Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

High Court's Revisory Jurisdiction Restricted in Extradition Warrant Execution: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sandal Singh v. DM Dehra Dun

High Court's Revisory Jurisdiction Restricted in Extradition Warrant Execution: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sandal Singh v. DM Dehra Dun

Date: Oct 27, 1933
High Court's Revisory Jurisdiction Restricted in Extradition Warrant Execution: Allahabad High Court's Decision in Sandal Singh v. DM Dehra Dun Introduction The case of Sandal Singh v. District...
Attachment Before Judgment: Principles Established in Dular Singh v. Ram Chander

Attachment Before Judgment: Principles Established in Dular Singh v. Ram Chander

Date: Sep 23, 1933
Attachment Before Judgment: Principles Established in Dular Singh v. Ram Chander Introduction The case of Dular Singh v. Ram Chander adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on September 22, 1933,...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Forensic Evidence: Commentary on Emperor v. Happu

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Forensic Evidence: Commentary on Emperor v. Happu

Date: Aug 30, 1933
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Forensic Evidence: Commentary on Emperor v. Happu 1. Introduction The case of Emperor v. Happu adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 29, 1933, serves...
Shailabala Devi v. Emperor: Defining Third-Party Locus Standi in Criminal Revision Petitions

Shailabala Devi v. Emperor: Defining Third-Party Locus Standi in Criminal Revision Petitions

Date: Aug 19, 1933
Shailabala Devi v. Emperor: Defining Third-Party Locus Standi in Criminal Revision Petitions Introduction The case of Shailabala Devi v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on August 18,...
Binding Decrees through Third-Party Statements: Insights from Akbari Begam v. Rahmat Husain

Binding Decrees through Third-Party Statements: Insights from Akbari Begam v. Rahmat Husain

Date: Aug 15, 1933
Binding Decrees through Third-Party Statements: Insights from Akbari Begam v. Rahmat Husain Introduction The landmark case of Akbari Begam v. Rahmat Husain adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
S.H Jhabwala And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party: Clarifying Magistrate's Discretion in Criminal Conspiracy Cases

S.H Jhabwala And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party: Clarifying Magistrate's Discretion in Criminal Conspiracy Cases

Date: Aug 4, 1933
S.H Jhabwala And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party: Clarifying Magistrate's Discretion in Criminal Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of S.H Jhabwala And Others Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party...
Obstruction of Public Servant: Precedents and Legal Reasoning in Emperor v. Tohfa And Others

Obstruction of Public Servant: Precedents and Legal Reasoning in Emperor v. Tohfa And Others

Date: Aug 2, 1933
Obstruction of Public Servant: Precedents and Legal Reasoning in Emperor v. Tohfa And Others Introduction Emperor v. Tohfa And Others is a landmark judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Legal Commentary on Emperor v. Bans Gopal: Jurisprudence on Expiring Ordinances and Continuance of Trials

Legal Commentary on Emperor v. Bans Gopal: Jurisprudence on Expiring Ordinances and Continuance of Trials

Date: Jul 21, 1933
Legal Commentary on Emperor v. Bans Gopal: Jurisprudence on Expiring Ordinances and Continuance of Trials Introduction The case of Emperor v. Bans Gopal adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Legal Commentary: Shiam Lal Diwan v. Official Liquidator, Allahabad High Court (1933) – Interpretation of Section 235 and Limitation Periods

Legal Commentary: Shiam Lal Diwan v. Official Liquidator, Allahabad High Court (1933) – Interpretation of Section 235 and Limitation Periods

Date: Jul 20, 1933
Legal Commentary: Shiam Lal Diwan v. Official Liquidator, Allahabad High Court (1933) – Interpretation of Section 235 and Limitation Periods Introduction Shiam Lal Diwan v. Official Liquidator, U.P....
Apportionment of Compensation Between Zamindar and Occupancy Tenants in Land Acquisition

Apportionment of Compensation Between Zamindar and Occupancy Tenants in Land Acquisition

Date: Jul 20, 1933
Apportionment of Compensation Between Zamindar and Occupancy Tenants in Land Acquisition Introduction The case of Shiam Lal v. Collector Of Agra, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on July 19,...
Substitution of Parties in Representative Suits: Insights from Jaimala Kunwar v. Collector Of Saharanpur

Substitution of Parties in Representative Suits: Insights from Jaimala Kunwar v. Collector Of Saharanpur

Date: May 3, 1933
Substitution of Parties in Representative Suits: Insights from Jaimala Kunwar v. Collector Of Saharanpur Introduction The case of Jaimala Kunwar v. Collector Of Saharanpur adjudicated by the...
Determining Court Fees for Declaratory and Substantive Relief: Insights from Sri Krishna Chandra v. Mahabir Prasad

Determining Court Fees for Declaratory and Substantive Relief: Insights from Sri Krishna Chandra v. Mahabir Prasad

Date: Apr 28, 1933
Determining Court Fees for Declaratory and Substantive Relief: Insights from Sri Krishna Chandra v. Mahabir Prasad Introduction The case of Sri Krishna Chandra v. Mahabir Prasad adjudicated by the...
Incorporation of Unregistered Compromises into Civil Decrees: Jurisdiction Affirmed in Sahu Shyam Lal v. Shyam Lal

Incorporation of Unregistered Compromises into Civil Decrees: Jurisdiction Affirmed in Sahu Shyam Lal v. Shyam Lal

Date: Apr 27, 1933
Incorporation of Unregistered Compromises into Civil Decrees: Jurisdiction Affirmed in Sahu Shyam Lal v. Shyam Lal Introduction The case of Sahu Shyam Lal v. Shyam Lal, adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Restitution of Conjugal Rights and Dower Obligations: Anis Begam v. Muhammad Istafa Wali Khan (1933)

Restitution of Conjugal Rights and Dower Obligations: Anis Begam v. Muhammad Istafa Wali Khan (1933)

Date: Apr 26, 1933
Restitution of Conjugal Rights and Dower Obligations: Anis Begam v. Muhammad Istafa Wali Khan (1933) Introduction The case of Anis Begam v. Muhammad Istafa Wali Khan, adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Continuation of Suits Under Section 92 CPC Post Death of a Plaintiff: Insights from Ram Ghulam v. Shyam Sarup

Continuation of Suits Under Section 92 CPC Post Death of a Plaintiff: Insights from Ram Ghulam v. Shyam Sarup

Date: Apr 20, 1933
Continuation of Suits Under Section 92 CPC Post Death of a Plaintiff: Insights from Ram Ghulam v. Shyam Sarup Introduction Ram Ghulam v. Shyam Sarup is a significant judgment delivered by the...
Emperor v. Chaube Dinkar Rao And Others: Defining Abetment in Bribery Under IPC

Emperor v. Chaube Dinkar Rao And Others: Defining Abetment in Bribery Under IPC

Date: Apr 12, 1933
Emperor v. Chaube Dinkar Rao And Others: Defining Abetment in Bribery Under IPC Introduction The case of Emperor v. Chaube Dinkar Rao And Others adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on April 11,...
Emperor v. Ujagar And Others: Reinforcing the Standard of Proof in Communal Riot Cases

Emperor v. Ujagar And Others: Reinforcing the Standard of Proof in Communal Riot Cases

Date: Apr 6, 1933
Emperor v. Ujagar And Others: Reinforcing the Standard of Proof in Communal Riot Cases 1. Introduction Emperor v. Ujagar And Others is a seminal judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Liability of Railway Administration Under Risk-Note B: Insights from Secretary Of State For India In Council v. Madhuri Das Narain Das

Liability of Railway Administration Under Risk-Note B: Insights from Secretary Of State For India In Council v. Madhuri Das Narain Das

Date: Mar 31, 1933
Liability of Railway Administration Under Risk-Note B: Insights from Secretary Of State For India In Council v. Madhuri Das Narain Das Introduction The case of Secretary Of State For India In Council...
Muhammad Qamar Shah Khan v. Muhammad Salamat Ali Khan: Recognition of Mutwallis as Cosharers under the Agra Tenancy Act

Muhammad Qamar Shah Khan v. Muhammad Salamat Ali Khan: Recognition of Mutwallis as Cosharers under the Agra Tenancy Act

Date: Mar 1, 1933
Muhammad Qamar Shah Khan v. Muhammad Salamat Ali Khan: Recognition of Mutwallis as Cosharers under the Agra Tenancy Act Introduction The case of Muhammad Qamar Shah Khan v. Muhammad Salamat Ali Khan,...
Evidentiary Standards in Poisoning Cases: Mt. Gajrani v. Emperor Opposite Party (1933)

Evidentiary Standards in Poisoning Cases: Mt. Gajrani v. Emperor Opposite Party (1933)

Date: Feb 3, 1933
Evidentiary Standards in Poisoning Cases: Mt. Gajrani v. Emperor Opposite Party (1933) Introduction The case of Mt. Gajrani and Another v. Emperor Opposite Party was adjudicated by the Allahabad High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert