Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Shah Prabhudas Gulabchand v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Defining Partnership Boundaries within Hindu Undivided Families

Shah Prabhudas Gulabchand v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Defining Partnership Boundaries within Hindu Undivided Families

Date: Feb 4, 1970
Shah Prabhudas Gulabchand v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Defining Partnership Boundaries within Hindu Undivided Families Introduction The case of Shah Prabhudas Gulabchand v. Commissioner Of Income...
Requisition for Removal of Municipal Council President: Insights from Ramkrushna Gangram Rathi v. Kisan Zingraji Madke

Requisition for Removal of Municipal Council President: Insights from Ramkrushna Gangram Rathi v. Kisan Zingraji Madke

Date: Feb 4, 1970
Requisition for Removal of Municipal Council President: Insights from Ramkrushna Gangram Rathi v. Kisan Zingraji Madke Introduction In the landmark case of Ramkrushna Gangram Rathi v. Kisan Zingraji...
Development Rebate Reserve as Accumulated Profits: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central v. P.K. Badiani

Development Rebate Reserve as Accumulated Profits: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central v. P.K. Badiani

Date: Feb 3, 1970
Development Rebate Reserve as Accumulated Profits: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax Central v. P.K. Badiani Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, Bombay v. P.K....
Interpretation of Exemption Clauses in Bailee Contracts: Balkrishan R. Dayma v. Bank Of Jaipur, Ltd.

Interpretation of Exemption Clauses in Bailee Contracts: Balkrishan R. Dayma v. Bank Of Jaipur, Ltd.

Date: Jan 15, 1970
Interpretation of Exemption Clauses in Bailee Contracts: Balkrishan R. Dayma v. Bank Of Jaipur, Ltd. Introduction Balkrishan R. Dayma v. Bank Of Jaipur, Ltd. And Another is a landmark judgment...
Trial Court’s Authority to Extend Time in Specific Performance: Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar v. Bapu Keshav Jadhav

Trial Court’s Authority to Extend Time in Specific Performance: Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar v. Bapu Keshav Jadhav

Date: Dec 18, 1969
Trial Court’s Authority to Extend Time in Specific Performance: Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar v. Bapu Keshav Jadhav Introduction Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar v. Bapu Keshav Jadhav is a landmark case...
Dinkar Bandhu Deshmukh v. State: Establishing Corroboration Standards in Murder Cases

Dinkar Bandhu Deshmukh v. State: Establishing Corroboration Standards in Murder Cases

Date: Nov 26, 1969
Dinkar Bandhu Deshmukh v. State: Establishing Corroboration Standards in Murder Cases Introduction The case of Dinkar Bandhu Deshmukh and Another v. State was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Defining 'Appearance' in Civil Procedure: Insights from Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Ltd. v. Rajkumar Lines Limited

Defining 'Appearance' in Civil Procedure: Insights from Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Ltd. v. Rajkumar Lines Limited

Date: Nov 22, 1969
Defining 'Appearance' in Civil Procedure: Insights from Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Ltd. v. Rajkumar Lines Limited Introduction The case of Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Ltd. v....
Firestone Tyre: Conflict of Interest and Director's Fiduciary Duties in Sole Selling Agency Appointments

Firestone Tyre: Conflict of Interest and Director's Fiduciary Duties in Sole Selling Agency Appointments

Date: Nov 8, 1969
Firestone Tyre: Conflict of Interest and Director's Fiduciary Duties in Sole Selling Agency Appointments Introduction The case of Firestone Tyre And Rubber Co. v. Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd. And...
Clarifying Import Trade Control: H.R. Syiem v. P.S. Lulla

Clarifying Import Trade Control: H.R. Syiem v. P.S. Lulla

Date: Oct 11, 1969
Clarifying Import Trade Control: H.R. Syiem v. P.S. Lulla Introduction H.R. Syiem v. P.S. Lulla is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on October 10, 1969. The case revolves around...
Landlord's Obligation to Secure Possession Orders in Tenancy Surrender: Madhao Tatya Sonar v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal

Landlord's Obligation to Secure Possession Orders in Tenancy Surrender: Madhao Tatya Sonar v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal

Date: Sep 13, 1969
Landlord's Obligation to Secure Possession Orders in Tenancy Surrender: Madhao Tatya Sonar v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Introduction The case of Madhao Tatya Sonar v. The Maharashtra Revenue...
Clarifying Ownership and Misdescription in Compensation Claims: Chirawala v. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

Clarifying Ownership and Misdescription in Compensation Claims: Chirawala v. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

Date: Aug 29, 1969
Clarifying Ownership and Misdescription in Compensation Claims: Chirawala v. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Introduction The case Bessarlal Laxmichand Chirawala v. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,...
Distinction Between Capital Investment and Trade Venture: Bhogilal H. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (1969)

Distinction Between Capital Investment and Trade Venture: Bhogilal H. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (1969)

Date: Aug 9, 1969
Distinction Between Capital Investment and Trade Venture: Bhogilal H. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (1969) 1. Introduction The case of Bhogilal H. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central),...
Jurisdictional Clarifications under Section 99B Cr PC and Article 226: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gopal Vinayak Godse v. Union of India

Jurisdictional Clarifications under Section 99B Cr PC and Article 226: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gopal Vinayak Godse v. Union of India

Date: Aug 7, 1969
Jurisdictional Clarifications under Section 99B Cr PC and Article 226: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gopal Vinayak Godse v. Union of India Introduction The case of Gopal Vinayak Godse v. The Union Of...
Defining 'Court' under the Limitation Act: Insights from M/S. Popular Process Studio v. ESI Corp

Defining 'Court' under the Limitation Act: Insights from M/S. Popular Process Studio v. ESI Corp

Date: Aug 1, 1969
Defining 'Court' under the Limitation Act: Insights from M/S. Popular Process Studio v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation Introduction The case of M/S. Popular Process Studio And Another v....
Comprehensive Commentary on Haribhau Shinde v. F.H Lala Industrial Tribunal: Upholding Workers' Rights in Decreasing Dearness Allowance

Comprehensive Commentary on Haribhau Shinde v. F.H Lala Industrial Tribunal: Upholding Workers' Rights in Decreasing Dearness Allowance

Date: Jul 25, 1969
Comprehensive Commentary on Haribhau Shinde v. F.H Lala Industrial Tribunal: Upholding Workers' Rights in Decreasing Dearness Allowance Introduction The case of Haribhau Shinde And Another v. F.H...
Inheriting Surplus Land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act: Insights from Dadarao v. State Of Maharashtra

Inheriting Surplus Land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act: Insights from Dadarao v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Jul 25, 1969
Inheriting Surplus Land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act: Insights from Dadarao v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Dadarao v. State Of Maharashtra,...
Clarifying Qualified Privilege in Defamation: Rustom K. Karanjia v. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey

Clarifying Qualified Privilege in Defamation: Rustom K. Karanjia v. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey

Date: Jul 23, 1969
Clarifying Qualified Privilege in Defamation: Rustom K. Karanjia v. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey Introduction The case of Rustom K. Karanjia v. Krishnaraj M.D. Thackersey adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Classification of Dissolution Expenses as Capital Expenditure: Insights from Adarsha Dugdhalaya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Classification of Dissolution Expenses as Capital Expenditure: Insights from Adarsha Dugdhalaya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jul 19, 1969
Classification of Dissolution Expenses as Capital Expenditure: Insights from Adarsha Dugdhalaya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Adarsha Dugdhalaya v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Representation in Joint Hindu Family Suits Post-Hindu Succession Act: Govindram Mihamal v. Chetumal Villardas

Representation in Joint Hindu Family Suits Post-Hindu Succession Act: Govindram Mihamal v. Chetumal Villardas

Date: Jul 1, 1969
Representation in Joint Hindu Family Suits Post-Hindu Succession Act: Govindram Mihamal v. Chetumal Villardas Introduction The case of Govindram Mihamal v. Chetumal Villardas, adjudicated by the...
Managing Agents’ Discretionary Advances and Employee Settlement Payments as Allowable Business Deductions

Managing Agents’ Discretionary Advances and Employee Settlement Payments as Allowable Business Deductions

Date: Jul 1, 1969
Managing Agents’ Discretionary Advances and Employee Settlement Payments as Allowable Business Deductions 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I v. F.M Chinoy And Co....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert