Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

Madan Theatres Ltd. v. Dinshaw And Co. - Affirmation of Debtor's Rights to Adjustments Post-Preliminary Decree

Madan Theatres Ltd. v. Dinshaw And Co. - Affirmation of Debtor's Rights to Adjustments Post-Preliminary Decree

Date: Jul 19, 1945
Affirmation of Debtor's Rights to Adjustments Post-Preliminary Decree Introduction The case of Madan Theatres Ltd. v. Dinshaw And Co., Bankers Ltd., Through Official Liquidator is a landmark decision...
Privy Council Upholds Rule 26 of Defence of India Act in Detention Orders

Privy Council Upholds Rule 26 of Defence of India Act in Detention Orders

Date: Jul 18, 1945
Privy Council Upholds Rule 26 of Defence of India Act in Detention Orders Introduction The landmark case Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji And Others adjudicated by the Privy Council on July 17, 1945,...
Strict Admissibility Standards under Section 33 of the Evidence Act: Chainchal Singh v. Emperor

Strict Admissibility Standards under Section 33 of the Evidence Act: Chainchal Singh v. Emperor

Date: Jul 4, 1945
Strict Admissibility Standards under Section 33 of the Evidence Act: Chainchal Singh v. Emperor Introduction The case of Chainchal Singh v. Emperor adjudicated by the Privy Council on July 3, 1945,...
Malak Khan v. Emperor (1945): Corroborative Evidence in Murder Conviction

Malak Khan v. Emperor (1945): Corroborative Evidence in Murder Conviction

Date: Jul 4, 1945
Malak Khan v. Emperor (1945): Corroborative Evidence in Murder Conviction Introduction Malak Khan v. Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the Privy Council on July 3, 1945. The case centers...
Parashuram Detaram Shamdasani v. Emperor: Redefining Contempt of Court in Advocacy

Parashuram Detaram Shamdasani v. Emperor: Redefining Contempt of Court in Advocacy

Date: May 30, 1945
Parashuram Detaram Shamdasani v. Emperor: Redefining Contempt of Court in Advocacy Introduction Parashuram Detaram Shamdasani v. Emperor is a landmark case adjudicated by the Privy Council on May 29,...
Personal Liability in Surety Bonds: Privy Council's Ruling in Kesar Chand v. Uttam Chand

Personal Liability in Surety Bonds: Privy Council's Ruling in Kesar Chand v. Uttam Chand

Date: May 1, 1945
Personal Liability in Surety Bonds: Privy Council's Ruling in Kesar Chand v. Uttam Chand Introduction The case of Kesar Chand and Others v. Uttam Chand and Others was adjudicated by the Privy Council...
Protection of Bona Fide Assignees Under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940

Protection of Bona Fide Assignees Under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940

Date: Mar 8, 1945
Protection of Bona Fide Assignees Under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940 Introduction The case of Srimati Renula Bose v. Rai Manmatha Nath Bose And Others adjudicated by the Privy Council on March...
Manindra Chandra Lala v. Mahaluxmi Bank Limited: Establishing Standards for Probate Validation

Manindra Chandra Lala v. Mahaluxmi Bank Limited: Establishing Standards for Probate Validation

Date: Feb 6, 1945
Manindra Chandra Lala v. Mahaluxmi Bank Limited: Establishing Standards for Probate Validation Introduction The case of Manindra Chandra Lala v. Mahaluxmi Bank Limited adjudicated by the Privy...
Authority of High Courts to Grant Bail Pending Special Appeals: Analysis of Lola Jairam Das and Others v. Emperor

Authority of High Courts to Grant Bail Pending Special Appeals: Analysis of Lola Jairam Das and Others v. Emperor

Date: Feb 6, 1945
Authority of High Courts to Grant Bail Pending Special Appeals: Analysis of Lola Jairam Das and Others v. Emperor Introduction Case: Lola Jairam Das and Others v. Emperor Court: Privy Council Date:...
Clarifying 'Common Intention' Under IPC Section 34: Insights from Mahbub Shah v. Emperor

Clarifying 'Common Intention' Under IPC Section 34: Insights from Mahbub Shah v. Emperor

Date: Feb 1, 1945
Clarifying 'Common Intention' Under IPC Section 34: Insights from Mahbub Shah v. Emperor Introduction Mahbub Shah v. Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the Privy Council on January 31, 1945....
Governor-General In Council v. Province Of Madras: Clarifying Legislative Jurisdiction Over Sales Taxes

Governor-General In Council v. Province Of Madras: Clarifying Legislative Jurisdiction Over Sales Taxes

Date: Jan 22, 1945
Governor-General In Council v. Province Of Madras: Clarifying Legislative Jurisdiction Over Sales Taxes 1. Introduction The case of Governor-General In Council v. Province Of Madras is a landmark...
Validity of Certificates under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act: Insights from Doorga Prosad Chamaria v. Secretary Of State

Validity of Certificates under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act: Insights from Doorga Prosad Chamaria v. Secretary Of State

Date: Jan 19, 1945
Validity of Certificates under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act: Insights from Doorga Prosad Chamaria v. Secretary Of State Introduction The case of Doorga Prosad Chamaria v. Secretary Of State...
Limits of the Doctrine of Frustration: Twentsche Overseas Trading Co. Ltd. v. Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd.

Limits of the Doctrine of Frustration: Twentsche Overseas Trading Co. Ltd. v. Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd.

Date: Dec 21, 1944
Limits of the Doctrine of Frustration: Twentsche Overseas Trading Co. Ltd. v. Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd. Introduction Twentsche Overseas Trading Co. Ltd. v. Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd. is a seminal case...
Ensuring the Integrity of Court-Proclaimed Sales: Insights from Marudanayagam Pillai v. Manickavasakam Chettiar

Ensuring the Integrity of Court-Proclaimed Sales: Insights from Marudanayagam Pillai v. Manickavasakam Chettiar

Date: Dec 19, 1944
Ensuring the Integrity of Court-Proclaimed Sales: Insights from Marudanayagam Pillai v. Manickavasakam Chettiar Introduction The case of Marudanayagam Pillai v. Manickavasakam Chettiar, adjudicated...
Transportation for Life as Equivalent to Life Imprisonment under Indian Penal Code: Insights from Kishori Lal v. Emperor

Transportation for Life as Equivalent to Life Imprisonment under Indian Penal Code: Insights from Kishori Lal v. Emperor

Date: Dec 7, 1944
Transportation for Life as Equivalent to Life Imprisonment under Indian Penal Code: Insights from Kishori Lal v. Emperor Introduction Kishori Lal v. Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Limitation Period in Voidable Gift Transactions: Insights from Rarnchandra Jivaji Kanagoand v. Laxman Shrinivas Naik

Limitation Period in Voidable Gift Transactions: Insights from Rarnchandra Jivaji Kanagoand v. Laxman Shrinivas Naik

Date: Dec 5, 1944
Limitation Period in Voidable Gift Transactions: Insights from Rarnchandra Jivaji Kanagoand v. Laxman Shrinivas Naik Introduction The case of Rarnchandra Jivaji Kanagoand Another v. Laxman Shrinivas...
Authority of the Governor-General in Emergencies: Insights from Emperor v. Benoari Lal Sarma And Others

Authority of the Governor-General in Emergencies: Insights from Emperor v. Benoari Lal Sarma And Others

Date: Nov 7, 1944
Authority of the Governor-General in Emergencies: Insights from Emperor v. Benoari Lal Sarma And Others Introduction Emperor v. Benoari Lal Sarma And Others is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Lala Man Mohan Das v. Janki Prasad: Affirming Joint Authority in Trust Mortgages and Restricting Subrogation Rights

Lala Man Mohan Das v. Janki Prasad: Affirming Joint Authority in Trust Mortgages and Restricting Subrogation Rights

Date: Oct 18, 1944
Lala Man Mohan Das v. Janki Prasad: Affirming Joint Authority in Trust Mortgages and Restricting Subrogation Rights Introduction The case of Lala Man Mohan Das v. Janki Prasad And Others adjudicated...
Preservation of Police Investigative Powers: Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad

Preservation of Police Investigative Powers: Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad

Date: Oct 18, 1944
Preservation of Police Investigative Powers: Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad Introduction Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Privy Council on October 17, 1944. This case...
Extending Mortgage Liability to Joint Family Estate: Shri 108 Puja Pad Udit Panch Parmeshwar Panchaiti Akhara Udasi Nirwani v. Surajpal Singh

Extending Mortgage Liability to Joint Family Estate: Shri 108 Puja Pad Udit Panch Parmeshwar Panchaiti Akhara Udasi Nirwani v. Surajpal Singh

Date: Jul 28, 1944
Extending Mortgage Liability to Joint Family Estate: Shri 108 Puja Pad Udit Panch Parmeshwar Panchaiti Akhara Udasi Nirwani v. Surajpal Singh Introduction The case of Shri 108 Puja Pad Udit Panch...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert