Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Interpretation of 'Suit Instituted' under Indian Limitation Act, 1908 in the Context of Corporate Liquidation

Interpretation of 'Suit Instituted' under Indian Limitation Act, 1908 in the Context of Corporate Liquidation

Date: Dec 17, 1932
Interpretation of 'Suit Instituted' under Indian Limitation Act, 1908 in the Context of Corporate Liquidation Introduction The case of Hansraj Gupta v. The Official Liquidators, Dehra-Dun Elec....
Sabava Yellappa v. Yamanappa Sabu: Void Transfers for Unlawful Considerations in Property Conveyance

Sabava Yellappa v. Yamanappa Sabu: Void Transfers for Unlawful Considerations in Property Conveyance

Date: Dec 1, 1932
Sabava Yellappa v. Yamanappa Sabu: Void Transfers for Unlawful Considerations in Property Conveyance Introduction Sabava Yellappa v. Yamanappa Sabu is a landmark case decided by the Bombay High Court...
Sundrabai Sitaram v. Manohar Dhondu: Establishing the Voidness of Benami Transactions under Statutory Prohibitions

Sundrabai Sitaram v. Manohar Dhondu: Establishing the Voidness of Benami Transactions under Statutory Prohibitions

Date: Nov 22, 1932
Sundrabai Sitaram v. Manohar Dhondu: Establishing the Voidness of Benami Transactions under Statutory Prohibitions Introduction The case of Sundrabai Sitaram and Another v. Manohar Dhondu was...
Establishing Jurisdiction Based on Place of Performance: Champaklal Mohanlal v. Nector Tea Company

Establishing Jurisdiction Based on Place of Performance: Champaklal Mohanlal v. Nector Tea Company

Date: Oct 14, 1932
Establishing Jurisdiction Based on Place of Performance: Champaklal Mohanlal v. Nector Tea Company Introduction Champaklal Mohanlal v. Nector Tea Company is a landmark case decided by the Bombay High...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Probate Revocation: Insights from Narbheram Jivram Purohit v. Jevallabh Harjivan

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Probate Revocation: Insights from Narbheram Jivram Purohit v. Jevallabh Harjivan

Date: Sep 24, 1932
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Probate Revocation: Insights from Narbheram Jivram Purohit v. Jevallabh Harjivan Introduction The case of Narbheram Jivram Purohit v. Jevallabh Harjivan adjudicated by...
No Appeal from Consent Decree in Compromise Agreements

No Appeal from Consent Decree in Compromise Agreements

Date: Sep 21, 1932
No Appeal from Consent Decree in Compromise Agreements Introduction The case Onkar Bhagwan v. Gamna Lakhaji And Co., adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on September 20, 1932, addresses crucial...
Prioritization of Mortgage Claims in Insolvency: Official Assignee of Bombay v. Chimniram Motilal

Prioritization of Mortgage Claims in Insolvency: Official Assignee of Bombay v. Chimniram Motilal

Date: Sep 1, 1932
Prioritization of Mortgage Claims in Insolvency: Official Assignee of Bombay v. Chimniram Motilal Introduction The case of Official Assignee of Bombay v. Chimniram Motilal adjudicated in the Bombay...
Emperor v. Miss Maniben L. Kara: Defining Legal Boundaries of Hate Speech under IPC Sections 124A and 153A

Emperor v. Miss Maniben L. Kara: Defining Legal Boundaries of Hate Speech under IPC Sections 124A and 153A

Date: Aug 20, 1932
Emperor v. Miss Maniben L. Kara: Defining Legal Boundaries of Hate Speech under IPC Sections 124A and 153A Introduction The case of Emperor v. Miss Maniben L. Kara, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Revocation of Letters of Administration on Grounds of Fraud: George Anthony Harris v. Millicent Spencer

Revocation of Letters of Administration on Grounds of Fraud: George Anthony Harris v. Millicent Spencer

Date: Aug 12, 1932
Revocation of Letters of Administration on Grounds of Fraud: George Anthony Harris v. Millicent Spencer Introduction The case of George Anthony Harris v. Millicent Spencer adjudicated by the Bombay...
Pendente Lite Administration in Succession Disputes: Insights from Pandurang Shamrao Laud v. Dwarkadas Kalliandas

Pendente Lite Administration in Succession Disputes: Insights from Pandurang Shamrao Laud v. Dwarkadas Kalliandas

Date: Aug 5, 1932
Pendente Lite Administration in Succession Disputes: Insights from Pandurang Shamrao Laud v. Dwarkadas Kalliandas Introduction Pandurang Shamrao Laud v. Dwarkadas Kalliandas is a landmark judgment...
Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar v. Emperor: Defining Judicial Superintendence and Sentencing Discretion

Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar v. Emperor: Defining Judicial Superintendence and Sentencing Discretion

Date: Jul 21, 1932
Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar v. Emperor: Defining Judicial Superintendence and Sentencing Discretion Introduction The case of Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar v. Emperor adjudicated by the Bombay High Court...
Restricting Transferee's Rights under Article 44 of the Limitation Act in Property Disputes: Insights from Jhaverbhai Hathibhai Patel v. Kabhai Becher Patel

Restricting Transferee's Rights under Article 44 of the Limitation Act in Property Disputes: Insights from Jhaverbhai Hathibhai Patel v. Kabhai Becher Patel

Date: Jul 20, 1932
Restricting Transferee's Rights under Article 44 of the Limitation Act in Property Disputes: Insights from Jhaverbhai Hathibhai Patel v. Kabhai Becher Patel Introduction The case of Jhaverbhai...
Impact of Arbitration-Induced Partition on Prior Mortgages and Attachments: Insights from Haji Mohammad Afzal Khan v. Malik Abdul Rahman

Impact of Arbitration-Induced Partition on Prior Mortgages and Attachments: Insights from Haji Mohammad Afzal Khan v. Malik Abdul Rahman

Date: Jul 15, 1932
Impact of Arbitration-Induced Partition on Prior Mortgages and Attachments: Insights from Haji Mohammad Afzal Khan v. Malik Abdul Rahman Introduction The case Haji Mohammad Afzal Khan v. Malik Abdul...
Vacuum Oil Company v. The Secretary Of State For India: Defining "Wholesale Cash Price" in Customs Valuation

Vacuum Oil Company v. The Secretary Of State For India: Defining "Wholesale Cash Price" in Customs Valuation

Date: Apr 22, 1932
Vacuum Oil Company v. The Secretary Of State For India: Defining "Wholesale Cash Price" in Customs Valuation Introduction The case of Vacuum Oil Company v. The Secretary Of State For India...
Reinterpreting Forgery: Sanjiv Ratanappa Ronad v. Emperor

Reinterpreting Forgery: Sanjiv Ratanappa Ronad v. Emperor

Date: Mar 31, 1932
Reinterpreting Forgery: Sanjiv Ratanappa Ronad v. Emperor Introduction The case of Sanjiv Ratanappa Ronad And Another v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 30, 1932, serves as a...
Capital Receipts vs. Income: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shaw, Wallace And Co.

Capital Receipts vs. Income: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shaw, Wallace And Co.

Date: Mar 15, 1932
Capital Receipts vs. Income: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shaw, Wallace And Co. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shaw, Wallace And Co. adjudicated by the Bombay...
Maintenance Payments Not Treated as Taxable Income: Insights from Raja Bejoy Singh Dudhuria v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Maintenance Payments Not Treated as Taxable Income: Insights from Raja Bejoy Singh Dudhuria v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Mar 11, 1932
Maintenance Payments Not Treated as Taxable Income: Insights from Raja Bejoy Singh Dudhuria v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Raja Bejoy Singh Dudhuria v. The Commissioner Of...
Advocate's Privilege in Defamation: Insights from Tulsidas Amanmal Karani v. S.F Billimoria

Advocate's Privilege in Defamation: Insights from Tulsidas Amanmal Karani v. S.F Billimoria

Date: Mar 9, 1932
Advocate's Privilege in Defamation: Insights from Tulsidas Amanmal Karani v. S.F Billimoria Introduction The case of Tulsidas Amanmal Karani v. S.F Billimoria, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Clarifying the Cognizability of Offenses under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act: Raghunath Lahanusa Walvekar v. Emperor

Clarifying the Cognizability of Offenses under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act: Raghunath Lahanusa Walvekar v. Emperor

Date: Mar 5, 1932
Clarifying the Cognizability of Offenses under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act: Raghunath Lahanusa Walvekar v. Emperor Introduction The case of Raghunath Lahanusa Walvekar v. Emperor...
Establishing the Necessity of Animus in Easement Acquisition: Insights from Marghabhai v. Motibhai Mithabhai

Establishing the Necessity of Animus in Easement Acquisition: Insights from Marghabhai v. Motibhai Mithabhai

Date: Mar 2, 1932
Establishing the Necessity of Animus in Easement Acquisition: Insights from Marghabhai v. Motibhai Mithabhai Introduction Marghabhai v. Motibhai Mithabhai, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert