Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Interpretation of Section 5 MTP Act: Medical Termination Beyond 20 Weeks Permitted for Severe Fetal Anomalies - Shaikh Ayesha Khatoon v. Union of India

Interpretation of Section 5 MTP Act: Medical Termination Beyond 20 Weeks Permitted for Severe Fetal Anomalies - Shaikh Ayesha Khatoon v. Union of India

Date: Jan 10, 2018
Interpretation of Section 5 MTP Act: Medical Termination Beyond 20 Weeks Permitted for Severe Fetal Anomalies Introduction Shaikh Ayesha Khatoon v. Union Of India is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Clarifying the Distinction Between Attempt to Rape and Criminal Assault: A Comprehensive Commentary on Shankar v. State Of Maharashtra

Clarifying the Distinction Between Attempt to Rape and Criminal Assault: A Comprehensive Commentary on Shankar v. State Of Maharashtra

Date: Jan 5, 2018
Clarifying the Distinction Between Attempt to Rape and Criminal Assault: A Comprehensive Commentary on Shankar v. State Of Maharashtra Introduction Shankar v. State Of Maharashtra is a pivotal case...
Limits on Reviewing Sanction Orders for Public Servants Under Section 197 CrPC: Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Vidyasagar Rao

Limits on Reviewing Sanction Orders for Public Servants Under Section 197 CrPC: Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Vidyasagar Rao

Date: Dec 23, 2017
Limits on Reviewing Sanction Orders for Public Servants Under Section 197 CrPC: Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Vidyasagar Rao Introduction The case of Ashok Shankarrao Chavan v. Vidyasagar Rao was...
High Court Invalidates Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe Status

High Court Invalidates Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe Status

Date: Dec 23, 2017
High Court Invalidates Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe Status Introduction The landmark case of Motial v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny adjudicated by the Bombay...
Sanghvi Reconditioners Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India: Landmark Judgment on Expeditious Adjudication of Customs Show Cause Notices

Sanghvi Reconditioners Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India: Landmark Judgment on Expeditious Adjudication of Customs Show Cause Notices

Date: Dec 13, 2017
Sanghvi Reconditioners Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India A Landmark Judgment on Expeditious Adjudication of Customs Show Cause Notices Introduction The case of Sanghvi Reconditioners Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of...
Burden of Proof in Company Petitions: Insights from Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Stride Multitrade Pvt. Ltd.

Burden of Proof in Company Petitions: Insights from Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Stride Multitrade Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Dec 9, 2017
Burden of Proof in Company Petitions: Insights from Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Stride Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Stride...
Bombay High Court Upholds Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, Strikes Down Section 46(1)(b)

Bombay High Court Upholds Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, Strikes Down Section 46(1)(b)

Date: Dec 7, 2017
Bombay High Court Upholds Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, Strikes Down Section 46(1)(b) Introduction In the landmark case of Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India, the Bombay...
Kalyan v. State Of Maharashtra: Landmark Judgment on Age Verification and Evidentiary Standards in Gang Rape Cases

Kalyan v. State Of Maharashtra: Landmark Judgment on Age Verification and Evidentiary Standards in Gang Rape Cases

Date: Nov 22, 2017
Kalyan v. State Of Maharashtra: Landmark Judgment on Age Verification and Evidentiary Standards in Gang Rape Cases Introduction In the significant case of Kalyan v. State Of Maharashtra, adjudicated...
Recognition of 'Mana' as a Scheduled Tribe: Comprehensive Legal Commentary on Gajanan v. Head-Master, Govt. Ashram School

Recognition of 'Mana' as a Scheduled Tribe: Comprehensive Legal Commentary on Gajanan v. Head-Master, Govt. Ashram School

Date: Nov 9, 2017
Recognition of 'Mana' as a Scheduled Tribe: Comprehensive Legal Commentary on Gajanan v. Head-Master, Govt. Ashram School Introduction The case of Gajanan v. Head-Master, Govt. Ashram School...
Clarification on Admissibility of Secondary Evidence: No Need for Prior Leave Under Indian Evidence Act

Clarification on Admissibility of Secondary Evidence: No Need for Prior Leave Under Indian Evidence Act

Date: Nov 4, 2017
Clarification on Admissibility of Secondary Evidence: No Need for Prior Leave Under Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of Karthik Gangadhar Bhat v. Nirmala Namdeo Wagh And Another adjudicated...
Applicability of Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act to MRTP Act Acquisitions: Comprehensive Analysis of Mehtab Laiq Ahmed Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

Applicability of Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act to MRTP Act Acquisitions: Comprehensive Analysis of Mehtab Laiq Ahmed Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Oct 14, 2017
Applicability of Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act to MRTP Act Acquisitions: Comprehensive Analysis of Mehtab Laiq Ahmed Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Mehtab Laiq Ahmed Shaikh And...
Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Arbitration Agreements under Section 11(6-A)

Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Arbitration Agreements under Section 11(6-A)

Date: Oct 13, 2017
Bombay High Court Establishes Strict Adherence to Arbitration Agreements under Section 11(6-A) Introduction The case of Vipin Bhimlal Shah v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority adjudicated by the Bombay...
Validity of Land Sale Transactions After Industrial Area Notifications under MID Act Upheld by Bombay High Court

Validity of Land Sale Transactions After Industrial Area Notifications under MID Act Upheld by Bombay High Court

Date: Sep 26, 2017
Validity of Land Sale Transactions After Industrial Area Notifications under MID Act Upheld by Bombay High Court Introduction The case of Shaikh Kalim Shaikh Mohammad and Another v. The State of...
High Court Upholds Pay Scale Compliance for Non-Teaching Staff in Amrutraj Pratapji Vyas v. Hind Seva Mandal

High Court Upholds Pay Scale Compliance for Non-Teaching Staff in Amrutraj Pratapji Vyas v. Hind Seva Mandal

Date: Sep 9, 2017
High Court Upholds Pay Scale Compliance for Non-Teaching Staff in Amrutraj Pratapji Vyas v. Hind Seva Mandal Introduction In the case of Amrutraj Pratapji Vyas v. Hind Seva Mandal, decided by the...
Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act

Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act

Date: Sep 7, 2017
Chandrashekhar S. Bhole v. Bhandari Co-Op. Bank Ltd.: Clarifying the Scope of 'Officer' under Section 88 of the MCS Act Introduction In the case of Chandrashekhar S. Bhole Petitioner v. Bhandari...
Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Aug 23, 2017
Enhancement of Due Process in Tax Penalty Imposition: Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Maharaj Garage & Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India

Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India

Date: Aug 17, 2017
Defining Untoward Incidents in Railway Compensation: Pushpa v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Pushpa v. Union Of India (Bombay High Court, 2017) centers on the plaintiffs' challenge against...
Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Aug 1, 2017
Defining Business Auxiliary Services as Exports: Insights from Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v. A.T.E. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-Vi v....
Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions

Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions

Date: Jul 27, 2017
Bombay High Court Upholds Plaint Against Axis Bank Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions Introduction The case of Padma Ashok Bhatt v. Orbit Corporation Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July...
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore

Date: Jun 30, 2017
Limits on Appellate Powers to Enhance Compensation in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Suresh Bhore Introduction The case of United India Insurance Co....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert