Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India

Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India

Date: Sep 29, 2006
Valuation of Physicians Free Samples under Rule 4: Insights from Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association v. Union of India Introduction In the landmark case of Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association...
Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra

Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Non-Retrospective Application of Penal Amendments: Adamji Lookmanji & Co. v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Adamji Lookmanji & Co. & Ors. v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. adjudicated by...
Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases

Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Judgment Analysis: Manohar Dhonde v. State of Maharashtra - Scrutiny of PIL and Upholding Natural Justice in Sexual Harassment Cases Introduction The case of Manohar Dhonde (Prof.) & Ors. v. State Of...
Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses

Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra: Upholding Separate Trials and Sequential Sentencing in Section 138 NI Act Offenses Introduction Rajendra v. State Of Maharashtra is a significant judgment delivered...
Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Deshmukh

Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Deshmukh

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Strengthening Presumptions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Purushottam v. Manohar K. Deshmukh Introduction The case of Purushottam v. Manohar K. Deshmukh, adjudicated by the...
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj S. Deshpande: Reinforcing Individual Assessment in Unfair Labour Practice Cases under MRTU Act Introduction In the landmark case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd v. Manoj...
Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others

Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others

Date: Sep 19, 2006
Reaffirmation of Principles in Disciplinary Proceedings: Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others Introduction The case of Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani v. Union Of India And Others...
Deemed Confirmation of Permanent Employee under M.E.P.S Act: President v. Sunita Bansidhar Patole

Deemed Confirmation of Permanent Employee under M.E.P.S Act: President v. Sunita Bansidhar Patole

Date: Sep 16, 2006
Deemed Confirmation of Permanent Employee under M.E.P.S Act: President v. Sunita Bansidhar Patole Introduction The case of President v. Sunita Bansidhar Patole was adjudicated in the Bombay High...
Liability for Gratuity Payments Post-Dissolution of Partnership: Ramchand Daulatram Chhabria v. Deputy Commissioner Of Labour

Liability for Gratuity Payments Post-Dissolution of Partnership: Ramchand Daulatram Chhabria v. Deputy Commissioner Of Labour

Date: Sep 14, 2006
Liability for Gratuity Payments Post-Dissolution of Partnership: Ramchand Daulatram Chhabria And Others v. Deputy Commissioner Of Labour And Appellate Authority And Others Introduction The case of...
Section 148 Reopening of Assessments Requires Concrete Evidence – Bombay High Court in Vijaykumar M. Hirakhanwala v. Income Tax Officer

Section 148 Reopening of Assessments Requires Concrete Evidence – Bombay High Court in Vijaykumar M. Hirakhanwala v. Income Tax Officer

Date: Sep 6, 2006
Section 148 Reopening of Assessments Requires Concrete Evidence – Bombay High Court in Vijaykumar M. Hirakhanwala v. Income Tax Officer Introduction The case of Vijaykumar M. Hirakhanwala (Huf) v....
Strict Adherence to MCOCA Act Procedures in Admissibility of Confessions: Analysis of Mohamad Iqbal Farooq Sheikh & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra

Strict Adherence to MCOCA Act Procedures in Admissibility of Confessions: Analysis of Mohamad Iqbal Farooq Sheikh & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 6, 2006
Strict Adherence to MCOCA Act Procedures in Admissibility of Confessions: Analysis of Mohamad Iqbal Farooq Sheikh & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Mohamad Iqbal Farooq Sheikh &...
Assessment Reopening Limits under Section 147: Insights from Western Outdoor Interactive P. Ltd. v. A.K Phute

Assessment Reopening Limits under Section 147: Insights from Western Outdoor Interactive P. Ltd. v. A.K Phute

Date: Sep 6, 2006
Assessment Reopening Limits under Section 147: Insights from Western Outdoor Interactive P. Ltd. v. A.K Phute Introduction The case of Western Outdoor Interactive P. Ltd. v. A.K Phute, Income-Tax...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Cheque Dishonour Cases: Insights from Ahuja Nandkishore Dongre v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Cheque Dishonour Cases: Insights from Ahuja Nandkishore Dongre v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

Date: Sep 5, 2006
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Cheque Dishonour Cases: Insights from Ahuja Nandkishore Dongre v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. Introduction The case of Ahuja Nandkishore Dongre v. State Of Maharashtra &...
Jurisdictional Constraints on Interim Orders in Testamentary Suits: Rupali Mehta v. Tina Narinder Sain Mehta

Jurisdictional Constraints on Interim Orders in Testamentary Suits: Rupali Mehta v. Tina Narinder Sain Mehta

Date: Aug 30, 2006
Jurisdictional Constraints on Interim Orders in Testamentary Suits: Rupali Mehta v. Tina Narinder Sain Mehta Introduction The case of Rupali Mehta v. Tina Narinder Sain Mehta adjudicated by the...
Reclassification of Assault Charges in Premachand S. Bansode & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra

Reclassification of Assault Charges in Premachand S. Bansode & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 24, 2006
Reclassification of Assault Charges in Premachand S. Bansode & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Premachand S. Bansode & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra adjudicated by the Bombay...
Defining the Regulatory Boundaries of Admission Committees: A Landmark Judgement in Association of Unaided Engineering Colleges v. State of Maharashtra

Defining the Regulatory Boundaries of Admission Committees: A Landmark Judgement in Association of Unaided Engineering Colleges v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Jul 27, 2006
Defining the Regulatory Boundaries of Admission Committees: A Landmark Judgement in Association of Unaided Engineering Colleges v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1. Introduction The case of Association...
High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Offence Proceedings: Kiran T. Ingale v. Smt. Anupama P. Gaikwad & Ors.

High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Offence Proceedings: Kiran T. Ingale v. Smt. Anupama P. Gaikwad & Ors.

Date: Jul 26, 2006
High Court Affirms Inherent Power to Quash Matrimonial Offence Proceedings: Kiran T. Ingale v. Smt. Anupama P. Gaikwad & Ors. Introduction The case of Kiran Tulshiram Ingale v. Smt. Anupama P....
Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik: Re-defining Liability Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik: Re-defining Liability Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Date: Jul 22, 2006
Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik: Re-defining Liability Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act Introduction The case of Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik...
Judicial Directions on Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Peacock Industries Ltd. v. Budhrani Finance Ltd.

Judicial Directions on Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Peacock Industries Ltd. v. Budhrani Finance Ltd.

Date: Jul 15, 2006
Judicial Directions on Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Peacock Industries Ltd. v. Budhrani Finance Ltd. Introduction The case of Peacock Industries Ltd., Udaipur And Others v. Budhrani...
Establishing Market Price Standards and Compensation Enhancements in Land Acquisition: State Of Maharashtra v. Baliram Girdhar Patil

Establishing Market Price Standards and Compensation Enhancements in Land Acquisition: State Of Maharashtra v. Baliram Girdhar Patil

Date: Jul 14, 2006
Establishing Market Price Standards and Compensation Enhancements in Land Acquisition: State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Baliram Girdhar Patil Introduction The case of State Of Maharashtra And...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert