Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Government of Bombay v. Esufali Salebhai: Expanding the Scope of the Land Acquisition Act

Government of Bombay v. Esufali Salebhai: Expanding the Scope of the Land Acquisition Act

Date: Nov 2, 1909
Government of Bombay v. Esufali Salebhai: Expanding the Scope of the Land Acquisition Act Introduction The case of The Government Of Bombay v. Esufali Salebhai adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Purushottam Hargovandas v. Rajbai: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings Amid Estate Management

Purushottam Hargovandas v. Rajbai: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings Amid Estate Management

Date: Sep 2, 1909
Purushottam Hargovandas v. Rajbai: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings Amid Estate Management Introduction Purushottam Hargovandas v. Rajbai is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on...
Kisandas Rupchand v. Rachappa Vithoba Shilwant: Principles Governing Amendment of Pleadings

Kisandas Rupchand v. Rachappa Vithoba Shilwant: Principles Governing Amendment of Pleadings

Date: Jul 3, 1909
Kisandas Rupchand v. Rachappa Vithoba Shilwant: Principles Governing Amendment of Pleadings Introduction Kisandas Rupchand filed a suit in the Bombay High Court on March 28, 1905, seeking dissolution...
Res Judicata and Specific Performance in Ahmedbhoy v. Sir Dinshaw M. Petit: A Comprehensive Commentary

Res Judicata and Specific Performance in Ahmedbhoy v. Sir Dinshaw M. Petit: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jun 15, 1909
Res Judicata and Specific Performance in Ahmedbhoy v. Sir Dinshaw M. Petit: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of Ahmedbhoy Habibbhoy v. Sir Dinshaw M. Petit And Others,...
Liability of Minor Coparceners in Joint Hindu Family Firms: Insights from Raghunathji Tarachand A Firm v. Bank Of Bombay

Liability of Minor Coparceners in Joint Hindu Family Firms: Insights from Raghunathji Tarachand A Firm v. Bank Of Bombay

Date: Jan 23, 1909
Liability of Minor Coparceners in Joint Hindu Family Firms: Insights from Raghunathji Tarachand A Firm v. Bank Of Bombay Introduction The case of Raghunathji Tarachand A Firm v. Bank Of Bombay...
Land Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Insights from Government of Bombay v. Cama (1908)

Land Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Insights from Government of Bombay v. Cama (1908)

Date: Aug 21, 1908
Land Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Insights from Government of Bombay v. Merwanji Muncherji Cama (1908) Introduction The case of Government of Bombay v. Merwanji Muncherji Cama, decided...
Principles of Land Valuation in Acquisition: Government of Bombay v. Karim Tar Mahomed (1908)

Principles of Land Valuation in Acquisition: Government of Bombay v. Karim Tar Mahomed (1908)

Date: Jun 19, 1908
Principles of Land Valuation in Acquisition: Government of Bombay v. Karim Tar Mahomed (1908) Introduction Government of Bombay v. Karim Tar Mahomed is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay...
Distinguishing Hindu Joint Family Property from English Joint Property: Karsandas Dharamsey v. Gangabai (1908)

Distinguishing Hindu Joint Family Property from English Joint Property: Karsandas Dharamsey v. Gangabai (1908)

Date: Jan 24, 1908
Distinguishing Hindu Joint Family Property from English Joint Property: Karsandas Dharamsey v. Gangabai (1908) Introduction Karsandas Dharamsey v. Gangabai is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Preservation of Widow's Inheritance Rights in Gangu v. Chandrabhagabai

Preservation of Widow's Inheritance Rights in Gangu v. Chandrabhagabai

Date: Dec 12, 1907
Preservation of Widow's Inheritance Rights in Gangu v. Chandrabhagabai Introduction The case of Gangu v. Chandrabhagabai, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on December 11, 1907, addresses pivotal...
Recognition of Parsi Religious Trusts as Charitable under Indian Law: Commentary on Jamshedji Cursetjee Tarachand v. Soonabai

Recognition of Parsi Religious Trusts as Charitable under Indian Law: Commentary on Jamshedji Cursetjee Tarachand v. Soonabai

Date: Dec 3, 1907
Recognition of Parsi Religious Trusts as Charitable under Indian Law: Commentary on Jamshedji Cursetjee Tarachand v. Soonabai Introduction The case of Jamshedji Cursetjee Tarachand v. Soonabai,...
Transfer of Widow's Succession Rights Validated with Consent of Reversionary Heirs: Insights from Bajrangi Singh v. Manokarnika Bakhsh Singh

Transfer of Widow's Succession Rights Validated with Consent of Reversionary Heirs: Insights from Bajrangi Singh v. Manokarnika Bakhsh Singh

Date: Nov 1, 1907
Transfer of Widow's Succession Rights Validated with Consent of Reversionary Heirs: Insights from Bajrangi Singh v. Manokarnika Bakhsh Singh 1. Introduction The case of Bajrangi Singh v. Manokarnika...
Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence Review: Insights from Emperor v. Narayen Raghunath Patki

Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence Review: Insights from Emperor v. Narayen Raghunath Patki

Date: Jun 26, 1907
Admissibility of Confessions and Evidence Review: Insights from Emperor v. Narayen Raghunath Patki Introduction Emperor v. Narayen Raghunath Patki is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Statutory Tribunals in Election Validity: Insights from Bhaishankar Nanabhai v. Municipal Corporation Of Bombay

Exclusive Jurisdiction of Statutory Tribunals in Election Validity: Insights from Bhaishankar Nanabhai v. Municipal Corporation Of Bombay

Date: Apr 19, 1907
Exclusive Jurisdiction of Statutory Tribunals in Election Validity: Insights from Bhaishankar Nanabhai v. Municipal Corporation Of Bombay Introduction The case of Bhaishankar Nanabhai v. Municipal...
Sarabai v. Rabiabai: Affirming the Finality of Irrevocable Divorce Under Mahomedan Law

Sarabai v. Rabiabai: Affirming the Finality of Irrevocable Divorce Under Mahomedan Law

Date: Dec 10, 1905
Sarabai v. Rabiabai: Affirming the Finality of Irrevocable Divorce Under Mahomedan Law Introduction In the landmark case of Sarabai v. Rabiabai (Bombay High Court, December 9, 1905), the court was...
Establishing Standards for Perjury: Insights from Emperor v. Bankatram Lachiram (1904)

Establishing Standards for Perjury: Insights from Emperor v. Bankatram Lachiram (1904)

Date: Mar 24, 1904
Establishing Standards for Perjury: Insights from Emperor v. Bankatram Lachiram (1904) Introduction The case of Emperor v. Bankatram Lachiram adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 23, 1904,...
Limits on Administrative Authority and Adverse Possession in Thakore Fatesingji Dipsangji v. Bamanji Ardeshir Dalal

Limits on Administrative Authority and Adverse Possession in Thakore Fatesingji Dipsangji v. Bamanji Ardeshir Dalal

Date: Feb 27, 1903
Limits on Administrative Authority and Adverse Possession in Thakore Fatesingji Dipsangji v. Bamanji Ardeshir Dalal Introduction Thakore Fatesingji Dipsangji v. Bamanji Ardeshir Dalal is a landmark...
Discretionary Authority in Licensing: Insights from Gell v. Taja Noora

Discretionary Authority in Licensing: Insights from Gell v. Taja Noora

Date: Feb 3, 1903
Discretionary Authority in Licensing: Insights from Gell v. Taja Noora Introduction The case of Gell v. Taja Noora adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on February 2, 1903, addresses critical issues...
Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Tarubai v. Venkatrao

Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Tarubai v. Venkatrao

Date: Sep 13, 1902
Adverse Possession and Equity of Redemption: Insights from Tarubai And Ors. v. Venkatrao And Ors. Introduction The case of Tarubai And Ors. v. Venkatrao And Ors., adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Establishing Indefeasible Title Through Trustee Conveyance: Insights from De Silva v. De Silva And Devkaran Nanji

Establishing Indefeasible Title Through Trustee Conveyance: Insights from De Silva v. De Silva And Devkaran Nanji

Date: Sep 13, 1902
Establishing Indefeasible Title Through Trustee Conveyance: Insights from De Silva v. De Silva And Devkaran Nanji Introduction De Silva v. De Silva And Devkaran Nanji is a landmark judgment delivered...
Establishment of Ancestral Property Rights Among Khojas in Bombay High Court

Establishment of Ancestral Property Rights Among Khojas in Bombay High Court

Date: Jun 22, 1889
Establishment of Ancestral Property Rights Among Khojas in Bombay High Court Introduction The case of Ahmedbhoy Hubibbhoy v. Cassumbhoy Ahmedbhoy adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on June 21,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert