High Court's Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 90 CPC: Preclusion of Sale Challenges and Fraud Considerations

Calcutta High Court's Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 90 CPC: Preclusion of Sale Challenges and Fraud Considerations

Date: May 27, 1955
Calcutta High Court's Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 90 CPC: Preclusion of Sale Challenges and Fraud Considerations Introduction The case of Manmatha Nath Chakravarty And Anr. v. Sachindra Kumar...
National Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India: Clarifying Arbitration Jurisdiction in Insurance Claims

National Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India: Clarifying Arbitration Jurisdiction in Insurance Claims

Date: May 19, 1955
National Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India: Clarifying Arbitration Jurisdiction in Insurance Claims Introduction The case of National Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union...
Strict Adherence to Section 156(3) CPC: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision in Akshoy Kumar Dutta vs. Jogesh Chandra Nandy

Strict Adherence to Section 156(3) CPC: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision in Akshoy Kumar Dutta vs. Jogesh Chandra Nandy

Date: May 14, 1955
Strict Adherence to Section 156(3) CPC: Calcutta High Court's Landmark Decision in Akshoy Kumar Dutta vs. Jogesh Chandra Nandy Introduction The case of Akshoy Kumar Dutta And Ors. Accused vs. Jogesh...
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Permit Allocation: Onkarmal Mistri v. Regional Transport Authority, Darjeeling

Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Permit Allocation: Onkarmal Mistri v. Regional Transport Authority, Darjeeling

Date: Mar 30, 1955
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Permit Allocation: Onkarmal Mistri v. Regional Transport Authority, Darjeeling Introduction The case of Onkarmal Mistri v. Regional Transport Authority, Darjeeling,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert