Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act

Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act

Date: Jul 27, 2002
Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act Introduction The case of Automotive Research Association Of India And Another v. State Of...
Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes

Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes

Date: Jul 27, 2002
Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes Introduction The case of Raja Bahadur Motilal Poona Mills Ltd. And Another Petitioners v. State...
Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 24, 2002
Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board Introduction The case of Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange...
Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment

Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment Introduction In the landmark case of Pascoal Dias v. Assistant Collector Of Customs...
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391 Introduction The case of Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India ([2002]...
Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi

Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi Introduction The case of Yogesh Dattaram Pathak v. Shrikrishna Shriram Joshi is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Broadening Admiralty Powers: Arrest of Ships to Secure Arbitration Awards

Broadening Admiralty Powers: Arrest of Ships to Secure Arbitration Awards

Date: Jul 10, 2002
Broadening Admiralty Powers: Arrest of Ships to Secure Arbitration Awards Introduction The case of Islamic Republic of Iran v. M.V Mehrab And Others adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July 9,...
Affirmation of Bona Fide Requirement and Comparative Hardship in Landlord's Possession Claims: Balwant P. Doshi v. Shantaben Dhirajlal Shah

Affirmation of Bona Fide Requirement and Comparative Hardship in Landlord's Possession Claims: Balwant P. Doshi v. Shantaben Dhirajlal Shah

Date: Jul 5, 2002
Affirmation of Bona Fide Requirement and Comparative Hardship in Landlord's Possession Claims Introduction The case of Balwant P. Doshi v. Shantaben Dhirajlal Shah And Another pertains to a writ...
Determining Validity and Procedure in Land Acquisition Disputes: Insights from Mohandevi v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

Determining Validity and Procedure in Land Acquisition Disputes: Insights from Mohandevi v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

Date: Jul 2, 2002
Determining Validity and Procedure in Land Acquisition Disputes: Insights from Mohandevi v. Special Land Acquisition Officer Introduction The case of Mohandevi v. Special Land Acquisition Officer,...
Emphasizing Functional Integrality in Provident Fund Act Applicability: Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Emphasizing Functional Integrality in Provident Fund Act Applicability: Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Date: Jun 27, 2002
Emphasizing Functional Integrality in Provident Fund Act Applicability: Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Introduction The case of Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. v....
Taxation of Unrealized Profits on Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts: Deutsche Bank A.G. v. Dy. Cit

Taxation of Unrealized Profits on Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts: Deutsche Bank A.G. v. Dy. Cit

Date: Jun 18, 2002
Taxation of Unrealized Profits on Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts: Deutsche Bank A.G. v. Dy. Cit 1. Introduction The case of Deutsche Bank A.G. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax was adjudicated...
Withdrawal of Civil Suit and Possession Restoration: Insights from Mahadkar Agency & Another v. Padmakar Achanna Shetty

Withdrawal of Civil Suit and Possession Restoration: Insights from Mahadkar Agency & Another v. Padmakar Achanna Shetty

Date: Jun 15, 2002
Withdrawal of Civil Suit and Possession Restoration: Insights from Mahadkar Agency & Another v. Padmakar Achanna Shetty Introduction The case of Mahadkar Agency & Another v. Padmakar Achanna Shetty...
Non-Recognition of Damages for Breach of Contract as Assignable Debts: Insights from Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Global Trust Bank Ltd.

Non-Recognition of Damages for Breach of Contract as Assignable Debts: Insights from Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Global Trust Bank Ltd.

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Non-Recognition of Damages for Breach of Contract as Assignable Debts: Insights from Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Global Trust Bank Ltd. Introduction The case of Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v....
Chamber Summons under Order XXI, Rule 41: No Prerequisite of Execution Petition Under Rule 11

Chamber Summons under Order XXI, Rule 41: No Prerequisite of Execution Petition Under Rule 11

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Chamber Summons under Order XXI, Rule 41: No Prerequisite of Execution Petition Under Rule 11 1. Introduction The case of United Phosphorous Ltd. v. A.K. Kanoria, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hede Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.: Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure in Premises Renovation

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hede Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.: Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure in Premises Renovation

Date: Jun 11, 2002
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hede Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.: Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure in Premises Renovation Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa v. Hede Consultancy...
Maintainability of Summary Suits under Order 37 CPC Despite Collateral Security: Suraj Sanghi Finance Ltd. v. Credential Finance Ltd.

Maintainability of Summary Suits under Order 37 CPC Despite Collateral Security: Suraj Sanghi Finance Ltd. v. Credential Finance Ltd.

Date: Jun 4, 2002
Maintainability of Summary Suits under Order 37 CPC Despite Collateral Security: Suraj Sanghi Finance Ltd. v. Credential Finance Ltd. Introduction The case of Suraj Sanghi Finance Ltd. v. Credential...
Diaries Not Recognized as Books of Account under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) - Sheraton Apparels v. Max Corporation

Diaries Not Recognized as Books of Account under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) - Sheraton Apparels v. Max Corporation

Date: May 4, 2002
Diaries Not Recognized as Books of Account under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) Sheraton Apparels v. Max Corporation Court: Bombay High Court Date: May 3, 2002 Introduction The case of Sheraton...
Clarifying Collector's Authority: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Powers under Section 308(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965

Clarifying Collector's Authority: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Powers under Section 308(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965

Date: May 4, 2002
Clarifying Collector's Authority: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Powers under Section 308(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 Introduction In the landmark case of Sanjay Govind Sapkal And...
B.P Plc v. SEBI: Affirming SEBI's Authority to Award Interest under the SEBI Act

B.P Plc v. SEBI: Affirming SEBI's Authority to Award Interest under the SEBI Act

Date: May 3, 2002
B.P Plc v. SEBI: Affirming SEBI's Authority to Award Interest under the SEBI Act Introduction The case of B.P Plc and Another v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Mumbai, adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert