Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta

Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta

Date: Jun 17, 1938
Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust

Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust

Date: May 4, 1938
Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust Introduction The case of Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on May 3, 1938, revolves...
Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas

Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas

Date: Apr 8, 1938
Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas Introduction In the landmark case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas (Bombay High...
Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A

Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A

Date: Apr 6, 1938
Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A Introduction The case of...
Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees

Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees

Date: Mar 24, 1938
Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay v....
Legal Commentary on Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq

Legal Commentary on Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq

Date: Mar 19, 1938
Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq: A Landmark Judgment on Sovereign Entities and Civil Procedure 1. Introduction The case Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq,...
Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings

Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings

Date: Mar 18, 1938
Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Parvatibai v. Vinayak Balvant Jangam, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898

Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898

Date: Feb 18, 1938
Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 Introduction The case of Babulal...
Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram

Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram

Date: Jan 22, 1938
Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram 1. Introduction The case of Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar...
Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions

Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions

Date: Jan 15, 1938
Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions Introduction The case of Narayan Jivaji Patil v. Gurunathgouda Khandappagouda Patil adjudicated by the...
Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu Mali: Clarifying the Jurisdiction of High Courts in Revising Orders Under s. 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code

Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu Mali: Clarifying the Jurisdiction of High Courts in Revising Orders Under s. 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code

Date: Dec 2, 1937
Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu Mali: Clarifying the Jurisdiction of High Courts in Revising Orders Under s. 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code Introduction Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu Mali is a landmark case...
Restoration of Summons: The Landmark Decision in P.D. Shamdasani v. Central Bank of India Ltd.

Restoration of Summons: The Landmark Decision in P.D. Shamdasani v. Central Bank of India Ltd.

Date: Oct 16, 1937
Restoration of Summons: The Landmark Decision in P.D. Shamdasani v. Central Bank of India Ltd. Introduction The case of P.D. Shamdasani And Others v. Central Bank Of India Ltd., adjudicated by the...
Severance of Interest and Continuation of Jointness Among Coparceners: Rudragouda Venkangouda Patil v. Basangouda Danappagouda Patil

Severance of Interest and Continuation of Jointness Among Coparceners: Rudragouda Venkangouda Patil v. Basangouda Danappagouda Patil

Date: Aug 25, 1937
Severance of Interest and Continuation of Jointness Among Coparceners: Rudragouda Venkangouda Patil v. Basangouda Danappagouda Patil Introduction The case of Rudragouda Venkangouda Patil v....
Estoppel Under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act in Property Lease Disputes: Kumar Krishna Prosad Lal Singha Deo v. The Baraboni Coal Concern Limited

Estoppel Under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act in Property Lease Disputes: Kumar Krishna Prosad Lal Singha Deo v. The Baraboni Coal Concern Limited

Date: Jun 5, 1937
Estoppel Under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act in Property Lease Disputes: Kumar Krishna Prosad Lal Singha Deo v. The Baraboni Coal Concern Limited Introduction The case of Kumar Krishna...
Prerogative of the Crown Overrides Implied Employment Contracts: Krishnaji Nilkant Pitkar v. Secretary Of State

Prerogative of the Crown Overrides Implied Employment Contracts: Krishnaji Nilkant Pitkar v. Secretary Of State

Date: Jan 12, 1937
Prerogative of the Crown Overrides Implied Employment Contracts: Krishnaji Nilkant Pitkar v. Secretary Of State Introduction Krishnaji Nilkant Pitkar v. Secretary Of State is a landmark judgment...
R.T. Rangachari v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council: Upholding Statutory Safeguards in Civil Service Pensions

R.T. Rangachari v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council: Upholding Statutory Safeguards in Civil Service Pensions

Date: Dec 9, 1936
R.T. Rangachari v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council: Upholding Statutory Safeguards in Civil Service Pensions 1. Introduction R.T. Rangachari v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council...
R. Venkata Rao v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council: Establishing the Non-Actionable Nature of Wrongful Dismissal in Indian Civil Service

R. Venkata Rao v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council: Establishing the Non-Actionable Nature of Wrongful Dismissal in Indian Civil Service

Date: Dec 9, 1936
Establishing the Non-Actionable Nature of Wrongful Dismissal in Indian Civil Service Introduction R. Venkata Rao v. The Secretary Of State For India In Council is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Enforceability of Family Maintenance Claims from Wakf Estates: Saiyad Jaffar El Edrus v. Saiyad Mahomed El Edrus

Enforceability of Family Maintenance Claims from Wakf Estates: Saiyad Jaffar El Edrus v. Saiyad Mahomed El Edrus

Date: Nov 24, 1936
Enforceability of Family Maintenance Claims from Wakf Estates: Saiyad Jaffar El Edrus v. Saiyad Mahomed El Edrus Introduction The case of Saiyad Jaffar El Edrus v. Saiyad Mahomed El Edrus And Others,...
Affirmation of the Limits on Widow’s Power to Adopt in Joint Hindu Families: Balu Sakharam Powar v. Lahoo Sambhaji Tetgura (Bombay High Court, 1936)

Affirmation of the Limits on Widow’s Power to Adopt in Joint Hindu Families: Balu Sakharam Powar v. Lahoo Sambhaji Tetgura (Bombay High Court, 1936)

Date: Oct 17, 1936
Affirmation of the Limits on Widow’s Power to Adopt in Joint Hindu Families: Balu Sakharam Powar v. Lahoo Sambhaji Tetgura (Bombay High Court, 1936) Introduction In the landmark case of Balu Sakharam...
Exclusion of Time for Obtaining Decree Copies in Appeal Computation - Murlidhar Shrinivas v. Motilal Ramkumar

Exclusion of Time for Obtaining Decree Copies in Appeal Computation - Murlidhar Shrinivas v. Motilal Ramkumar

Date: Oct 15, 1936
Exclusion of Time for Obtaining Decree Copies in Appeal Computation Introduction The case of Murlidhar Shrinivas v. Motilal Ramkumar, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on October 14, 1936,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert