Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds

Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds Introduction The case of M/S JOYSHREE POWEROL v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS, adjudicated by the...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments

Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments Introduction The case of KAMLANG SAW AND VENEER MILLS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS....
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings

Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings Introduction The case of M/S CENT PLY v. Union of India and 2 Ors. was adjudicated in...
Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality

Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality Introduction In the case of Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and...
Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance Introduction The case of M/S Jumbo Roofing and Tiles v. Union of India and 3 Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act Introduction In the landmark case M/S. Bulland Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India and 4 Ors., the...
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India Introduction In the landmark case of Topcem India, Rep By Sri. Arun Kejriwal v. Union Of India, Rep. By The Secretary To...
Necessity of Specificity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Necessity of Specificity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Mar 12, 2021
Necessity of Specificity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Mohd....
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: Deceptive Similarity and Priority of Use in Natures Essence vs. Protogreen Retail Solutions

Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: Deceptive Similarity and Priority of Use in Natures Essence vs. Protogreen Retail Solutions

Date: Mar 10, 2021
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: Deceptive Similarity and Priority of Use in Natures Essence vs. Protogreen Retail Solutions Introduction The case of Natures Essence Private Limited...
Regularization of DLR Workers: Kerala High Court's Landmark Judgment in Hameshdas K.H. v. State Of Kerala

Regularization of DLR Workers: Kerala High Court's Landmark Judgment in Hameshdas K.H. v. State Of Kerala

Date: Mar 10, 2021
Regularization of DLR Workers: Kerala High Court's Landmark Judgment in Hameshdas K.H. v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of Hameshdas K.H. v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High...
Tripura High Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Regularization of Long-Term Casual Workers

Tripura High Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Regularization of Long-Term Casual Workers

Date: Mar 10, 2021
Tripura High Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Regularization of Long-Term Casual Workers Introduction The case of Basudeb Debnath v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the Tripura High Court on March 9,...
Exemption of Insurance Companies under Limited Liability Policies for Gratuitous Passengers: New Precedent in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Daisy Paul

Exemption of Insurance Companies under Limited Liability Policies for Gratuitous Passengers: New Precedent in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Daisy Paul

Date: Mar 9, 2021
Exemption of Insurance Companies under Limited Liability Policies for Gratuitous Passengers: New Precedent in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Daisy Paul Introduction The case of New India Assurance...
Application of Section 439 CrPC Post PMLA Amendments: Analysis of Sai Chandrasekhar v. Directorate of Enforcement

Application of Section 439 CrPC Post PMLA Amendments: Analysis of Sai Chandrasekhar v. Directorate of Enforcement

Date: Mar 6, 2021
Application of Section 439 CrPC Post PMLA Amendments: Analysis of Sai Chandrasekhar v. Directorate of Enforcement Introduction The case of Sai Chandrasekhar v. Directorate of Enforcement, adjudicated...
Enforcement of One-Time Settlement Terms: Patna High Court Upholds Bank's Rights

Enforcement of One-Time Settlement Terms: Patna High Court Upholds Bank's Rights

Date: Mar 6, 2021
Enforcement of One-Time Settlement Terms: Patna High Court Upholds Bank's Rights Introduction The case of Natural Dairy (P) Ltd. Through Its Managing Director Sri. Hemant Kumar Das v. Bank Of Baroda,...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements on Guarantors within Corporate Groups: Insights from Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd.

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements on Guarantors within Corporate Groups: Insights from Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd.

Date: Mar 6, 2021
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements on Guarantors within Corporate Groups: Insights from Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Co. Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of Kotak Mahindra...
Waiver of Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Chakraborty

Waiver of Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Chakraborty

Date: Mar 6, 2021
Waiver of Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Chakraborty Introduction The case of Calcutta State Transport Corporation and Others v. Ashit Chakraborty and Others...
Delhi High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Sethi v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Delhi High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Sethi v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Mar 4, 2021
Delhi High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Sethi v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Shyam Sunder Sethi v. Prashant Commissioner Of...
Sanjeev Kumar v. State of H.P.: High Court Quashes POCSO Conviction Due to Questionable DNA Evidence

Sanjeev Kumar v. State of H.P.: High Court Quashes POCSO Conviction Due to Questionable DNA Evidence

Date: Mar 4, 2021
Sanjeev Kumar v. State of H.P.: High Court Quashes POCSO Conviction Due to Questionable DNA Evidence Introduction In the case of Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh, the Himachal Pradesh High...
Madras High Court Rules Cooperative Society Cannot Invoke SARFAESI Act Provisions

Madras High Court Rules Cooperative Society Cannot Invoke SARFAESI Act Provisions

Date: Mar 4, 2021
Madras High Court Rules Cooperative Society Cannot Invoke SARFAESI Act Provisions Introduction The case of S.P. Ganesan v. Authorised Officer, REPCO Bank, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Rajasthan High Court Upholds Category-Wise Candidate Ratios in Public Service Examinations

Rajasthan High Court Upholds Category-Wise Candidate Ratios in Public Service Examinations

Date: Mar 3, 2021
Rajasthan High Court Upholds Category-Wise Candidate Ratios in Public Service Examinations Introduction The case of The State of Rajasthan and Others v. Kavita Godara and Others was adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert