Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Establishing the Boundaries of "Permanent Structures" in Tenant Modifications: Insights from Somnath Krishnaji Gangal v. Moreshwar Krishnaji Kale And Others

Establishing the Boundaries of "Permanent Structures" in Tenant Modifications: Insights from Somnath Krishnaji Gangal v. Moreshwar Krishnaji Kale And Others

Date: Nov 11, 1994
Establishing the Boundaries of "Permanent Structures" in Tenant Modifications: Insights from Somnath Krishnaji Gangal v. Moreshwar Krishnaji Kale And Others Introduction The case of Somnath Krishnaji...
Determining "Investment Company" Status: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amritlal And Co. Ltd.

Determining "Investment Company" Status: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amritlal And Co. Ltd.

Date: Nov 10, 1994
Determining "Investment Company" Status: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amritlal And Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Amritlal And Co. Ltd. adjudicated by...
Clarification on the Application of Section 80G Ceiling Limits: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Shorrock Spg. And Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Clarification on the Application of Section 80G Ceiling Limits: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Shorrock Spg. And Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Date: Nov 9, 1994
Clarification on the Application of Section 80G Ceiling Limits: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Shorrock Spg. And Mfg. Co. Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New...
Family Members Cannot Claim License or Tenancy Rights Over Ancestral Property: Conrad Dias v Joseph Dias

Family Members Cannot Claim License or Tenancy Rights Over Ancestral Property: Conrad Dias v Joseph Dias

Date: Oct 27, 1994
Family Members Cannot Claim License or Tenancy Rights Over Ancestral Property: Conrad Dias v Joseph Dias Introduction The case of Conrad Dias, Dadar, Bombay v. Joseph Dias, Dadar, Bombay adjudicated...
Violation of Natural Justice in Disciplinary Enquiries: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. Ramnath Jagdish Tiwari

Violation of Natural Justice in Disciplinary Enquiries: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. Ramnath Jagdish Tiwari

Date: Oct 15, 1994
Violation of Natural Justice in Disciplinary Enquiries: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Ramnath Jagdish Tiwari Introduction The case of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Ramnath...
Strict Interpretation of Section 54: Continuous Use for Residence Required

Strict Interpretation of Section 54: Continuous Use for Residence Required

Date: Oct 9, 1994
Strict Interpretation of Section 54: Continuous Use for Residence Required Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sudhir Jayantilal Mulji adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Abbrogation and Discounting of Consideration under Section 269-UA: Analysis of Shrichand Raheja v. S.C Prasad

Abbrogation and Discounting of Consideration under Section 269-UA: Analysis of Shrichand Raheja v. S.C Prasad

Date: Sep 30, 1994
Abbrogation and Discounting of Consideration under Section 269-UA: Analysis of Shrichand Raheja And Others v. S.C Prasad And Others Introduction The case of Shrichand Raheja And Others v. S.C Prasad...
Clarification on Proviso Applicability under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra

Clarification on Proviso Applicability under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 17, 1994
Clarification on Proviso Applicability under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Bhujangrao Narayanrao Deshmukh v. State Of Maharashtra And Others Court: Bombay High Court...
State Retains Power to Acquire Land Under MRTP Act Section 126 Beyond Three Years: Bombay High Court Judgment

State Retains Power to Acquire Land Under MRTP Act Section 126 Beyond Three Years: Bombay High Court Judgment

Date: Sep 14, 1994
State Retains Power to Acquire Land Under MRTP Act Section 126 Beyond Three Years: Bombay High Court Judgment Introduction The case of Shashikant Sadashiv Bagwe v. State Of Maharashtra And Others was...
Reclassification of Culpable Homicide to Grievous Hurt: Shailesh v. State of Maharashtra

Reclassification of Culpable Homicide to Grievous Hurt: Shailesh v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Sep 14, 1994
Reclassification of Culpable Homicide to Grievous Hurt: Shailesh v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Shailesh alias Shailendra v. State of Maharashtra adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel v. Union Of India: Affirming the Revocation Powers under COFEPOSA Act

Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel v. Union Of India: Affirming the Revocation Powers under COFEPOSA Act

Date: Aug 27, 1994
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel v. Union Of India: Affirming the Revocation Powers under COFEPOSA Act Introduction The case of Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel v. Union Of India And Others adjudicated by...
Defining Cruelty under Section 498-A IPC: Insights from Sarojakshan Shankaran Nayar v. State of Maharashtra

Defining Cruelty under Section 498-A IPC: Insights from Sarojakshan Shankaran Nayar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Defining Cruelty under Section 498-A IPC: Insights from Sarojakshan Shankaran Nayar v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The landmark judgment in Sarojakshan Shankaran Nayar And Others v. State Of...
Collector Recognized as a Court Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Landmark Bombay High Court Decision

Collector Recognized as a Court Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Landmark Bombay High Court Decision

Date: Aug 13, 1994
Collector Recognized as a Court Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Landmark Bombay High Court Decision Introduction The case of Bhupal Premchand Shah and Others v. State of Maharashtra,...
Defining the Stage to Raise Preliminary Objections under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code

Defining the Stage to Raise Preliminary Objections under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code

Date: Aug 11, 1994
Defining the Stage to Raise Preliminary Objections under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code Introduction The case of P.R Sukeshwala And Another v. Dr. Devadatta V.S Kerkar And Another...
Expansion of High Court's Powers Under Article 226: Yeshwant Natthuji Meshram v. State of Maharashtra

Expansion of High Court's Powers Under Article 226: Yeshwant Natthuji Meshram v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Aug 9, 1994
Expansion of High Court's Powers Under Article 226: Yeshwant Natthuji Meshram v. State of Maharashtra Introduction The case of Yeshwant Natthuji Meshram v. State of Maharashtra And Others was...
Interpretation of Section 194-C in Transport Contracts: Bombay Goods Transport Association v. CBDT

Interpretation of Section 194-C in Transport Contracts: Bombay Goods Transport Association v. CBDT

Date: Jul 30, 1994
Interpretation of Section 194-C in Transport Contracts: Bombay Goods Transport Association v. Central Board of Direct Taxes 1. Introduction The case of Bombay Goods Transport Association and Another...
Ensuring Fair Market Value Assessment under Section 269-UD: Insights from Vimal Agarwal v. Appropriate Authority

Ensuring Fair Market Value Assessment under Section 269-UD: Insights from Vimal Agarwal v. Appropriate Authority

Date: Jul 28, 1994
Ensuring Fair Market Value Assessment under Section 269-UD: Insights from Vimal Agarwal v. Appropriate Authority Introduction The case of Vimal Agarwal v. Appropriate Authority Constituted Under The...
Jurisdiction of Co-operative Courts under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: Belganda Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Keshav Rajaram Patil

Jurisdiction of Co-operative Courts under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: Belganda Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Keshav Rajaram Patil

Date: Jul 28, 1994
Jurisdiction of Co-operative Courts under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: Belganda Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Keshav Rajaram Patil Introduction In the landmark case...
Chamber Of Income-Tax Consultants v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes: Clarifying the Scope of Section 194-C on Professional Fees

Chamber Of Income-Tax Consultants v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes: Clarifying the Scope of Section 194-C on Professional Fees

Date: Jul 15, 1994
Chamber Of Income-Tax Consultants v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes: Clarifying the Scope of Section 194-C on Professional Fees Introduction In the landmark case of Chamber Of Income-Tax Consultants...
Curable Disqualification in Cooperative Society Elections: Analysis of Ramesh Rajaram Patil v. Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division And Others

Curable Disqualification in Cooperative Society Elections: Analysis of Ramesh Rajaram Patil v. Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division And Others

Date: Jul 8, 1994
Curable Disqualification in Cooperative Society Elections: Analysis of Ramesh Rajaram Patil v. Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division And Others Introduction The case of Ramesh Rajaram Patil v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert