Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Allahabad High Court Case Commentaries

Preference for Specialized Legislation in Minor Custody Cases: Mt. Haidari Begum v. Jawad Ali

Preference for Specialized Legislation in Minor Custody Cases: Mt. Haidari Begum v. Jawad Ali

Date: Sep 21, 1934
Preference for Specialized Legislation in Minor Custody Cases: Mt. Haidari Begum v. Jawad Ali Introduction The case of Mt. Haidari Begum v. Jawad Ali was adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Recognition of Time-Barred Debts Through Unconditional Acknowledgments in Ghulam Murtaza v. Fasih-Un-Nissa Bibi

Recognition of Time-Barred Debts Through Unconditional Acknowledgments in Ghulam Murtaza v. Fasih-Un-Nissa Bibi

Date: Aug 29, 1934
Recognition of Time-Barred Debts Through Unconditional Acknowledgments in Ghulam Murtaza v. Fasih-Un-Nissa Bibi Introduction The case of Ghulam Murtaza v. Fasih-Un-Nissa Bibi adjudicated by the...
Application of Article 142 of the Limitation Act in Co-ownership Disputes: Bindhyachal Chand v. Ram Gharib Chand (1934)

Application of Article 142 of the Limitation Act in Co-ownership Disputes: Bindhyachal Chand v. Ram Gharib Chand (1934)

Date: May 4, 1934
Application of Article 142 of the Limitation Act in Co-ownership Disputes: Bindhyachal Chand v. Ram Gharib Chand (1934) Introduction The case of Bindhyachal Chand v. Ram Gharib Chand, adjudicated by...
Recognizing Burial Rights as Easements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sheo Raj Chamar v. Mudeer Khan

Recognizing Burial Rights as Easements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sheo Raj Chamar v. Mudeer Khan

Date: Mar 13, 1934
Recognizing Burial Rights as Easements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Sheo Raj Chamar v. Mudeer Khan 1. Introduction The landmark case of Sheo Raj Chamar v. Mudeer Khan, adjudicated by the Allahabad...
Article 75 Limitation Act Applicability in Instalment Bonds: Insights from Jawahar Lal v. Mathura Prasad

Article 75 Limitation Act Applicability in Instalment Bonds: Insights from Jawahar Lal v. Mathura Prasad

Date: Mar 8, 1934
Article 75 Limitation Act Applicability in Instalment Bonds: Insights from Jawahar Lal v. Mathura Prasad Introduction The case of Jawahar Lal v. Mathura Prasad adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court...
Reconciling Restitution and Execution: Insights from Parmeshwar Singh v. Sitaldin Dube

Reconciling Restitution and Execution: Insights from Parmeshwar Singh v. Sitaldin Dube

Date: Feb 23, 1934
Reconciling Restitution and Execution: Insights from Parmeshwar Singh v. Sitaldin Dube Introduction The case of Parmeshwar Singh v. Sitaldin Dube adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on February...
Defining 'Case' under Section 115 C.P.C.: Insights from Gupta & Co. v. Kripa Ram Brothers

Defining 'Case' under Section 115 C.P.C.: Insights from Gupta & Co. v. Kripa Ram Brothers

Date: Feb 20, 1934
Defining 'Case' under Section 115 C.P.C.: Insights from Gupta & Co. v. Kripa Ram Brothers Introduction Gupta & Co. v. Kripa Ram Brothers is a seminal judgment delivered by the Allahabad High Court on...
Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 179, Criminal Procedure Code in Misappropriation Cases: Emperor v. Kashi Ram Mehta

Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 179, Criminal Procedure Code in Misappropriation Cases: Emperor v. Kashi Ram Mehta

Date: Feb 9, 1934
Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 179, Criminal Procedure Code in Misappropriation Cases: Emperor v. Kashi Ram Mehta Introduction Emperor v. Kashi Ram Mehta is a landmark judgment delivered...
Interpretation of "Registered Proprietor" in Design Registration: Insights from Muhammad Abdul Karim v. Muhammad

Interpretation of "Registered Proprietor" in Design Registration: Insights from Muhammad Abdul Karim v. Muhammad

Date: Feb 8, 1934
Interpretation of "Registered Proprietor" in Design Registration: Insights from Muhammad Abdul Karim v. Muhammad Introduction The case of Muhammad Abdul Karim v. Muhammad was adjudicated by the...
Irrevocability of Licenses with Permanent Structures: Insights from Mathuri v. Bhola Nath

Irrevocability of Licenses with Permanent Structures: Insights from Mathuri v. Bhola Nath

Date: Jan 23, 1934
Irrevocability of Licenses with Permanent Structures: Insights from Mathuri v. Bhola Nath Introduction The case of Mathuri v. Bhola Nath, adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on January 22, 1934,...
Limitations on Appeals for Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4): An Analysis of Jot Ram Sher Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Limitations on Appeals for Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4): An Analysis of Jot Ram Sher Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Jan 12, 1934
Limitations on Appeals for Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4): An Analysis of Jot Ram Sher Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Jot Ram Sher Singh v. Commissioner...
Time-Barred Execution Applications in Instalment Decrees: Insights from Ram Prasad Ram v. Jadunandan Upadhia

Time-Barred Execution Applications in Instalment Decrees: Insights from Ram Prasad Ram v. Jadunandan Upadhia

Date: Jan 11, 1934
Time-Barred Execution Applications in Instalment Decrees: Insights from Ram Prasad Ram and Another v. Jadunandan Upadhia 1. Introduction The case of Ram Prasad Ram and Another (Judgment-Debtors) v....
Establishing Jurisdiction Over Corporate Entities and Waiver of Sovereign Privileges: Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Habib Ullah

Establishing Jurisdiction Over Corporate Entities and Waiver of Sovereign Privileges: Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Habib Ullah

Date: Dec 23, 1933
Establishing Jurisdiction Over Corporate Entities and Waiver of Sovereign Privileges: Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Habib Ullah Introduction Gaekwar Baroda State Railway v. Habib Ullah is a...
Continuation vs. Fresh Application in Execution Proceedings: Shiva Shankar Das v. Yusuf Hasan

Continuation vs. Fresh Application in Execution Proceedings: Shiva Shankar Das v. Yusuf Hasan

Date: Dec 23, 1933
Continuation vs. Fresh Application in Execution Proceedings: Shiva Shankar Das And Others v. Yusuf Hasan Introduction The case of Shiva Shankar Das And Others (Decree-Holders) v. Yusuf Hasan...
Enforceability of Security Bonds and Burden of Proof in Contract Breach Cases: Naima Khatun v. Sardar Basant Singh (1933)

Enforceability of Security Bonds and Burden of Proof in Contract Breach Cases: Naima Khatun v. Sardar Basant Singh (1933)

Date: Dec 20, 1933
Enforceability of Security Bonds and Burden of Proof in Contract Breach Cases: Naima Khatun v. Sardar Basant Singh (1933) Introduction The case of Naima Khatun v. Sardar Basant Singh adjudicated by...
Narain Das v. Bhagwati Prasad: Establishing Procedural Clarity in Mesne Profits Determination

Narain Das v. Bhagwati Prasad: Establishing Procedural Clarity in Mesne Profits Determination

Date: Dec 6, 1933
Narain Das v. Bhagwati Prasad: Establishing Procedural Clarity in Mesne Profits Determination Introduction The case of Narain Das v. Bhagwati Prasad, decided by the Allahabad High Court on December...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Makhan Lal v. Secretary Of State For India In Council

Jurisdictional Clarity in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Makhan Lal v. Secretary Of State For India In Council

Date: Nov 24, 1933
Jurisdictional Clarity in Land Acquisition: Analysis of Makhan Lal v. Secretary Of State For India In Council Introduction The landmark case of Makhan Lal v. Secretary Of State For India In Council...
Implied Acceptance of Rent Increase through Non-Vacation: Madan Mohan Garg v. Bohra Ram Lal

Implied Acceptance of Rent Increase through Non-Vacation: Madan Mohan Garg v. Bohra Ram Lal

Date: Nov 14, 1933
Implied Acceptance of Rent Increase through Non-Vacation: Madan Mohan Garg v. Bohra Ram Lal Introduction The case of Madan Mohan Garg v. Bohra Ram Lal was adjudicated by the Allahabad High Court on...
Biradhmal Lodha v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Applicability of Section 25A in Partial Partition of Joint Family Property

Biradhmal Lodha v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Applicability of Section 25A in Partial Partition of Joint Family Property

Date: Nov 4, 1933
Biradhmal Lodha v. Commissioner of Income-Tax: Landmark Ruling on Applicability of Section 25A in Partial Partition of Joint Family Property Introduction The case of Biradhmal Lodha v. Commissioner...
Clarifying Judicial Jurisdiction and the Legal Definition of Idiocy in Matrimonial Nullity: Titli v. Jones, Allahabad High Court (1933)

Clarifying Judicial Jurisdiction and the Legal Definition of Idiocy in Matrimonial Nullity: Titli v. Jones, Allahabad High Court (1933)

Date: Oct 31, 1933
Clarifying Judicial Jurisdiction and the Legal Definition of Idiocy in Matrimonial Nullity: Titli v. Jones, Allahabad High Court (1933) Introduction The case of Titeli Alias Tereza v. Alfred Robert...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert