Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Limitation and Alienation in Joint Hindu Family Property: Bai Shevantibai v. Janardan R. Warick

Limitation and Alienation in Joint Hindu Family Property: Bai Shevantibai v. Janardan R. Warick

Date: Mar 18, 1939
Limitation and Alienation in Joint Hindu Family Property: Bai Shevantibai v. Janardan R. Warick Introduction The case of Bai Shevantibai v. Janardan R. Warick adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 476 CPC: Analysis of Bhagwandas Narandas v. D.D. Patel & Co.

Clarifying the Scope of Section 476 CPC: Analysis of Bhagwandas Narandas v. D.D. Patel & Co.

Date: Mar 9, 1939
Clarifying the Scope of Section 476 CPC: Analysis of Bhagwandas Narandas v. D.D. Patel & Co. Introduction The case of Bhagwandas Narandas v. D.D. Patel & Co. adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Discharge of Guarantor Liability: Insights from Mahant Singh v. U Ba Yi (1939)

Discharge of Guarantor Liability: Insights from Mahant Singh v. U Ba Yi (1939)

Date: Mar 4, 1939
Discharge of Guarantor Liability: Insights from Mahant Singh v. U Ba Yi (1939) Introduction Mahant Singh v. U Ba Yi, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 3, 1939, serves as a pivotal case in...
Enhanced Valuation of Special Adaptability in Compulsory Land Acquisition

Enhanced Valuation of Special Adaptability in Compulsory Land Acquisition

Date: Feb 24, 1939
Enhanced Valuation of Special Adaptability in Compulsory Land Acquisition Introduction The case of Sri Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju Bahadur Garu v. The Revenue Divisional Officer adjudicated...
Admissibility of Deceased's Testimony and Accused's Statements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor

Admissibility of Deceased's Testimony and Accused's Statements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor

Date: Jan 20, 1939
Admissibility of Deceased's Testimony and Accused's Statements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor Introduction Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Extension of Limitation Through Official Acknowledgment in Mortgage Suits: The Bubane v. Warad Case

Extension of Limitation Through Official Acknowledgment in Mortgage Suits: The Bubane v. Warad Case

Date: Nov 9, 1938
Extension of Limitation Through Official Acknowledgment in Mortgage Suits: The Bubane v. Warad Case Introduction The landmark case of Bhalchandra Dattatraya Bubane v. Chanbasappa Mallappa Warad,...
Recognition of Commission Sharing as Revenue Expenditure: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Tata Sons Ltd.

Recognition of Commission Sharing as Revenue Expenditure: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Tata Sons Ltd.

Date: Nov 5, 1938
Recognition of Commission Sharing as Revenue Expenditure: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Tata Sons Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay v. Tata Sons Ltd. adjudicated by the...
Ramchandra Rango Sawkar And Others Accused v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Misjoinder of Charges and Jurisdictional Limits under Indian Criminal Procedure Code

Ramchandra Rango Sawkar And Others Accused v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Misjoinder of Charges and Jurisdictional Limits under Indian Criminal Procedure Code

Date: Oct 7, 1938
Ramchandra Rango Sawkar And Others Accused v. Emperor: Landmark Judgment on Misjoinder of Charges and Jurisdictional Limits under Indian Criminal Procedure Code Introduction The case of Ramchandra...
Gross Negligence of Guardians Does Not Entitle Minors to Set Aside Court Decrees: Chandavarkar v. Shetti

Gross Negligence of Guardians Does Not Entitle Minors to Set Aside Court Decrees: Chandavarkar v. Shetti

Date: Sep 3, 1938
Gross Negligence of Guardians Does Not Entitle Minors to Set Aside Court Decrees: Chandavarkar v. Shetti Introduction The case Krishnadas Padmanabhrao Chandavarkar v. Vithoba Annappa Shetti was...
Ensuring Natural Justice in Member Expulsion: Insights from Ambalal Sarabhai v. Phiroz H. Antia

Ensuring Natural Justice in Member Expulsion: Insights from Ambalal Sarabhai v. Phiroz H. Antia

Date: Jul 7, 1938
Ensuring Natural Justice in Member Expulsion: Insights from Ambalal Sarabhai v. Phiroz H. Antia Introduction The landmark case of Ambalal Sarabhai v. Phiroz H. Antia adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta

Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta

Date: Jun 17, 1938
Determining the Source of Profits for Taxation: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chunilal B. Mehta adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust

Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust

Date: May 4, 1938
Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand: Affirming the Burden of Proof in Determining Public Trust Introduction The case of Parma Nand v. Nihal Chand adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on May 3, 1938, revolves...
Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas

Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas

Date: Apr 8, 1938
Finality of Tax Assessments and Time Limitations: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas Introduction In the landmark case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Khemchand Ramdas (Bombay High...
Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A

Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A

Date: Apr 6, 1938
Tukaram Ganpatrao Surve v. Atmaram Vinayak Gondhalekar: Defining Tangibility of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages and the Retrospective Scope of Section 53A Introduction The case of...
Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees

Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees

Date: Mar 24, 1938
Establishing Boundaries of Document Production Under Income-Tax Act: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Bombay Trust Corporation Assessees Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay v....
Legal Commentary on Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq

Legal Commentary on Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq

Date: Mar 19, 1938
Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq: A Landmark Judgment on Sovereign Entities and Civil Procedure 1. Introduction The case Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Hafiz Habib Ul Haq,...
Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings

Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings

Date: Mar 18, 1938
Parvatibai v. Jangam: Defining the Boundaries of Surety Bonds in Court Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Parvatibai v. Vinayak Balvant Jangam, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898

Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898

Date: Feb 18, 1938
Comprehensive Commentary on Babulal Choukhani And Sailendra Nath Mukherjee v. King-Emperor: Interpretation of Section 239(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 Introduction The case of Babulal...
Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram

Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram

Date: Jan 22, 1938
Revisiting Limitation Periods Under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act: Insights from Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar Shivlal Dayaram 1. Introduction The case of Sheth Maneklal Kalidas v. Luvar...
Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions

Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions

Date: Jan 15, 1938
Narayan Patil v. Gurunath Patil: Enforcing Statutory Limitation without Equitable Exceptions Introduction The case of Narayan Jivaji Patil v. Gurunathgouda Khandappagouda Patil adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert