Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Special Empowerment for Warrant Issuance Affirmed in Emperor v. Joshi (1947)

Special Empowerment for Warrant Issuance Affirmed in Emperor v. Joshi (1947)

Date: Mar 18, 1947
Special Empowerment for Warrant Issuance Affirmed in Emperor v. Savalaram Kashinath Joshi And Others Accused (1947) Introduction The case of Emperor v. Savalaram Kashinath Joshi And Others Accused is...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Quo Warranto Actions: Insights from Moulvi Hamid Hassan Nomani v. Banwarilal Roy

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Quo Warranto Actions: Insights from Moulvi Hamid Hassan Nomani v. Banwarilal Roy

Date: Mar 6, 1947
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Quo Warranto Actions: Insights from Moulvi Hamid Hassan Nomani v. Banwarilal Roy Introduction The case of Moulvi Hamid Hassan Nomani v. Banwarilal Roy adjudicated by the...
Recognition of Joint Tenancy Under Mahomedan Law: Mahomed Jusab Abdulla v. Fatmabai Jusab Abdulla

Recognition of Joint Tenancy Under Mahomedan Law: Mahomed Jusab Abdulla v. Fatmabai Jusab Abdulla

Date: Jan 10, 1947
Recognition of Joint Tenancy Under Mahomedan Law: Mahomed Jusab Abdulla v. Fatmabai Jusab Abdulla Introduction The case of Mahomed Jusab Abdulla v. Fatmabai Jusab Abdulla adjudicated by the Bombay...
Guidelines on Transfer of Cases and Standardization of Sentencing: Insights from Usman Haroon v. Emperor

Guidelines on Transfer of Cases and Standardization of Sentencing: Insights from Usman Haroon v. Emperor

Date: Jan 8, 1947
Guidelines on Transfer of Cases and Standardization of Sentencing: Insights from Usman Haroon v. Emperor Introduction The case of Usman Haroon v. Emperor presented before the Bombay High Court on...
Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor: Adherence to Section 162 CrPC and Interpretation of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act

Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor: Adherence to Section 162 CrPC and Interpretation of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Dec 20, 1946
Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor: Adherence to Section 162 CrPC and Interpretation of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor is a landmark 1946 judgment...
Abdallakhan v. Purshottam Damodar Sura: Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Period in Section 53 TP Act Suits

Abdallakhan v. Purshottam Damodar Sura: Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Period in Section 53 TP Act Suits

Date: Dec 17, 1946
Abdallakhan v. Purshottam Damodar Sura: Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Period in Section 53 TP Act Suits Introduction The case of Abdallakhan v. Purshottam Damodar Sura, adjudicated by...
Strict Enforcement of Attestation Requirements for Deeds of Gift: Timmavva Dundappa Budihal v. Channava Appaya Kanasgeri

Strict Enforcement of Attestation Requirements for Deeds of Gift: Timmavva Dundappa Budihal v. Channava Appaya Kanasgeri

Date: Dec 14, 1946
Strict Enforcement of Attestation Requirements for Deeds of Gift: Timmavva Dundappa Budihal v. Channava Appaya Kanasgeri Introduction The case of Timmavva Dundappa Budihal v. Channava Appaya...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Rent Control: Analysis of Manibhai Hathibhai Patel & Another v. C.W.E Arbuthnot

Jurisdictional Clarity in Rent Control: Analysis of Manibhai Hathibhai Patel & Another v. C.W.E Arbuthnot

Date: Dec 13, 1946
Jurisdictional Clarity in Rent Control: Analysis of Manibhai Hathibhai Patel & Another v. C.W.E Arbuthnot Introduction The case of Manibhai Hathibhai Patel And Another v. C.W.E Arbuthnot, adjudicated...
Deductibility of Goodwill Payments as Revenue Expenditure under Income-tax Act: Vithaldas Thakordas v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Deductibility of Goodwill Payments as Revenue Expenditure under Income-tax Act: Vithaldas Thakordas v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 9, 1946
Deductibility of Goodwill Payments as Revenue Expenditure under Income-tax Act Introduction The case of Vithaldas Thakordas & Co. Assesses v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay adjudicated by the...
Limitation of Arbitration Agreements in Multi-Party Litigation: Chimanram Motilal v. Vandravandas Gordhandas

Limitation of Arbitration Agreements in Multi-Party Litigation: Chimanram Motilal v. Vandravandas Gordhandas

Date: Sep 17, 1946
Limitation of Arbitration Agreements in Multi-Party Litigation: Chimanram Motilal v. Vandravandas Gordhandas Introduction The case of Firm Chimanram Motilal v. Firm Vandravandas Gordhandas was...
Director's Remuneration as Income from Other Sources: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Lady Nawajbai Tata

Director's Remuneration as Income from Other Sources: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Lady Nawajbai Tata

Date: Sep 12, 1946
Director's Remuneration as Income from Other Sources: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Lady Nawajbai Tata Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Lady Nawajbai Tata,...
Inherent Jurisdiction to Modify Court Schemes: Analysis of Gangaram Govind Pashankar v. Sardar K.R. Vinchurkar

Inherent Jurisdiction to Modify Court Schemes: Analysis of Gangaram Govind Pashankar v. Sardar K.R. Vinchurkar

Date: Aug 27, 1946
Inherent Jurisdiction to Modify Court Schemes: Analysis of Gangaram Govind Pashankar v. Sardar K.R. Vinchurkar Introduction Gangaram Govind Pashankar v. Sardar K.R. Vinchurkar is a seminal judgment...
Applying Justice and Right in Mixed Personal Law Matrimonial Suits: Robaba Khanum v. Khodadad Boman Irani

Applying Justice and Right in Mixed Personal Law Matrimonial Suits: Robaba Khanum v. Khodadad Boman Irani

Date: Aug 23, 1946
Applying Justice and Right in Mixed Personal Law Matrimonial Suits: Robaba Khanum v. Khodadad Boman Irani 1. Introduction Robaba Khanum v. Khodadad Boman Irani is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Recognition of Redemption Rights for Official Assignee in Pledged Share Transactions: Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu

Recognition of Redemption Rights for Official Assignee in Pledged Share Transactions: Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu

Date: Aug 22, 1946
Recognition of Redemption Rights for Official Assignee in Pledged Share Transactions: Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu Introduction The case of Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal...
Magistrate’s Jurisdiction in Cognizable Cases Amid Legislative Conflicts: Rustom Ardeshir Banaji v. Imperator

Magistrate’s Jurisdiction in Cognizable Cases Amid Legislative Conflicts: Rustom Ardeshir Banaji v. Imperator

Date: Aug 22, 1946
Magistrate’s Jurisdiction in Cognizable Cases Amid Legislative Conflicts: Rustom Ardeshir Banaji v. Imperator Introduction The case of Rustom Ardeshir Banaji v. Imperator adjudicated by the Bombay...
Establishing Reasonable Time for Performance Under the Indian Sale of Goods Act: Dinkarrai Lalit Kumar v. Sukhdayal Rambilas

Establishing Reasonable Time for Performance Under the Indian Sale of Goods Act: Dinkarrai Lalit Kumar v. Sukhdayal Rambilas

Date: Aug 20, 1946
Establishing Reasonable Time for Performance Under the Indian Sale of Goods Act: Dinkarrai Lalit Kumar v. Sukhdayal Rambilas Introduction The case of Dinkarrai Lalit Kumar v. Sukhdayal Rambilas...
Hereditary Rights and Government Authority: A Commentary on Syed Asrar Ahmed v. The Durgah Committee

Hereditary Rights and Government Authority: A Commentary on Syed Asrar Ahmed v. The Durgah Committee

Date: Jul 30, 1946
Hereditary Rights and Government Authority: A Commentary on Syed Asrar Ahmed v. The Durgah Committee Introduction Syed Asrar Ahmed v. The Durgah Committee is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Negligence in Bank Handling of Drafts: Maturi C. Sanyasilingam v. Exchange Bank India And Africa, Ltd.

Negligence in Bank Handling of Drafts: Maturi C. Sanyasilingam v. Exchange Bank India And Africa, Ltd.

Date: Jul 16, 1946
Negligence in Bank Handling of Drafts: Maturi C. Sanyasilingam v. Exchange Bank India And Africa, Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Maturi C. Sanyasilingam v. Exchange Bank India And Africa, Ltd. was...
Proper Recording and Consideration of Guilty Pleas in Capital Cases: Insights from Abdul Kader Allarakhia v. Emperor

Proper Recording and Consideration of Guilty Pleas in Capital Cases: Insights from Abdul Kader Allarakhia v. Emperor

Date: Apr 17, 1946
Proper Recording and Consideration of Guilty Pleas in Capital Cases: Insights from Abdul Kader Allarakhia v. Emperor Introduction The case of Abdul Kader Allarakhia Accused v. Emperor, adjudicated by...
Defining the Jurisdiction and Remedies under the Bombay Rent Act: Analysis of Mody v. Rent Controller of Bombay (1946)

Defining the Jurisdiction and Remedies under the Bombay Rent Act: Analysis of Mody v. Rent Controller of Bombay (1946)

Date: Apr 11, 1946
Defining the Jurisdiction and Remedies under the Bombay Rent Act: Analysis of Mody v. Rent Controller of Bombay (1946) Introduction The case of Mrs. Khurshed Feroze Mody (Petitioner) v. The Rent...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert