Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Recognition of Qualified Teachers in Municipal Schools: Kondiba v. State Of Maharashtra

Recognition of Qualified Teachers in Municipal Schools: Kondiba v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 13, 2002
Recognition of Qualified Teachers in Municipal Schools: Kondiba v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Kondiba v. State Of Maharashtra adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on September 12,...
Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 to Educational Institutions: Bombay High Court's Landmark Ruling in Head Mistress P. D'Souza v. Nymphia Pereira

Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 to Educational Institutions: Bombay High Court's Landmark Ruling in Head Mistress P. D'Souza v. Nymphia Pereira

Date: Sep 12, 2002
Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 to Educational Institutions: Bombay High Court's Landmark Ruling in Head Mistress P. D'Souza v. Nymphia Pereira Introduction The case of Head...
Clarification on Comparative Hardship in Eviction Suits under the Bombay Rent Act

Clarification on Comparative Hardship in Eviction Suits under the Bombay Rent Act

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Clarification on Comparative Hardship in Eviction Suits under the Bombay Rent Act Introduction The case of Suhasini Atmaram Parab & Others v. B.H Khatu & Others adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Recognition of Subsistence Allowance During Approval Proceedings under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act

Recognition of Subsistence Allowance During Approval Proceedings under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act

Date: Sep 4, 2002
Recognition of Subsistence Allowance During Approval Proceedings under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act Introduction The case of Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Govind...
Reaffirmation of Supervisory Jurisdiction and Workman Status: Sadanand R. Samsi v. Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. & Others

Reaffirmation of Supervisory Jurisdiction and Workman Status: Sadanand R. Samsi v. Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. & Others

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Reaffirmation of Supervisory Jurisdiction and Workman Status: Sadanand R. Samsi v. Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. & Others Introduction The case of Sadanand Ramesh Samsi v. Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. And Others...
Labour Court's Jurisdiction Over Illegal Strike Declaration Despite Strike Withdrawal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Herdillia Chemicals Employees Union v. Herdillia Chemicals

Labour Court's Jurisdiction Over Illegal Strike Declaration Despite Strike Withdrawal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Herdillia Chemicals Employees Union v. Herdillia Chemicals

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Labour Court's Jurisdiction Over Illegal Strike Declaration Despite Strike Withdrawal: A Comprehensive Analysis of Herdillia Chemicals Employees Union v. Herdillia Chemicals Introduction The case of...
Deccan Gymkhana Trust: Clarifying Charitable Status under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act

Deccan Gymkhana Trust: Clarifying Charitable Status under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act

Date: Aug 30, 2002
Deccan Gymkhana Trust: Clarifying Charitable Status under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act Introduction The case of Deccan Gymkhana v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Intersection of Exemption Notifications and Project Import Classification: Insights from Indian Express Newspapers (Bom.) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Intersection of Exemption Notifications and Project Import Classification: Insights from Indian Express Newspapers (Bom.) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Aug 21, 2002
Intersection of Exemption Notifications and Project Import Classification: Insights from Indian Express Newspapers (Bom.) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Indian Express...
Fixation of Rateable Value of Land Under Construction: Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Fixation of Rateable Value of Land Under Construction: Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Date: Aug 20, 2002
Fixation of Rateable Value of Land Under Construction: Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Introduction The case of Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Another...
Rajabhau v. Dinkar: Landmark Interpretation of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Rajabhau v. Dinkar: Landmark Interpretation of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Date: Aug 17, 2002
Rajabhau v. Dinkar: Landmark Interpretation of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure Introduction The case of Rajabhau v. Dinkar adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on August 16, 2002, stands...
Obligation of Landlords to Disclose All Property Holdings When Claiming Bonafide and Reasonable Requirement: Tarachand v. Shroff

Obligation of Landlords to Disclose All Property Holdings When Claiming Bonafide and Reasonable Requirement: Tarachand v. Shroff

Date: Aug 13, 2002
Obligation of Landlords to Disclose All Property Holdings When Claiming Bonafide and Reasonable Requirement: Tarachand Hassaram Shamdasani v. Durgashankar G.Shroff & Ors. Introduction The case of...
Maintainability of Section 96(2) CPC Appeals Despite Rejection of Order 9, Rule 13 Applications

Maintainability of Section 96(2) CPC Appeals Despite Rejection of Order 9, Rule 13 Applications

Date: Aug 10, 2002
Maintainability of Section 96(2) CPC Appeals Despite Rejection of Order 9, Rule 13 Applications Introduction The case of Khurshed Banoo v. Vasant Mallikarjun Manthalkar, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Strengthening Anti-Defection Framework: Comprehensive Analysis of Narsingrao Gurunath Patil & Others v. Arun Gujarathi, Speaker & Others

Strengthening Anti-Defection Framework: Comprehensive Analysis of Narsingrao Gurunath Patil & Others v. Arun Gujarathi, Speaker & Others

Date: Jul 31, 2002
Strengthening Anti-Defection Framework: Comprehensive Analysis of Narsingrao Gurunath Patil & Others v. Arun Gujarathi, Speaker & Others, Bombay High Court Introduction The case of Narsingrao...
Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act

Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act

Date: Jul 27, 2002
Bombay High Court Restricts Suo Motu Revisional Powers under Section 34 of the Urban Land Ceiling Act Introduction The case of Automotive Research Association Of India And Another v. State Of...
Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes

Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes

Date: Jul 27, 2002
Restricting Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Emphasizing Alternate Remedies in Contractual Disputes Introduction The case of Raja Bahadur Motilal Poona Mills Ltd. And Another Petitioners v. State...
Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 24, 2002
Conflicting Appellate Orders in Excise Classification: Insights from Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union Of India is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Safeguarding Natural Justice and Penalty Imposition Criteria under FERA: Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board Introduction The case of Dodsal P. Ltd. v. Foreign Exchange...
Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment

Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Clarifying Burden of Proof under Section 123 and Rights Under Section 102 of the Customs Act: Pascoal Dias Judgment Introduction In the landmark case of Pascoal Dias v. Assistant Collector Of Customs...
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India: Upholding Share Buy-Back Schemes under Section 391 Introduction The case of Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Union of India ([2002]...
Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi

Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Landlord's Bona Fide and Reasonable Requirement in Possession Suits: Pathak v. Joshi Introduction The case of Yogesh Dattaram Pathak v. Shrikrishna Shriram Joshi is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert