Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Mohi-Uddin v. Kashmiro Bibi: Application of Section 74 to Compromise Decrees

Mohi-Uddin v. Kashmiro Bibi: Application of Section 74 to Compromise Decrees

Date: Jan 11, 1933
Mohi-Uddin v. Kashmiro Bibi: Application of Section 74 to Compromise Decrees Introduction The case of Mohi-Uddin (Judgment-Debtor) v. Kashmiro Bibi (Decree-Holder) was adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Moolchand Motilal v. Ram Kishen: Clarifying Suit Valuation and Jurisdictional Boundaries

Moolchand Motilal v. Ram Kishen: Clarifying Suit Valuation and Jurisdictional Boundaries

Date: Jan 6, 1933
Moolchand Motilal v. Ram Kishen: Clarifying Suit Valuation and Jurisdictional Boundaries Introduction The case of Moolchand Motilal v. Ram Kishen adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on January 5,...
Curing Procedural Defects in Magistrate Orders under Section 145 CPC: The Precedent Set in Kapoor Chand v. Suraj Prasad

Curing Procedural Defects in Magistrate Orders under Section 145 CPC: The Precedent Set in Kapoor Chand v. Suraj Prasad

Date: Jan 5, 1933
Curing Procedural Defects in Magistrate Orders under Section 145 CPC: The Precedent Set in Kapoor Chand v. Suraj Prasad 1. Introduction The case of Kapoor Chand and Another v. Suraj Prasad,...
Establishing the Pious Obligation of Hindu Sons to Discharge Father's Debts

Establishing the Pious Obligation of Hindu Sons to Discharge Father's Debts

Date: Dec 24, 1932
Establishing the Pious Obligation of Hindu Sons to Discharge Father's Debts Introduction Lalta Prasad v. Gajadhar Shukul is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on December 23,...
Lakshmi Narain Rai v. Dip Narain Rai: Clarifying Court Fee Determination in Declaratory Petitions

Lakshmi Narain Rai v. Dip Narain Rai: Clarifying Court Fee Determination in Declaratory Petitions

Date: Dec 22, 1932
Lakshmi Narain Rai v. Dip Narain Rai: Clarifying Court Fee Determination in Declaratory Petitions 1. Introduction Lakshmi Narain Rai v. Dip Narain Rai is a landmark case decided by the Allahabad High...
Extending Inherent Judicial Powers: Restitution Beyond Section 144 in Amba Lal v. Ramgopal Madhoprasad

Extending Inherent Judicial Powers: Restitution Beyond Section 144 in Amba Lal v. Ramgopal Madhoprasad

Date: Dec 6, 1932
Extending Inherent Judicial Powers: Restitution Beyond Section 144 in Amba Lal v. Ramgopal Madhoprasad Introduction The case of Amba Lal (Objector) v. Ramgopal Madhoprasad (Decree-Holder),...
Bhola Umar v. Kausilla: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 2 of The Hindu Widows Remarriage Act, 1856

Bhola Umar v. Kausilla: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 2 of The Hindu Widows Remarriage Act, 1856

Date: Jul 9, 1932
Bhola Umar v. Kausilla: Clarifying the Applicability of Section 2 of The Hindu Widows Remarriage Act, 1856 Introduction Bhola Umar v. Kausilla is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High...
Lachman Singh v. Surendra Bahadur Singh: Refining Witness Requirements for Mortgage Deeds

Lachman Singh v. Surendra Bahadur Singh: Refining Witness Requirements for Mortgage Deeds

Date: Jun 22, 1932
Lachman Singh v. Surendra Bahadur Singh: Refining Witness Requirements for Mortgage Deeds Introduction The case of Lachman Singh v. Surendra Bahadur Singh, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Subrogation of Third Mortgagees under the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Tota Ram v. Ram Lal

Subrogation of Third Mortgagees under the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Tota Ram v. Ram Lal

Date: May 26, 1932
Subrogation of Third Mortgagees under the Transfer of Property Act: Insights from Tota Ram v. Ram Lal Introduction The landmark case of Tota Ram v. Ram Lal, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Distinction Between Declaratory and Substantive Reliefs in Instrument Cancellation: Kalu Ram v. Babu Lal

Distinction Between Declaratory and Substantive Reliefs in Instrument Cancellation: Kalu Ram v. Babu Lal

Date: Apr 23, 1932
Distinction Between Declaratory and Substantive Reliefs in Instrument Cancellation: Kalu Ram v. Babu Lal Introduction The case of Kalu Ram v. Babu Lal (Allahabad High Court, 1932) addresses critical...
Adverse Possession in Co-Ownership and Usufructuary Mortgage: Subah Lal v. Fateh Muhammad

Adverse Possession in Co-Ownership and Usufructuary Mortgage: Subah Lal v. Fateh Muhammad

Date: Mar 2, 1932
Adverse Possession in Co-Ownership and Usufructuary Mortgage: Subah Lal v. Fateh Muhammad Introduction The landmark case of Subah Lal v. Fateh Muhammad adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court in...
Res Judicata and Guardian Negligence in Partition Suits: Commentary on Siraj Fatma v. Mahmud Ali

Res Judicata and Guardian Negligence in Partition Suits: Commentary on Siraj Fatma v. Mahmud Ali

Date: Feb 28, 1932
Res Judicata and Guardian Negligence in Partition Suits: Commentary on Siraj Fatma v. Mahmud Ali 1. Introduction Case: Siraj Fatma v. Mahmud Ali Court: Allahabad High Court Date: February 27, 1932...
Gobardhan Das v. Dau Dayal: Landmark Judgment on Execution Proceedings and Limitation Laws

Gobardhan Das v. Dau Dayal: Landmark Judgment on Execution Proceedings and Limitation Laws

Date: Feb 4, 1932
Gobardhan Das v. Dau Dayal: Landmark Judgment on Execution Proceedings and Limitation Laws Introduction The case of Gobardhan Das (Judgment-Debtor) v. Dau Dayal (Decree-Holder) is a seminal judgment...
Ram Singh v. Baldeo Prasad: Res Judicata and Estoppel in Mortgage Redemption under Tenancy Law

Ram Singh v. Baldeo Prasad: Res Judicata and Estoppel in Mortgage Redemption under Tenancy Law

Date: Jan 13, 1932
Ram Singh v. Baldeo Prasad: Res Judicata and Estoppel in Mortgage Redemption under Tenancy Law Introduction Ram Singh v. Baldeo Prasad is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Ensuring Fair Trial: Key Principles from Bashiruddin v. Emperor (1931)

Ensuring Fair Trial: Key Principles from Bashiruddin v. Emperor (1931)

Date: Oct 14, 1931
Ensuring Fair Trial: Key Principles from Bashiruddin v. Emperor (1931) Introduction The case of Bashiruddin v. Emperor was adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on October 13, 1931. This landmark...
Non-Retroactive Application of Section 99, Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 to Pre-Existing Ejectments

Non-Retroactive Application of Section 99, Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 to Pre-Existing Ejectments

Date: Aug 5, 1931
Non-Retroactive Application of Section 99, Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 to Pre-Existing Ejectments Introduction The case of Ram Karan Singh v. Ram Das, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 4,...
Exoneration of Attaching Officers under Rule 122: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakir Husain v. Chandu Lal

Exoneration of Attaching Officers under Rule 122: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakir Husain v. Chandu Lal

Date: Jul 23, 1931
Exoneration of Attaching Officers under Rule 122: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shakir Husain v. Chandu Lal Introduction The case of Shakir Husain v. Chandu Lal, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh: Clarification on Substituted Service and Security Bond Compliance in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees

Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh: Clarification on Substituted Service and Security Bond Compliance in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees

Date: Jul 10, 1931
Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh: Clarification on Substituted Service and Security Bond Compliance in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees Introduction Ram Bharose v. Ganga Singh is a landmark judgment...
Moti Chand v. British India Corporation Ltd.: Establishing the Indefeasibility of Mortgagee's Title Against Successors

Moti Chand v. British India Corporation Ltd.: Establishing the Indefeasibility of Mortgagee's Title Against Successors

Date: Jul 1, 1931
Moti Chand v. British India Corporation Ltd.: Establishing the Indefeasibility of Mortgagee's Title Against Successors Introduction Moti Chand v. British India Corporation Ltd. is a landmark judgment...
Judicial Discretion in Bail Applications: Emperor v. Joglekar And Others

Judicial Discretion in Bail Applications: Emperor v. Joglekar And Others

Date: Jun 27, 1931
Judicial Discretion in Bail Applications: Emperor v. Joglekar And Others Introduction Emperor v. Joglekar And Others is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on June 26, 1931. The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert