Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

General Insurance Corporation vs. DCD Income Tax: Bombay High Court Reinforces Requirement of Tangible Material to Reopen Assessments under Section 148

General Insurance Corporation vs. DCD Income Tax: Bombay High Court Reinforces Requirement of Tangible Material to Reopen Assessments under Section 148

Date: Dec 2, 2011
General Insurance Corporation vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax: Bombay High Court Reinforces Requirement of Tangible Material to Reopen Assessments under Section 148 Introduction The case of...
Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Income Tax Assessments: Ingram Micro India Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Income Tax Assessments: Ingram Micro India Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Dec 1, 2011
Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Income Tax Assessments: Ingram Micro India Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ingram Micro India Ltd. (Formerly Known As...
Sanket Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Others: Legal Commentary on Food Adulteration and Tobacco Regulation

Sanket Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Others: Legal Commentary on Food Adulteration and Tobacco Regulation

Date: Nov 24, 2011
Sanket Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Others: Legal Commentary on Food Adulteration and Tobacco Regulation Introduction The case of Sanket Foods Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Others was...
Disclosure of Material Facts Prevents Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years: Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner

Disclosure of Material Facts Prevents Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years: Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner

Date: Nov 23, 2011
Disclosure of Material Facts Prevents Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years: Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner Introduction Kimplas Trenton Fittings Ltd. B-29, MIDC, Ambad,...
Judicial Interpretation of Section 80IB: Employment Criteria and Manufacturing Premises - Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jyoti Plastic Works Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Interpretation of Section 80IB: Employment Criteria and Manufacturing Premises - Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jyoti Plastic Works Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 16, 2011
Judicial Interpretation of Section 80IB: Employment Criteria and Manufacturing Premises Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Jyoti Plastic Works Private Limited adjudicated...
Uniform Legislation Over Scrutiny Committees: Insights from Ajaykumar Yadaorao Nikhar v. State of Maharashtra

Uniform Legislation Over Scrutiny Committees: Insights from Ajaykumar Yadaorao Nikhar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Nov 12, 2011
Uniform Legislation Over Scrutiny Committees: Insights from Ajaykumar Yadaorao Nikhar v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Ajaykumar Yadaorao Nikhar v. State of Maharashtra, adjudicated...
Strict Requirements for Reopening Tax Assessments Beyond Four Years: Icici Bank Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Strict Requirements for Reopening Tax Assessments Beyond Four Years: Icici Bank Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Nov 10, 2011
Strict Requirements for Reopening Tax Assessments Beyond Four Years: Icici Bank Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Icici Bank Ltd. Petitioner v. Dy. Commissioner Of...
Full and True Disclosure under Section 147: Insights from Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Full and True Disclosure under Section 147: Insights from Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Nov 9, 2011
Full and True Disclosure under Section 147: Insights from Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Assistant...
Classification of Transaction Charges as Fees for Technical Services under Section 194J: Bombay High Court Sets New Precedent

Classification of Transaction Charges as Fees for Technical Services under Section 194J: Bombay High Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Oct 22, 2011
Classification of Transaction Charges as Fees for Technical Services under Section 194J: Bombay High Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The judgment in the case of Income Tax-4 v. Kotak Securities...
Exclusion of Letters Patent Appeals in Arbitration Proceedings: Jet Airways v. Subrata Roy Sahara

Exclusion of Letters Patent Appeals in Arbitration Proceedings: Jet Airways v. Subrata Roy Sahara

Date: Oct 18, 2011
Exclusion of Letters Patent Appeals in Arbitration Proceedings: Jet Airways (India) Limited v. Subrata Roy Sahara Introduction The case of Jet Airways (India) Limited v. Subrata Roy Sahara...
Determining Beneficial Ownership in Maritime Arrests: Insights from Great Pacific Navigation v. M.V Tongli Yantai

Determining Beneficial Ownership in Maritime Arrests: Insights from Great Pacific Navigation v. M.V Tongli Yantai

Date: Oct 15, 2011
Determining Beneficial Ownership in Maritime Arrests: Insights from Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Ltd. v. M.V Tongli Yantai Introduction The case of Great Pacific Navigation...
Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable Where Remedies Under Sub-rule 14 Are Available: Insights from Adarsh Mahila Nagri Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. State Of Maharashtra

Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable Where Remedies Under Sub-rule 14 Are Available: Insights from Adarsh Mahila Nagri Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Oct 14, 2011
Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable Where Remedies Under Sub-rule 14 Are Available: Insights from Adarsh Mahila Nagri Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Anr. v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors. (2011)...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjula J. Shah: Indexed Cost of Acquisition Determination

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjula J. Shah: Indexed Cost of Acquisition Determination

Date: Oct 12, 2011
Indexed Cost of Acquisition Determination in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjula J. Shah Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Manjula J. Shah adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Bombay High Court Upholds MEA's 2011 Haj Policy While Allocating Additional Quotas

Bombay High Court Upholds MEA's 2011 Haj Policy While Allocating Additional Quotas

Date: Oct 6, 2011
Bombay High Court Upholds MEA's 2011 Haj Policy While Allocating Additional Quotas Introduction The case of Rafique Shaikh Bhikan Petitioner v. The Government Of India & Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Change of Opinion Not Permitted for Reopening Assessments under Section 148: Direct Information Pvt Ltd v. ITO

Change of Opinion Not Permitted for Reopening Assessments under Section 148: Direct Information Pvt Ltd v. ITO

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Change of Opinion Not Permitted for Reopening Assessments under Section 148: Direct Information Private Limited v. Income-Tax Officer And Others Introduction The case of Direct Information Private...
Commissioner’s Authority to Overrule Enquiry Reports: Insights from Delta Logistics v. Union Of India

Commissioner’s Authority to Overrule Enquiry Reports: Insights from Delta Logistics v. Union Of India

Date: Sep 15, 2011
Commissioner’s Authority to Overrule Enquiry Reports: Insights from Delta Logistics v. Union Of India 1. Introduction Delta Logistics v. Union Of India & Ors. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Conditional Enforcement of Bank Guarantees: Western Coalfields Limited v. Rajesh

Conditional Enforcement of Bank Guarantees: Western Coalfields Limited v. Rajesh

Date: Sep 7, 2011
Conditional Enforcement of Bank Guarantees: Western Coalfields Limited v. Rajesh Introduction The case of Western Coalfields Limited v. Rajesh adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on September 6,...
Expedited Procedures for Section 14 SARFAESI Applications: Bombay High Court's Landmark Guidelines

Expedited Procedures for Section 14 SARFAESI Applications: Bombay High Court's Landmark Guidelines

Date: Aug 21, 2011
Expedited Procedures for Section 14 SARFAESI Applications: Bombay High Court's Landmark Guidelines Introduction The judgment in International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited v. Union Of...
Property Tax Assessment Criteria Under Basawesar v. Gram Panchayat: Capital Value vs. Annual Letting Value

Property Tax Assessment Criteria Under Basawesar v. Gram Panchayat: Capital Value vs. Annual Letting Value

Date: Aug 18, 2011
Property Tax Assessment Criteria Under Basawesar v. Gram Panchayat: Capital Value vs. Annual Letting Value Introduction The case of Basawesar v. Gram Panchayat, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Substance Over Form and Administrative Fairness in PPP Tendering: Shalby Ltd. v. State of Goa

Substance Over Form and Administrative Fairness in PPP Tendering: Shalby Ltd. v. State of Goa

Date: Aug 13, 2011
Substance Over Form and Administrative Fairness in PPP Tendering: Shalby Ltd. v. State of Goa Introduction The case of Shalby Limited and Another v. State of Goa and Others adjudicated by the Bombay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert