Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Determining Employee Status: Insights from S.H Motor Transport Co. v. Motilal Hiralal Mudholkar

Determining Employee Status: Insights from S.H Motor Transport Co. v. Motilal Hiralal Mudholkar

Date: Feb 5, 1964
Determining Employee Status: Insights from S.H Motor Transport Co. v. Motilal Hiralal Mudholkar Introduction The case of S.H Motor Transport Co. v. Motilal Hiralal Mudholkar, decided by the Bombay...
Defining "Factory" Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Insights from Messrs Bank Silver Company v. ESI Corporation

Defining "Factory" Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Insights from Messrs Bank Silver Company v. ESI Corporation

Date: Jan 31, 1964
Defining "Factory" Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Insights from Messrs Bank Silver Company v. ESI Corporation Introduction The case of Messrs Bank Silver Company, Bombay v. The Employees'...
Clarifying Labour Court's Authority to Overrule Dismissals for Misconduct Under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act

Clarifying Labour Court's Authority to Overrule Dismissals for Misconduct Under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act

Date: Nov 29, 1963
Clarifying Labour Court's Authority to Overrule Dismissals for Misconduct Under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act Introduction The case of Vithoba Maruti Chavan v. S. Taki Bilgrami adjudicated by...
Expansive Interpretation of Order XXXVII Rule 4 in Ramchandra Dhondu Dalvi v. Vithaldas Gokaldas

Expansive Interpretation of Order XXXVII Rule 4 in Ramchandra Dhondu Dalvi v. Vithaldas Gokaldas

Date: Nov 16, 1963
Expansive Interpretation of Order XXXVII Rule 4 in Ramchandra Dhondu Dalvi v. Vithaldas Gokaldas Introduction The case of Ramchandra Dhondu Dalvi v. Vithaldas Gokaldas adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Clarifying Corporate Criminal Liability for Mens Rea Offences: The State Of Maharashtra v. Syndicate Transport Company Pvt. Ltd.

Clarifying Corporate Criminal Liability for Mens Rea Offences: The State Of Maharashtra v. Syndicate Transport Company Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Sep 27, 1963
Clarifying Corporate Criminal Liability for Mens Rea Offences: The State Of Maharashtra v. Syndicate Transport Company Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The landmark case of The State Of Maharashtra v. Messrs...
Broad Interpretation of IPC Section 120-B for International Conspiracies: Abdul Kadar Saleh Mohomad v. The State Of Maharashtra

Broad Interpretation of IPC Section 120-B for International Conspiracies: Abdul Kadar Saleh Mohomad v. The State Of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 22, 1963
Broad Interpretation of IPC Section 120-B for International Conspiracies: Abdul Kadar Saleh Mohomad v. The State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Abdul Kadar Saleh Mohomad v. The State Of...
Shreelal Kajaria v. The State: Judicial Discretion Under Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Shreelal Kajaria v. The State: Judicial Discretion Under Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Date: Jul 9, 1963
Shreelal Kajaria v. The State: Judicial Discretion Under Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code Introduction Shreelal Kajaria v. The State is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Ramubai v. Jiyaram Sharma: Clarifying Notice Requirements for Joint Tenants in Ejectment Actions

Ramubai v. Jiyaram Sharma: Clarifying Notice Requirements for Joint Tenants in Ejectment Actions

Date: Apr 25, 1963
Ramubai v. Jiyaram Sharma: Clarifying Notice Requirements for Joint Tenants in Ejectment Actions Introduction The case of Ramubai v. Jiyaram Sharma adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on April 24,...
Judgment Analysis: Revisional Powers under Section 25 of the Wealth-tax Act

Judgment Analysis: Revisional Powers under Section 25 of the Wealth-tax Act

Date: Apr 23, 1963
Judgment Analysis: Revisional Powers under Section 25 of the Wealth-tax Act Introduction Jagmohandas Gokaldas v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Bombay., adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on April 22,...
Ensuring Independence: Bombay High Court’s Precedent on Advisory Board Composition under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948

Ensuring Independence: Bombay High Court’s Precedent on Advisory Board Composition under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948

Date: Apr 11, 1963
Ensuring Independence: Bombay High Court’s Precedent on Advisory Board Composition under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Introduction The case of Ramkrishna Ramnath v. The State Of Maharashtra,...
Affirmation of Special Court Jurisdiction in Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Ramkishore Pandit v. Vijayabahadursingh Jagtapsingh

Affirmation of Special Court Jurisdiction in Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Ramkishore Pandit v. Vijayabahadursingh Jagtapsingh

Date: Apr 10, 1963
Affirmation of Special Court Jurisdiction in Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Ramkishore Pandit v. Vijayabahadursingh Jagtapsingh Introduction The case of Ramkishore Pandit v. Vijayabahadursingh Jagtapsingh...
Deduction of Accumulated Depreciation in Wealth-Tax Computation

Deduction of Accumulated Depreciation in Wealth-Tax Computation

Date: Apr 9, 1963
Deduction of Accumulated Depreciation in Wealth-Tax Computation Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax, Bombay City v. Indian Standard Metal Company Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Affirming Time-Bound Notice Issuance and Declaring the Second Proviso to Section 34 Unconstitutional: Mahendra Bhawanji Thakar v. S.P Pande

Affirming Time-Bound Notice Issuance and Declaring the Second Proviso to Section 34 Unconstitutional: Mahendra Bhawanji Thakar v. S.P Pande

Date: Mar 7, 1963
Affirming Time-Bound Notice Issuance and Declaring the Second Proviso to Section 34 Unconstitutional Introduction Mahendra Bhawanji Thakar v. S.P Pande is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Bombay...
Strict Verification Standards for Affidavits Established in Rajkumar v. Bharat Oil Mills

Strict Verification Standards for Affidavits Established in Rajkumar v. Bharat Oil Mills

Date: Jan 15, 1963
Strict Verification Standards for Affidavits Established in Rajkumar v. Bharat Oil Mills Introduction The case of Messrs Shamsunder Rajkumar v. Messrs Bharat Oil Mills, Nagpur adjudicated by the...
Implied Surrender of Lease upon Execution of Mortgage: An Analysis of Narayan Dogra Shetty v. Ramchandra Shivram Hingne

Implied Surrender of Lease upon Execution of Mortgage: An Analysis of Narayan Dogra Shetty v. Ramchandra Shivram Hingne

Date: Dec 11, 1962
Implied Surrender of Lease upon Execution of Mortgage: An Analysis of Narayan Dogra Shetty v. Ramchandra Shivram Hingne Introduction The case of Narayan Dogra Shetty v. Ramchandra Shivram Hingne...
Scope of Section 25(1) in Hindu Marriage Act: Alimony Without Decree Not Permitted – Shantaram Dinkar Karnik v. Malti Shantaram Karnik

Scope of Section 25(1) in Hindu Marriage Act: Alimony Without Decree Not Permitted – Shantaram Dinkar Karnik v. Malti Shantaram Karnik

Date: Nov 22, 1962
Scope of Section 25(1) in Hindu Marriage Act: Alimony Without Decree Not Permitted – Shantaram Dinkar Karnik v. Malti Shantaram Karnik Introduction The case of Shantaram Dinkar Karnik v. Malti...
Voluntary Payments Without Definite Source Not Taxable: Insights from H.H Maharaja v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay High Court, 1962

Voluntary Payments Without Definite Source Not Taxable: Insights from H.H Maharaja v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay High Court, 1962

Date: Oct 20, 1962
Voluntary Payments Without Definite Source Not Taxable: Insights from H.H Maharaja v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay High Court, 1962 Introduction The case of H.H Maharaja Shri Vejaykuverba Saheb...
Limitations on Appeals in Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4) of the Indian Income Tax Act: Gaurishanker Kedia v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II

Limitations on Appeals in Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4) of the Indian Income Tax Act: Gaurishanker Kedia v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II

Date: Oct 18, 1962
Limitation of Appeal Grounds in Section 23(4) Assessments: Gaurishanker Kedia v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II Introduction The case of Gaurishanker Kedia v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Capital Gains vs. Business Income: Insights from Killick Nixon v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Capital Gains vs. Business Income: Insights from Killick Nixon v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 14, 1962
Capital Gains vs. Business Income: Insights from Killick Nixon And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Killick Nixon And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I. was...
Beneficiary Taxation of Trust Income: Trustees Of Chaturbhuj Raghavji Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Beneficiary Taxation of Trust Income: Trustees Of Chaturbhuj Raghavji Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 11, 1962
Beneficiary Taxation of Trust Income: Trustees Of Chaturbhuj Raghavji Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Trustees Of Chaturbhuj Raghavji Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert