Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act

Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act

Date: Sep 7, 2017
Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act Introduction In the case of Chandrashekhar S. Bhole Petitioner v. Bhandari...
Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Aug 23, 2017
Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India

Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India

Date: Aug 17, 2017
Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Pushpa v. Union Of India (Bombay High Court, 2017) centers on the plaintiffs' challenge against...
Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Aug 1, 2017
Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v....
Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions

Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions

Date: Jul 27, 2017
Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions Introduction The case of Padma Ashok Bhatt v. Orbit Corporation Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July...
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Date: Jun 30, 2017
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore Introduction The case of United India Insurance Co....
Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala

Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala

Date: Jun 29, 2017
Clarifying the Maintainability of Order IX Rule 13 Applications in CPC Proceedings: Insights from R.P. Bros v. Fakhruddin Siraj Topiwala Introduction The legal landscape concerning the setting aside...
Bombay High Court Establishes Precedent on Generic Disparagement in Commercial Advertising in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd.

Bombay High Court Establishes Precedent on Generic Disparagement in Commercial Advertising in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd.

Date: Jun 17, 2017
Bombay High Court Establishes Precedent on Generic Disparagement in Commercial Advertising in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. Introduction The case of...
Enhanced Compensation Assessment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Seema Sudam Auti And Others

Enhanced Compensation Assessment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Seema Sudam Auti And Others

Date: Jun 10, 2017
Enhanced Compensation Assessment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Seema Sudam Auti And Others Introduction The case of New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Seema Sudam Auti And Others deals with a...
Balvikas Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra: Upholding Standards in Child Care Institutions

Balvikas Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra: Upholding Standards in Child Care Institutions

Date: May 6, 2017
Balvikas Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra: Upholding Standards in Child Care Institutions Introduction The case of Balvikas Sanstha Chalak And Karmachari Sanghatana v. State Of Maharashtra And Others...
Externment Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Police Act: Analysis of Balu @ Balasaheb Jagannath Jadhav v. Divisional Commissioner

Externment Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Police Act: Analysis of Balu @ Balasaheb Jagannath Jadhav v. Divisional Commissioner

Date: May 3, 2017
Externment Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Police Act: Analysis of Balu @ Balasaheb Jagannath Jadhav v. Divisional Commissioner Introduction The case of Balu @ Balasaheb Jagannath Jadhav v. The...
Proper Application of Section 263 in CSR Claims: Insights from Moil Limited v. CIT-I

Proper Application of Section 263 in CSR Claims: Insights from Moil Limited v. CIT-I

Date: Apr 27, 2017
Proper Application of Section 263 in CSR Claims: Insights from Moil Limited v. CIT-I Introduction The case of Moil Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Enforcing Constitutional Equality: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Regularization of Temporary Government Appointments

Enforcing Constitutional Equality: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Regularization of Temporary Government Appointments

Date: Apr 22, 2017
Enforcing Constitutional Equality: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Regularization of Temporary Government Appointments Introduction The case of Sandeep Tulshiram Mohite v. Registrar was adjudicated by...
Bombay High Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in Gratuity Forfeiture: Desai v. UCO Bank

Bombay High Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in Gratuity Forfeiture: Desai v. UCO Bank

Date: Apr 12, 2017
Bombay High Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in Gratuity Forfeiture: Desai v. UCO Bank Introduction In the landmark case of Nanubhai Nichhabhai Desai v. Deputy General Manager, UCO Bank And...
Clarification on Burden of Proof and Documentary Evidence in Section 147 Assessments

Clarification on Burden of Proof and Documentary Evidence in Section 147 Assessments

Date: Apr 11, 2017
Clarification on Burden of Proof and Documentary Evidence in Section 147 Assessments Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd....
Judicial Commentary: Upholding Judicial Integrity in Copyright Infringement Cases

Judicial Commentary: Upholding Judicial Integrity in Copyright Infringement Cases

Date: Mar 22, 2017
Upholding Judicial Integrity in Copyright Infringement Cases: Dashrath B. Rathod v. Fox Star Studios India Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Dashrath B. Rathod v. Fox Star Studios India Pvt. Ltd.,...
Limitation on Arbitral Tribunals to Appoint High Court Receivers under Section 17: Shakti International Pvt Ltd v Excel Metal Processors Pvt Ltd

Limitation on Arbitral Tribunals to Appoint High Court Receivers under Section 17: Shakti International Pvt Ltd v Excel Metal Processors Pvt Ltd

Date: Mar 17, 2017
Limitation on Arbitral Tribunals to Appoint High Court Receivers under Section 17: Shakti International Pvt Ltd v Excel Metal Processors Pvt Ltd Introduction In Shakti International Private Limited...
Duty to Award Just Compensation Under the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from State of Maharashtra v. Kamaladevi Kailashchandra Kaushal

Duty to Award Just Compensation Under the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from State of Maharashtra v. Kamaladevi Kailashchandra Kaushal

Date: Mar 16, 2017
Duty to Award Just Compensation Under the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from State of Maharashtra v. Kamaladevi Kailashchandra Kaushal Introduction The case of State of Maharashtra and Others v....
Judicial Scrutiny Over Postponement of APMC Elections: Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare v. State of Maharashtra

Judicial Scrutiny Over Postponement of APMC Elections: Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Mar 10, 2017
Judicial Scrutiny Over Postponement of APMC Elections: Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare v. State of Maharashtra Introduction In the case of Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare and Another Petitioners v. State of...
Priority of Secured Creditors Over Statutory Charges: Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

Priority of Secured Creditors Over Statutory Charges: Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Mar 8, 2017
Priority of Secured Creditors Over Statutory Charges: Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Axis Bank Limited v. State of Maharashtra adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert