Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Mandatory Affixation of Taxi Meters on Auto-Rickshaws: Insights from Sunmitra Auto Rickshaw Sahakari Sangh Ltd. v. Director Of Transport

Mandatory Affixation of Taxi Meters on Auto-Rickshaws: Insights from Sunmitra Auto Rickshaw Sahakari Sangh Ltd. v. Director Of Transport

Date: Nov 19, 1966
Mandatory Affixation of Taxi Meters on Auto-Rickshaws: Insights from Sunmitra Auto Rickshaw Sahakari Sangh Ltd. v. Director Of Transport Introduction The case of Sunmitra Auto Rickshaw Sahakari Sangh...
Affirmation of Trustees' Authority to Enforce Public Trusts Independently Under the Bombay Public Trusts Act

Affirmation of Trustees' Authority to Enforce Public Trusts Independently Under the Bombay Public Trusts Act

Date: Nov 17, 1966
Affirmation of Trustees' Authority to Enforce Public Trusts Independently Under the Bombay Public Trusts Act 1. Introduction The case of Rajgopal Raghunathdas Somani v. Ramchandra Hajarimal Jhavar...
Clarification of Mamlatdar's Exclusive Jurisdiction over Tenancy Disputes: Rajaram Totaram Patel v. Mahipat Mahadu Patel

Clarification of Mamlatdar's Exclusive Jurisdiction over Tenancy Disputes: Rajaram Totaram Patel v. Mahipat Mahadu Patel

Date: Oct 28, 1966
Clarification of Mamlatdar's Exclusive Jurisdiction over Tenancy Disputes Rajaram Totaram Patel v. Mahipat Mahadu Patel Court: Bombay High Court Date: October 27, 1966 Introduction The case of...
Compliance with Transfer Procedures Under Section 108: Insights from Patel v. Gordhandas Desai Private Ltd.

Compliance with Transfer Procedures Under Section 108: Insights from Patel v. Gordhandas Desai Private Ltd.

Date: Oct 12, 1966
Compliance with Transfer Procedures Under Section 108: Insights from Patel v. Gordhandas Desai Private Ltd. Introduction The case of Jayanthilal Purshottamdas Patel v. Gordhandas Desai Private Ltd....
Arbitration Act, 1940: Non-Mandatory Umpire Appointment Does Not Invalidate Awards – Modern Builder v. Hukmatrai N. Vaziram

Arbitration Act, 1940: Non-Mandatory Umpire Appointment Does Not Invalidate Awards – Modern Builder v. Hukmatrai N. Vaziram

Date: Sep 28, 1966
Arbitration Act, 1940: Non-Mandatory Umpire Appointment Does Not Invalidate Awards Introduction Messrs Modern Builder v. Hukmatrai N. Vaziram is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court...
State Government's Rule-Making Powers Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Rule 17 Declared Ultra Vires

State Government's Rule-Making Powers Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Rule 17 Declared Ultra Vires

Date: Sep 20, 1966
State Government's Rule-Making Powers Under the Employees' State Insurance Act: Rule 17 Declared Ultra Vires Introduction The case of The Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. M/S. Bharat Barrel...
Equal Treatment in Income Tax Penalties: Shakti Offset Works v. IAC, Bombay High Court

Equal Treatment in Income Tax Penalties: Shakti Offset Works v. IAC, Bombay High Court

Date: Sep 8, 1966
Equal Treatment in Income Tax Penalties: Shakti Offset Works v. IAC, Bombay High Court Introduction The case of Shakti Offset Works v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nagpur, And...
Section 36(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act Not Exhaustive: Expanding Employer Representation Rights

Section 36(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act Not Exhaustive: Expanding Employer Representation Rights

Date: Aug 23, 1966
Section 36(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act Not Exhaustive: Expanding Employer Representation Rights Introduction The case of K.K Khadilkar v. The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay...
Judicial Discretion in Sanctioning Company Reconstruction Schemes: The Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. v. Dr. Shankar Vishnu Marathe

Judicial Discretion in Sanctioning Company Reconstruction Schemes: The Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. v. Dr. Shankar Vishnu Marathe

Date: Aug 21, 1966
Judicial Discretion in Sanctioning Company Reconstruction Schemes: The Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. v. Dr. Shankar Vishnu Marathe Introduction The case of The Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. v. Dr. Shankar...
Interpretation of Section 261(1) of the Companies Act: Insights from Nandlal More v. Ramchandiram Mirchandani

Interpretation of Section 261(1) of the Companies Act: Insights from Nandlal More v. Ramchandiram Mirchandani

Date: Aug 20, 1966
Interpretation of Section 261(1) of the Companies Act: Insights from Nandlal More v. Ramchandiram Mirchandani Introduction Nandlal More v. Ramchandiram Mirchandani is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Termination of Government Service Upon Abolition of Posts: P.V Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra

Termination of Government Service Upon Abolition of Posts: P.V Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 17, 1966
Termination of Government Service Upon Abolition of Posts: P.V Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of P.V Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Bhaskar Narhar Deshmukh v. Kisanlal Sadasukhdas: Clarifying Limitation Periods in Malicious Prosecution

Bhaskar Narhar Deshmukh v. Kisanlal Sadasukhdas: Clarifying Limitation Periods in Malicious Prosecution

Date: Aug 17, 1966
Bhaskar Narhar Deshmukh v. Kisanlal Sadasukhdas: Clarifying Limitation Periods in Malicious Prosecution Introduction Bhaskar Narhar Deshmukh v. Kisanlal Sadasukhdas is a landmark judgment delivered...
Limits on Interim Injunctions in Panchayat Election Petitions: Jagannath Pundlik Date v. Sukhdeo Onkar Wankhede

Limits on Interim Injunctions in Panchayat Election Petitions: Jagannath Pundlik Date v. Sukhdeo Onkar Wankhede

Date: Aug 11, 1966
Limits on Interim Injunctions in Panchayat Election Petitions: Jagannath Pundlik Date v. Sukhdeo Onkar Wankhede Introduction The case of Jagannath Pundlik Date v. Sukhdeo Onkar Wankhede adjudicated...
Conclusive Nature of Voters' List in Panchayat Elections: Dhondba Adku Timande v. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hinganghat

Conclusive Nature of Voters' List in Panchayat Elections: Dhondba Adku Timande v. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hinganghat

Date: Jul 6, 1966
Conclusive Nature of Voters' List in Panchayat Elections: Dhondba Adku Timande v. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hinganghat Introduction The case of Dhondba Adku Timande v. Civil Judge, Junior...
Interpretation of Section 23-A FERA in Relation to the Sea Customs Act: Insights from State v. Lakshmandas Chaganlal Bhatia

Interpretation of Section 23-A FERA in Relation to the Sea Customs Act: Insights from State v. Lakshmandas Chaganlal Bhatia

Date: Apr 28, 1966
Interpretation of Section 23-A FERA in Relation to the Sea Customs Act: Insights from State v. Lakshmandas Chaganlal Bhatia Introduction The case of State v. Lakshmandas Chaganlal Bhatia decided by...
Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. v. G.B Chand: Supreme Rebate on Mineral Oil Production Established

Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. v. G.B Chand: Supreme Rebate on Mineral Oil Production Established

Date: Apr 19, 1966
Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. v. G.B Chand: Supreme Rebate on Mineral Oil Production Established Introduction The case of Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. v. G.B Chand (Income-Tax Officer) And Another,...
Tribunal's Enhanced Appellate Powers in Depreciation Claims: Analysis of Beharilal Ramcharan Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Tribunal's Enhanced Appellate Powers in Depreciation Claims: Analysis of Beharilal Ramcharan Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 26, 1966
Tribunal's Enhanced Appellate Powers in Depreciation Claims: Analysis of Beharilal Ramcharan Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Beharilal Ramcharan Cotton Mills...
Deductibility of Litigation Expenses Under Income Tax: Premier Construction Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Deductibility of Litigation Expenses Under Income Tax: Premier Construction Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 24, 1966
Deductibility of Litigation Expenses Under Income Tax: Premier Construction Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Premier Construction Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Cessation of Trading Liability under Section 10(2A): Insights from J.K Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Cessation of Trading Liability under Section 10(2A): Insights from J.K Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 19, 1966
Cessation of Trading Liability under Section 10(2A): Insights from J.K Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of J.K Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay...
Overwhelming Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions: Palaniswamy v. State

Overwhelming Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions: Palaniswamy v. State

Date: Feb 18, 1966
Overwhelming Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions: Palaniswamy v. State Introduction The case of Palaniswamy Vaiyapuri Original Accused v. State, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert