Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Mazda Construction Company v. Sultanabad Darshan Chs Ltd.: Clarifying Limits on Deemed Conveyance Issuance Under MOFA

Mazda Construction Company v. Sultanabad Darshan Chs Ltd.: Clarifying Limits on Deemed Conveyance Issuance Under MOFA

Date: Sep 1, 2012
Mazda Construction Company v. Sultanabad Darshan Chs Ltd.: Clarifying Limits on Deemed Conveyance Issuance Under MOFA Introduction The case of Mazda Construction Company v. Sultanabad Darshan Chs...
Bombay High Court Affirms Suspension of Genetic Clinic for Record Deficiencies Under PCPNDT Act

Bombay High Court Affirms Suspension of Genetic Clinic for Record Deficiencies Under PCPNDT Act

Date: Aug 17, 2012
Bombay High Court Affirms Suspension of Genetic Clinic for Record Deficiencies Under PCPNDT Act Introduction In the case of Age: 38 Years v. State Of Maharashtra, decided by the Bombay High Court on...
Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 271(1)(c): Bombay High Court Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii vs. M/S. Aditya Birla Nova Limited

Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 271(1)(c): Bombay High Court Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii vs. M/S. Aditya Birla Nova Limited

Date: Aug 15, 2012
Clarifying Penalty Provisions under Section 271(1)(c): Bombay High Court Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii vs. M/S. Aditya Birla Nova Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income...
Recognizing Business Losses under Section 28 When Bad Debts under Section 36(2) are Disallowed – Harshad J. Choksi v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Recognizing Business Losses under Section 28 When Bad Debts under Section 36(2) are Disallowed – Harshad J. Choksi v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Aug 15, 2012
Recognizing Business Losses under Section 28 When Bad Debts under Section 36(2) are Disallowed – Harshad J. Choksi v. Commissioner of Income-Tax 1. Introduction The case of Harshad J. Choksi v....
Reassessment of Trademark Registration Validity in Passing Off and Infringement Injunctions in Indian Jurisprudence

Reassessment of Trademark Registration Validity in Passing Off and Infringement Injunctions in Indian Jurisprudence

Date: Aug 14, 2012
Reassessment of Trademark Registration Validity in Passing Off and Infringement Injunctions in Indian Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Lupin Limited v. Johnson & Johnson before the Bombay High...
Strangers to a Suit Cannot Challenge Consent Decree under Order 23 Rule 3-A CPC: Bombay High Court Precedent

Strangers to a Suit Cannot Challenge Consent Decree under Order 23 Rule 3-A CPC: Bombay High Court Precedent

Date: Aug 8, 2012
Strangers to a Suit Cannot Challenge Consent Decree under Order 23 Rule 3-A CPC: Bombay High Court Precedent Introduction The case of Khalil Hajibholumiya Salar v. Parveen, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Taxation of Slot Chartering Income under DTAA Article 9: Insights from Income Tax v. Balaji Shipping UK Ltd.

Taxation of Slot Chartering Income under DTAA Article 9: Insights from Income Tax v. Balaji Shipping UK Ltd.

Date: Aug 7, 2012
Taxation of Slot Chartering Income under DTAA Article 9: Insights from Income Tax v. Balaji Shipping UK Ltd. Introduction The case of Income Tax v. Balaji Shipping UK Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay...
Impact of Delayed Witness Statements on Criminal Convictions: Commentary on Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane v. The State of Maharashtra

Impact of Delayed Witness Statements on Criminal Convictions: Commentary on Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane v. The State of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 7, 2012
Impact of Delayed Witness Statements on Criminal Convictions: Commentary on Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane (Wrongly) v. The State of Maharashtra 1. Introduction The case of Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane (Wrongly)...
Authority of Vice Chancellor to Withdraw Teacher Appointments Upon Criminal Conviction Under Maharashtra Universities Act

Authority of Vice Chancellor to Withdraw Teacher Appointments Upon Criminal Conviction Under Maharashtra Universities Act

Date: Aug 4, 2012
Authority of Vice Chancellor to Withdraw Teacher Appointments Upon Criminal Conviction Under Maharashtra Universities Act Introduction The case of Sunil Gayaprasad Mishra v. Rashtra Sant Tukdoji...
Civil Court Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Co-operative Court in Redevelopment Disputes

Civil Court Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Co-operative Court in Redevelopment Disputes

Date: Aug 2, 2012
Civil Court Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Co-operative Court in Redevelopment Disputes Introduction The case of Mohinder Kaur Kochar v. Mayfair Housing Pvt. Ltd. And Others, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Extension of Investment Period under Section 54EC when Specified Bonds are Unavailable: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ms. Cello Plast

Extension of Investment Period under Section 54EC when Specified Bonds are Unavailable: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ms. Cello Plast

Date: Jul 28, 2012
Extension of Investment Period under Section 54EC when Specified Bonds are Unavailable: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ms. Cello Plast Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Sheth Developers Judgment: Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) from Undisclosed Income

Sheth Developers Judgment: Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) from Undisclosed Income

Date: Jul 28, 2012
Sheth Developers Judgment: Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) from Undisclosed Income Introduction The case of Income Tax v. Sheth Developers (P) Ltd. was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July...
Reassessing Jurisdiction in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Icici Home Finance Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax

Reassessing Jurisdiction in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Icici Home Finance Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax

Date: Jul 21, 2012
Reassessing Jurisdiction in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Icici Home Finance Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax Introduction The case of Icici Home Finance Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax adjudicated by the...
Commissioner's Discretion in Customs House Agents Licensing Under Regulation 22: Delta Logistics v. Union Of India

Commissioner's Discretion in Customs House Agents Licensing Under Regulation 22: Delta Logistics v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 20, 2012
Commissioner's Discretion in Customs House Agents Licensing Under Regulation 22: Delta Logistics v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Delta Logistics, Mumbai v. Union Of India And Another...
Ferani Hotels Pvt Ltd v. Nusli Neville Wadia: Landmark Judgment on Section 9-A Jurisdictional Issues

Ferani Hotels Pvt Ltd v. Nusli Neville Wadia: Landmark Judgment on Section 9-A Jurisdictional Issues

Date: Jul 20, 2012
Ferani Hotels Pvt Ltd v. Nusli Neville Wadia: Landmark Judgment on Section 9-A Jurisdictional Issues Introduction The case of Ferani Hotels Private Limited v. Nusli Neville Wadia & Others,...
Icici Bank Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Requirement of Tangible Material for Reopening Assessments under Section 148

Icici Bank Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Requirement of Tangible Material for Reopening Assessments under Section 148

Date: Jul 10, 2012
Icici Bank Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Requirement of Tangible Material for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 Introduction The case of Income Tax v. ICICI Bank Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Accrual of Interest and DTAA Classification of Securities Gains: Bombay High Court in Director of Income Tax v. Credit Suisse Case

Clarifying Accrual of Interest and DTAA Classification of Securities Gains: Bombay High Court in Director of Income Tax v. Credit Suisse Case

Date: Jul 10, 2012
Clarifying Accrual of Interest and DTAA Classification of Securities Gains: Bombay High Court in Director of Income Tax v. Credit Suisse Case Introduction The case of Director Of Income Tax...
Summary Eviction under Section 95A: Radhika George v. MHADA Establishes Precedent for Redevelopment

Summary Eviction under Section 95A: Radhika George v. MHADA Establishes Precedent for Redevelopment

Date: Jul 5, 2012
Summary Eviction under Section 95A: Radhika George v. MHADA Establishes Precedent for Redevelopment Introduction The case of Radhika George And Others v. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development...
Limits on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Parveen P. Bharucha v. Income Tax

Limits on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Parveen P. Bharucha v. Income Tax

Date: Jun 28, 2012
Limits on Reopening Assessments under Section 147: Insights from Parveen P. Bharucha v. Income Tax Introduction The case of Parveen P. Bharucha v. Income Tax adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Clarification on Reduced Penalty under Section 11AC: Central Excise v. Castrol India Ltd.

Clarification on Reduced Penalty under Section 11AC: Central Excise v. Castrol India Ltd.

Date: Jun 26, 2012
Clarification on Reduced Penalty under Section 11AC: Central Excise v. Castrol India Ltd. Introduction The case of Central Excise v. Castrol India Ltd., adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on June...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert