Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Benamidar’s Standing to Maintain a Suit: Insights from Yad Ram v. Umrao Singh

Benamidar’s Standing to Maintain a Suit: Insights from Yad Ram v. Umrao Singh

Date: May 17, 1899
Benamidar’s Standing to Maintain a Suit: Insights from Yad Ram v. Umrao Singh Introduction The case of Yad Ram v. Umrao Singh adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on May 16, 1899, delves into the...
Effect of Perfect Partition on Pre-emption Rights under Wajib-ul-Arz: Dalganjan Singh v. Kalka Singh

Effect of Perfect Partition on Pre-emption Rights under Wajib-ul-Arz: Dalganjan Singh v. Kalka Singh

Date: May 16, 1899
Effect of Perfect Partition on Pre-emption Rights under Wajib-ul-Arz: Dalganjan Singh v. Kalka Singh Introduction The case of Dalganjan Singh v. Kalka Singh was adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Res Judicata and Property Rights in Religious Estates: Insights from Parsotam Gir v. Narbada Gir

Res Judicata and Property Rights in Religious Estates: Insights from Parsotam Gir v. Narbada Gir

Date: Mar 25, 1899
Res Judicata and Property Rights in Religious Estates: Insights from Parsotam Gir v. Narbada Gir Introduction The case of Parsotam Gir v. Narbada Gir, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March...
Equitable Estoppel and Tenant's Rights in Beni Ram v. Kundan Lal

Equitable Estoppel and Tenant's Rights in Beni Ram v. Kundan Lal

Date: Mar 12, 1899
Equitable Estoppel and Tenant's Rights in Beni Ram And Anr. v. Kundan Lal And Ors. Introduction The case of Beni Ram And Anr. v. Kundan Lal And Ors. adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March...
Collateral Inheritance Exclusion for Illegitimate Sons Under Mitakshara Law

Collateral Inheritance Exclusion for Illegitimate Sons Under Mitakshara Law

Date: Aug 12, 1898
Collateral Inheritance Exclusion for Illegitimate Sons Under Mitakshara Law: Shome Shankar Rajendra Varere v. Rajesar Swami Jangam Introduction The case of Shome Shankar Rajendra Varere v. Rajesar...
Enforceability of Hypothecated Bonds Against Restricted Estates: Precedent from Sham Sundar Lal v. Achhan Kunwar

Enforceability of Hypothecated Bonds Against Restricted Estates: Precedent from Sham Sundar Lal v. Achhan Kunwar

Date: Jul 28, 1898
Enforceability of Hypothecated Bonds Against Restricted Estates: Precedent from Sham Sundar Lal v. Achhan Kunwar Introduction The case of Sham Sundar Lal And Ors. v. Achhan Kunwar And Anr.,...
Application of Article 134 Limitation in Suits Against Mortgagees: Establishing Precedent in Behari Lal v. Muhammad Muttaki

Application of Article 134 Limitation in Suits Against Mortgagees: Establishing Precedent in Behari Lal v. Muhammad Muttaki

Date: Jul 1, 1898
Application of Article 134 Limitation in Suits Against Mortgagees: Establishing Precedent in Behari Lal v. Muhammad Muttaki Introduction Behari Lal v. Muhammad Muttaki is a landmark judgment...
Confidentiality and Use of Police Diaries: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Mannu (1897)

Confidentiality and Use of Police Diaries: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Mannu (1897)

Date: Jul 14, 1897
Confidentiality and Use of Police Diaries: Insights from Queen-Empress v. Mannu (1897) Introduction The landmark case of Queen-Empress v. Mannu adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on July 13,...
Extension of Whole-Blood Succession Rights to Descendants under Mitakshara Law

Extension of Whole-Blood Succession Rights to Descendants under Mitakshara Law

Date: Dec 24, 1896
Extension of Whole-Blood Succession Rights to Descendants under Mitakshara Law Introduction The case of Suba Singh v. Sarafraz Kunwar adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on December 23, 1896,...
Maintenance Enforcement Post-Divorce and the Iddat Period: Insights from Shah Abu Ilyas v. Ulfat Bibi

Maintenance Enforcement Post-Divorce and the Iddat Period: Insights from Shah Abu Ilyas v. Ulfat Bibi

Date: Aug 15, 1896
Maintenance Enforcement Post-Divorce and the Iddat Period: Insights from Shah Abu Ilyas v. Ulfat Bibi Introduction The case of Shah Abu Ilyas v. Ulfat Bibi adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Presumption of Joint Hindu Family in Property Disputes: Analysis of Gajendar Singh v. Sardar Singh

Presumption of Joint Hindu Family in Property Disputes: Analysis of Gajendar Singh v. Sardar Singh

Date: Jan 10, 1896
Presumption of Joint Hindu Family in Property Disputes: Analysis of Gajendar Singh v. Sardar Singh Introduction The case of Gajendar Singh v. Sardar Singh adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Benami Transactions and Property Rights: Insights from Nand Kishore Lal v. Ahmad Ata

Benami Transactions and Property Rights: Insights from Nand Kishore Lal v. Ahmad Ata

Date: Aug 4, 1895
Benami Transactions and Property Rights: Insights from Nand Kishore Lal v. Ahmad Ata Introduction Nand Kishore Lal v. Ahmad Ata, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 3, 1895, addresses...
Kuar Sen v. Mamman: Establishing the Rigorous Standards for Proving Local Custom in Land Possession Cases

Kuar Sen v. Mamman: Establishing the Rigorous Standards for Proving Local Custom in Land Possession Cases

Date: Jan 11, 1895
Kuar Sen v. Mamman: Establishing the Rigorous Standards for Proving Local Custom in Land Possession Cases Introduction The case of Kuar Sen v. Mamman adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court in 1895...
Madho Das v. Ramji Patak: Jurisdictional Clarity in Appellate Decrees

Madho Das v. Ramji Patak: Jurisdictional Clarity in Appellate Decrees

Date: Apr 1, 1894
Madho Das v. Ramji Patak: Jurisdictional Clarity in Appellate Decrees Introduction The case of Madho Das v. Ramji Patak adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on March 31, 1894, addresses critical...
Murti v. Bhola Ram: Enforcing Section 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure to Prevent Multiple Actions on a Single Cause of Action

Murti v. Bhola Ram: Enforcing Section 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure to Prevent Multiple Actions on a Single Cause of Action

Date: Jun 4, 1893
Murti v. Bhola Ram: Enforcing Section 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure to Prevent Multiple Actions on a Single Cause of Action Introduction Murti v. Bhola Ram is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Interpretation of "Time Requisite for Obtaining a Copy" under Section 12 Limitation Act, 1877 – Bechi v. Ahsan-Ullah Khan

Interpretation of "Time Requisite for Obtaining a Copy" under Section 12 Limitation Act, 1877 – Bechi v. Ahsan-Ullah Khan

Date: Jun 15, 1890
Interpretation of "Time Requisite for Obtaining a Copy" under Section 12 Limitation Act, 1877 – Bechi v. Ahsan-Ullah Khan Introduction Bechi v. Ahsan-Ullah Khan is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Recognition of Widow's Maintenance as a Legal Obligation in Hindu Law - Janki v. Nand Ram

Recognition of Widow's Maintenance as a Legal Obligation in Hindu Law - Janki v. Nand Ram

Date: Dec 8, 1888
Recognition of Widow's Maintenance as a Legal Obligation in Hindu Law - Janki v. Nand Ram 1. Introduction Janki v. Nand Ram is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on December 7,...
The Doctrine of Attachment Before Judgment: Insights from Ram Chand v. Pitam Mal

The Doctrine of Attachment Before Judgment: Insights from Ram Chand v. Pitam Mal

Date: May 30, 1888
The Doctrine of Attachment Before Judgment: Insights from Ram Chand v. Pitam Mal Introduction The case of Ram Chand (Judgment-Debtor) v. Pitam Mal And Another (Decree-Holder) adjudicated by the...
Sakina Bibi v. Amiran: Reaffirming Pre-emption Rights and Judicial Appellate Procedures

Sakina Bibi v. Amiran: Reaffirming Pre-emption Rights and Judicial Appellate Procedures

Date: Apr 7, 1888
Sakina Bibi v. Amiran: Reaffirming Pre-emption Rights and Judicial Appellate Procedures Introduction Sakina Bibi v. Amiran, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on April 6, 1888, is a seminal case...
Queen-Empress v. Bisheshar And Others: Upholding Dual Convictions for Rioting and Grievous Hurt

Queen-Empress v. Bisheshar And Others: Upholding Dual Convictions for Rioting and Grievous Hurt

Date: May 17, 1887
Queen-Empress v. Bisheshar And Others: Upholding Dual Convictions for Rioting and Grievous Hurt Introduction The case of Queen-Empress v. Bisheshar And Others, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert