Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Assessment of Unexplained Cash Credits under Section 68: Insights from Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Alag Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Assessment of Unexplained Cash Credits under Section 68: Insights from Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Alag Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Assessment of Unexplained Cash Credits under Section 68: Insights from Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. Alag Securities Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner Of Income...
Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Ventura Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-Mumbai City-11

Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Ventura Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-Mumbai City-11

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Clarifying Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Ventura Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-Mumbai City-11 Introduction The case of Ventura Textiles...
Comprehensive Commentary on Jan Swasthya Abhiyan v. State of Maharashtra

Comprehensive Commentary on Jan Swasthya Abhiyan v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Jun 3, 2020
Jan Swasthya Abhiyan v. State of Maharashtra: Enhancing COVID-19 Healthcare Protocols in Maharashtra Introduction The case of Jan Swasthya Abhiyan And Another v. State Of Maharashtra And Others was...
Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale

Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale

Date: May 27, 2020
Enforceability of Maintenance after Divorce: Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale Introduction The case of Sanjay Damodar Kale v. Kalyani Sanjay Kale adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on May...
Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa

Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa

Date: May 20, 2020
Harmonizing Admiralty Jurisdiction with Insolvency Law: Raj Shipping Agencies v. Barge Madhwa Introduction Raj Shipping Agencies, acting as Plaintiff, initiated multiple Admiralty Suits against Barge...
State Policy Decisions in Economic Matters: Upholding Article 14 in Maharashtra's Soft Loan Scheme for Sugar Factories

State Policy Decisions in Economic Matters: Upholding Article 14 in Maharashtra's Soft Loan Scheme for Sugar Factories

Date: May 1, 2020
State Policy Decisions in Economic Matters: Upholding Article 14 in Maharashtra's Soft Loan Scheme for Sugar Factories 1. Introduction The case of Natural Sugar And Allied Industries Limited Through...
Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under SCRA and FEMA: Banyan Tree Growth Capital v. Axiom Cordages

Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under SCRA and FEMA: Banyan Tree Growth Capital v. Axiom Cordages

Date: May 1, 2020
Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under SCRA and FEMA: Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C. v. Axiom Cordages Limited And Others Introduction The case of Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C. v....
Determination of Arbitration Seat and Jurisdiction: Omprakash v. Vijay Dwarkada Varma

Determination of Arbitration Seat and Jurisdiction: Omprakash v. Vijay Dwarkada Varma

Date: Apr 28, 2020
Determination of Arbitration Seat and Jurisdiction: Omprakash And Others v. Vijay Dwarkada Varma Introduction The case of Omprakash And Others v. Vijay Dwarkada Varma was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Bombay High Court Upholds Rule 2(xxiv) of Rules of Legal Education, 2008

Bombay High Court Upholds Rule 2(xxiv) of Rules of Legal Education, 2008

Date: Apr 9, 2020
Bombay High Court Upholds Rule 2(xxiv) of Rules of Legal Education, 2008 Introduction In the landmark case of Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University And A Not v. State Of Maharashtra And...
Enhanced Enforcement of Section 144 Cr.P.C. for COVID-19 Prevention in Maharashtra

Enhanced Enforcement of Section 144 Cr.P.C. for COVID-19 Prevention in Maharashtra

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Enhanced Enforcement of Section 144 Cr.P.C. for COVID-19 Prevention in Maharashtra Introduction The case of C.H. Sharma v. State Of Maharashtra was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 23,...
Nelco Ltd. v. Union of India: Upholding Rule 117 on Transitional Input Tax Credit

Nelco Ltd. v. Union of India: Upholding Rule 117 on Transitional Input Tax Credit

Date: Mar 21, 2020
Nelco Ltd. v. Union of India: Upholding Rule 117 on Transitional Input Tax Credit Introduction The case of Nelco Limited v. Union of India was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 20, 2020....
Interim Injunctions in Commercial IP Disputes: Insights from Narendra Hirawat And Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.

Interim Injunctions in Commercial IP Disputes: Insights from Narendra Hirawat And Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Mar 10, 2020
Interim Injunctions in Commercial IP Disputes: Insights from Narendra Hirawat And Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Introduction Case: Narendra Hirawat And Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment...
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction Over Private Bodies: Chanda Deepak Kochhar v. ICICI Bank Judgment

Limits of Writ Jurisdiction Over Private Bodies: Chanda Deepak Kochhar v. ICICI Bank Judgment

Date: Mar 6, 2020
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction Over Private Bodies: Chanda Deepak Kochhar v. ICICI Bank Judgment Introduction The case of Chanda Deepak Kochhar v. ICICI Bank Limited And Another was adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Disqualification Criteria under Section 16(1D): High Court's Ruling in Abhishek Vinod Patil v. Divisional Commissioner, Nashik

Clarifying Disqualification Criteria under Section 16(1D): High Court's Ruling in Abhishek Vinod Patil v. Divisional Commissioner, Nashik

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Clarifying Disqualification Criteria under Section 16(1D): High Court's Ruling in Abhishek Vinod Patil v. Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Introduction The case of Abhishek Vinod Patil v. Divisional...
Enhancement of 'Patent Illegality' Under Section 34: Union of India v Recon

Enhancement of 'Patent Illegality' Under Section 34: Union of India v Recon

Date: Feb 14, 2020
Enhancement of 'Patent Illegality' Under Section 34: Union of India v Recon Introduction The case of Union of India, Through The Executive Engineer (C) v. Recon adjudicated in the Bombay High Court...
Reaffirmation of Presumption of Innocence: Anthony Fernandes v. Police Inspector And Another

Reaffirmation of Presumption of Innocence: Anthony Fernandes v. Police Inspector And Another

Date: Feb 1, 2020
Reaffirmation of Presumption of Innocence: Anthony Fernandes v. Police Inspector And Another Introduction The case of Anthony Fernandes v. Police Inspector And Another adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Discharging the Assessee's Onus Without Proving the Source of the Source

Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Discharging the Assessee's Onus Without Proving the Source of the Source

Date: Jan 30, 2020
Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Discharging the Assessee's Onus Without Proving the Source of the Source Introduction The case of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Land Acquisition Reference Proceedings

Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Land Acquisition Reference Proceedings

Date: Jan 18, 2020
Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Land Acquisition Reference Proceedings Introduction The case of Walmik Trimbak Tupe v. The State of Maharashtra and Another was adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Provisional Attachment Under Section 83 of the CGST Act: Insights from the Kaish Impex Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India Judgment

Clarifying Provisional Attachment Under Section 83 of the CGST Act: Insights from the Kaish Impex Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India Judgment

Date: Jan 18, 2020
Clarifying Provisional Attachment Under Section 83 of the CGST Act: Insights from the Kaish Impex Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India Judgment Introduction The judicial landscape surrounding the Central Goods...
Partial Arbitration in Multi-Transaction Disputes: Insights from Taru Meghani v. Shree Tirupati Greenfield

Partial Arbitration in Multi-Transaction Disputes: Insights from Taru Meghani v. Shree Tirupati Greenfield

Date: Jan 11, 2020
Partial Arbitration in Multi-Transaction Disputes: Insights from Taru Meghani v. Shree Tirupati Greenfield Introduction The case of Taru Meghani v. Shree Tirupati Greenfield adjudicated by the Bombay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert