Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All Tribunals Case Commentaries

Establishing Maintenance Charges on Partitioned Property: Dan Kuer v. Sarla Devi

Establishing Maintenance Charges on Partitioned Property: Dan Kuer v. Sarla Devi

Date: Jul 25, 1946
Establishing Maintenance Charges on Partitioned Property: Dan Kuer v. Sarla Devi Introduction The case of Dan Kuer v. Sarla Devi adjudicated by the Privy Council on July 24, 1946, serves as a pivotal...
Lala Duni Chand v. Mt. Anar Kali: Redefining Hindu Succession Law

Lala Duni Chand v. Mt. Anar Kali: Redefining Hindu Succession Law

Date: Jul 10, 1946
Lala Duni Chand And Others v. Mt. Anar Kali And Others: Advancements in Hindu Succession Law Introduction The case of Lala Duni Chand And Others v. Mt. Anar Kali And Others serves as a pivotal...
Ramanugrah Singh v. Emperor: Upholding Judicial Integrity in Jury Verdicts

Ramanugrah Singh v. Emperor: Upholding Judicial Integrity in Jury Verdicts

Date: Jun 19, 1946
Ramanugrah Singh v. Emperor: Upholding Judicial Integrity in Jury Verdicts Introduction Ramanugrah Singh v. Emperor is a landmark case adjudicated by the Privy Council on June 18, 1946. The...
Exclusive Ritual Rights in Vaishnavite Temples: Thiruvenkata Ramanuja Pedda Jiyyangarlu Valu v. Prathivathi Bhayankaram Venkatacharlu And Others

Exclusive Ritual Rights in Vaishnavite Temples: Thiruvenkata Ramanuja Pedda Jiyyangarlu Valu v. Prathivathi Bhayankaram Venkatacharlu And Others

Date: May 14, 1946
Exclusive Ritual Rights in Vaishnavite Temples Established Introduction The case of Thiruvenkata Ramanuja Pedda Jiyyangarlu Valu v. Prathivathi Bhayankaram Venkatacharlu And Others was adjudicated by...
Harmes v. Hinkson: Clarifying Burden of Proof and Undue Influence in Will Validation

Harmes v. Hinkson: Clarifying Burden of Proof and Undue Influence in Will Validation

Date: May 14, 1946
Harmes v. Hinkson: Clarifying Burden of Proof and Undue Influence in Will Validation Introduction The case of Harmes and Another v. Hinkson adjudicated by the Privy Council on May 13, 1946, addresses...
Emperor v. Deshpande: Requiring Reasonable Suspicion for Custodial Detentions

Emperor v. Deshpande: Requiring Reasonable Suspicion for Custodial Detentions

Date: May 8, 1946
Emperor v. Vimlabai Deshpande: Requiring Reasonable Suspicion for Custodial Detentions Introduction Emperor v. Vimlabai Deshpande is a landmark judgment delivered by the Privy Council on May 7, 1946....
Kelani Valley Motor Transit Co. Ltd. v. Colombo-Ratnapura Omnibus Co.Ltd.: Defining Exclusive Road Service Licensing

Kelani Valley Motor Transit Co. Ltd. v. Colombo-Ratnapura Omnibus Co.Ltd.: Defining Exclusive Road Service Licensing

Date: May 8, 1946
Kelani Valley Motor Transit Co. Ltd. v. Colombo-Ratnapura Omnibus Co.Ltd.: Defining Exclusive Road Service Licensing Introduction The case of Kelani Valley Motor Transit Co. Ltd. v. Colombo-Ratnapura...
Limitation on Interest Rates under Ottoman Law: The Privy Council's Decision in Beninson And Others v. Shiber

Limitation on Interest Rates under Ottoman Law: The Privy Council's Decision in Beninson And Others v. Shiber

Date: May 3, 1946
Limitation on Interest Rates under Ottoman Law: The Privy Council's Decision in Beninson And Others v. Shiber Introduction The case of Beninson And Others v. Shiber was adjudicated by the Privy...
Comprehensive Compensation for Acquired Land: Insights from Babu Kailash Chandra Jain v. Secretary of State

Comprehensive Compensation for Acquired Land: Insights from Babu Kailash Chandra Jain v. Secretary of State

Date: May 2, 1946
Comprehensive Compensation for Acquired Land: Insights from Babu Kailash Chandra Jain v. Secretary of State Introduction The case of Babu Kailash Chandra Jain v. Secretary of State adjudicated by the...
United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939: Legislative Competence Affirmed

United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939: Legislative Competence Affirmed

Date: May 2, 1946
United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939: Legislative Competence Affirmed Introduction The case of Thakur Jagannath Baksh Singh v. United Provinces addressed pivotal issues concerning legislative...
Trademark Infringement and the Doctrine of Prior Use: V.S. Subbiah Nadar v. E.P. Kumaraval Nadar

Trademark Infringement and the Doctrine of Prior Use: V.S. Subbiah Nadar v. E.P. Kumaraval Nadar

Date: Apr 12, 1946
Trademark Infringement and the Doctrine of Prior Use: V.S. Subbiah Nadar v. E.P. Kumaraval Nadar Introduction The case of V.S. Subbiah Nadar, Administrator Of Estate Of T.P. Sokkalal Ram Sait v. E.P....
Enforceability of Oral Contracts Despite Subsequent Intent for Written Formalization: Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade v. New Mofussil Co. Ltd.

Enforceability of Oral Contracts Despite Subsequent Intent for Written Formalization: Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade v. New Mofussil Co. Ltd.

Date: Mar 14, 1946
Enforceability of Oral Contracts Despite Subsequent Intent for Written Formalization Introduction The case of Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade v. New Mofussil Co. Ltd. And Others is a seminal judgment...
Abdul Rahim v. Emperor: Affirming Appellate Authority Over Jury Verdicts in Indian Criminal Procedure

Abdul Rahim v. Emperor: Affirming Appellate Authority Over Jury Verdicts in Indian Criminal Procedure

Date: Feb 27, 1946
Abdul Rahim v. Emperor: Affirming Appellate Authority Over Jury Verdicts in Indian Criminal Procedure Introduction The case of Abdul Rahim v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Privy Council on February 26,...
Retrospective Legislation and Ultra Vires Challenges: The Precedent Set in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others

Retrospective Legislation and Ultra Vires Challenges: The Precedent Set in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others

Date: Jan 31, 1946
Retrospective Legislation and Ultra Vires Challenges: The Precedent Set in Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others Introduction The landmark case of Punjab Province v. Daulat Singh and Others,...
Validating Arbitration References in Partition Suits: Insights from Chhabba Lal v. Kallu Lal And Others

Validating Arbitration References in Partition Suits: Insights from Chhabba Lal v. Kallu Lal And Others

Date: Jan 22, 1946
Validating Arbitration References in Partition Suits: Insights from Chhabba Lal v. Kallu Lal And Others Introduction The case of Chhabba Lal v. Kallu Lal And Others, adjudicated by the Privy Council...
Principles Governing Compensation Determination in Land Acquisition: M. Samiullah v. Collector Of Aligarh

Principles Governing Compensation Determination in Land Acquisition: M. Samiullah v. Collector Of Aligarh

Date: Jan 15, 1946
Principles Governing Compensation Determination in Land Acquisition: M. Samiullah v. Collector Of Aligarh Introduction The case of M. Samiullah v. Collector Of Aligarh was adjudicated by the Privy...
Establishing Burden of Proof in Heirship Claims: Privy Council's Decision in Jagdish Narain v. Nawab Said Ahmed Khan

Establishing Burden of Proof in Heirship Claims: Privy Council's Decision in Jagdish Narain v. Nawab Said Ahmed Khan

Date: Dec 13, 1945
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For legal counsel regarding specific issues, please consult a qualified...
Taxation of Mining Rights Transactions: Profits from Trade and Cost Deductions – British South Africa Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Taxation of Mining Rights Transactions: Profits from Trade and Cost Deductions – British South Africa Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 30, 1945
Taxation of Mining Rights Transactions: Profits from Trade and Cost Deductions – British South Africa Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of British South Africa Co. v....
Admissibility and Proper Use of Section 164 Statements: Brij Bhushan Singh v. Emperor

Admissibility and Proper Use of Section 164 Statements: Brij Bhushan Singh v. Emperor

Date: Oct 18, 1945
Admissibility and Proper Use of Section 164 Statements: Brij Bhushan Singh v. Emperor Introduction Brij Bhushan Singh v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Privy Council on October 17, 1945, is a landmark...
Raja Bommadevara Naganna Naidu v. Raja Bommadevara Venkatrayulu Naidu: Defining Substantial Injury in Property Sales

Raja Bommadevara Naganna Naidu v. Raja Bommadevara Venkatrayulu Naidu: Defining Substantial Injury in Property Sales

Date: Jul 31, 1945
Raja Bommadevara Naganna Naidu v. Raja Bommadevara Venkatrayulu Naidu: Defining Substantial Injury in Property Sales Introduction The case of Raja Bommadevara Naganna Naidu Bahadur Zamindar Garu v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert