Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Judicial Discretion in Appointments: The Lal Singh v. Ghansham Singh Case

Judicial Discretion in Appointments: The Lal Singh v. Ghansham Singh Case

Date: May 12, 1887
Judicial Discretion in Appointments: The Lal Singh v. Ghansham Singh Case Introduction Lal Singh v. Ghansham Singh is a landmark case adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on May 11, 1887. The...
Clarifying Judicial Oversight in Jury Verdicts: Queen-Empress v. McCarthy

Clarifying Judicial Oversight in Jury Verdicts: Queen-Empress v. McCarthy

Date: Feb 8, 1887
Clarifying Judicial Oversight in Jury Verdicts: Queen-Empress v. McCarthy Introduction Queen-Empress v. McCarthy is a seminal case adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on February 7, 1887. The...
Res Judicata Does Not Bind Mortgagees in Absence of Privity: Analysis of Sita Ram v. Amir Begam (1886)

Res Judicata Does Not Bind Mortgagees in Absence of Privity: Analysis of Sita Ram v. Amir Begam (1886)

Date: May 6, 1886
Res Judicata Does Not Bind Mortgagees in Absence of Privity: Analysis of Sita Ram v. Amir Begam (1886) Introduction The case of Sita Ram v. Amir Begam adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on May...
Abdul Kadir v. Salima: Landmark Decision on Muhammadan Marital Rights and Dower Obligations

Abdul Kadir v. Salima: Landmark Decision on Muhammadan Marital Rights and Dower Obligations

Date: Jan 22, 1886
Abdul Kadir v. Salima: Landmark Decision on Muhammadan Marital Rights and Dower Obligations Introduction The case of Abdul Kadir v. Salima adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on January 21, 1886,...
Queen-Empress v. Ram Saran and Others: Landmark Ruling on Accomplice Testimony and Corroboration

Queen-Empress v. Ram Saran and Others: Landmark Ruling on Accomplice Testimony and Corroboration

Date: Nov 12, 1885
Queen-Empress v. Ram Saran and Others: Landmark Ruling on Accomplice Testimony and Corroboration Introduction The case of Queen-Empress v. Ram Saran and Others adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Doctrine of Invalid Adoption in Hindu Law and Its Impact on Property Succession: Sundar v. Parbati

Doctrine of Invalid Adoption in Hindu Law and Its Impact on Property Succession: Sundar v. Parbati

Date: Jun 13, 1885
Doctrine of Invalid Adoption in Hindu Law and Its Impact on Property Succession: Sundar v. Parbati Introduction Sundar v. Parbati is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on June...
Expanded Scope for Revisional Jurisdiction: Revising Orders under Section 407 of the Civil Procedure Code

Expanded Scope for Revisional Jurisdiction: Revising Orders under Section 407 of the Civil Procedure Code

Date: Apr 19, 1885
Expanded Scope for Revisional Jurisdiction: Revising Orders under Section 407 of the Civil Procedure Code Introduction The case of Chattarpal Singh v. Raja Ram adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Restrictive Scope of Second Appeals: The Precedent Set in Nivath Singh v. Bhikki Singh

Restrictive Scope of Second Appeals: The Precedent Set in Nivath Singh v. Bhikki Singh

Date: Apr 2, 1885
Restrictive Scope of Second Appeals: The Precedent Set in Nivath Singh v. Bhikki Singh Introduction The case of Nivath Singh v. Bhikki Singh, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on April 1, 1885,...
Recognition of Muhammadan Ecclesiastical Law in Criminal Offenses: Queen-Empress v. Ramzan And Others

Recognition of Muhammadan Ecclesiastical Law in Criminal Offenses: Queen-Empress v. Ramzan And Others

Date: Mar 8, 1885
Recognition of Muhammadan Ecclesiastical Law in Criminal Offenses: Queen-Empress v. Ramzan And Others Introduction The case Queen-Empress v. Ramzan And Others, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Establishing the Enforceability of Muhammadan Pre-emption Rights Against Non-Muhammadans under the Bengal Civil Courts Act, 1871

Establishing the Enforceability of Muhammadan Pre-emption Rights Against Non-Muhammadans under the Bengal Civil Courts Act, 1871

Date: Feb 10, 1885
Establishing the Enforceability of Muhammadan Pre-emption Rights Against Non-Muhammadans under the Bengal Civil Courts Act, 1871 Introduction The landmark case of Gobind Dayal v. Inayatullah,...
Defamation under Section 499 IPC: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Taki Husain

Defamation under Section 499 IPC: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Taki Husain

Date: Dec 7, 1884
Defamation under Section 499 IPC: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Taki Husain Introduction The landmark case of Queen-Empress v. Taki Husain, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on December 6,...
Admissibility of Police Confessions under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal And Another

Admissibility of Police Confessions under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal And Another

Date: Jun 28, 1884
Admissibility of Police Confessions under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act: Analysis of Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal And Another Introduction The case of Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal And Another...
Establishing Distinct Causes of Action in Property Disputes: Insights from Sarsuti v. Kunj Behari Lal

Establishing Distinct Causes of Action in Property Disputes: Insights from Sarsuti v. Kunj Behari Lal

Date: Feb 23, 1883
Establishing Distinct Causes of Action in Property Disputes: Insights from Sarsuti v. Kunj Behari Lal Introduction The case of Sarsuti v. Kunj Behari Lal, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Doctrine on Joinder of Causes of Action and Defendants in Civil Suits: Narsingh Das v. Mangal Dubey

Doctrine on Joinder of Causes of Action and Defendants in Civil Suits: Narsingh Das v. Mangal Dubey

Date: Aug 27, 1882
Doctrine on Joinder of Causes of Action and Defendants in Civil Suits: Narsingh Das v. Mangal Dubey Introduction Narsingh Das v. Mangal Dubey, decided by the Allahabad High Court on August 26, 1882,...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 304A: Intent and Knowledge in Culpable Homicide - Empress of India v. Idu Beg

Clarifying the Scope of Section 304A: Intent and Knowledge in Culpable Homicide - Empress of India v. Idu Beg

Date: Aug 13, 1881
Clarifying the Scope of Section 304A: Intent and Knowledge in Culpable Homicide Empress of India v. Idu Beg, Allahabad High Court, 1881 Introduction The case of Empress of India v. Idu Beg stands as...
Nanak Ram v. Mehin Lal: Establishing the Necessity of Consideration in Surety Agreements

Nanak Ram v. Mehin Lal: Establishing the Necessity of Consideration in Surety Agreements

Date: Apr 11, 1877
Nanak Ram v. Mehin Lal: Establishing the Necessity of Consideration in Surety Agreements Introduction Nanak Ram v. Mehin Lal is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on April 10,...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert