Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent

Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 2023
Rajasthan High Court Orders Re-examination of PTI Examination Results: Setting a New Precedent Introduction The case of Mahendra Meena v. State of Rajasthan, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand'

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand'

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: A Landmark Decision in 'MD Tauqueer vs. The State of Jharkhand' Introduction The case of MD Tauqueer alias MD Touqeer v. The State of Jharkhand marks a...
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of Shivshankar Paswan v. The State of Jharkhand, adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Basudeo Mahto alias Basu Dev Mahato v. The State of Jharkhand...
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The...
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction The case of Sharat Gope alias Sarat Gope v. The State of Jharkhand...
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction In the landmark case of Sonu Lal v. The State of Jharkhand,...
Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act

Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of The State of Jharkhand v. Ramai Karua and Others...
Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B

Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B Introduction The case of Shoaib Akhtar v. The State of Jharkhand marks a significant turning point in...
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND adjudicated by the Jharkhand High...
Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand

Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand adjudicated by the Jharkhand High Court...
Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand

Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand...
Kerala High Court Clarifies Taxation of Works Contracts under KVAT Act in Prodair Air Products India Pvt Ltd v. State of Kerala

Kerala High Court Clarifies Taxation of Works Contracts under KVAT Act in Prodair Air Products India Pvt Ltd v. State of Kerala

Date: Apr 4, 2023
Kerala High Court Clarifies Taxation of Works Contracts under KVAT Act in Prodair Air Products India Pvt Ltd v. State of Kerala Introduction The case of Prodair Air Products India Private Limited v....
Enforcement of Government Resolutions on Surplus Vacant Land: SALIM ALIMAHOMED PORBANDERWALLA v. The State of Maharashtra

Enforcement of Government Resolutions on Surplus Vacant Land: SALIM ALIMAHOMED PORBANDERWALLA v. The State of Maharashtra

Date: Mar 31, 2023
Enforcement of Government Resolutions on Surplus Vacant Land: SALIM ALIMAHOMED PORBANDERWALLA v. The State of Maharashtra (2023 BHC 2190) Introduction In the case of Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla...
Inherent Limitations on Quashing POCSO Proceedings via Section 482 CrPC: Allahabad High Court's Ruling

Inherent Limitations on Quashing POCSO Proceedings via Section 482 CrPC: Allahabad High Court's Ruling

Date: Mar 30, 2023
Inherent Limitations on Quashing POCSO Proceedings via Section 482 CrPC: Allahabad High Court's Ruling Introduction The judgment in Pravin Kumar Singh And Others Applicants v. State Of U.p. Thru....
Delhi High Court Refines Compensation Calculation: Ruling on Contributory Negligence and Interest Rates under the Motor Vehicles Act

Delhi High Court Refines Compensation Calculation: Ruling on Contributory Negligence and Interest Rates under the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Mar 29, 2023
Delhi High Court Refines Compensation Calculation: Ruling on Contributory Negligence and Interest Rates under the Motor Vehicles Act 1. Introduction The case NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. YAD RAM &...
Suo Motu v. State of Kerala: Ensuring Judicial Integrity by Dismissing Writ Petitions with Suppressed Material Facts

Suo Motu v. State of Kerala: Ensuring Judicial Integrity by Dismissing Writ Petitions with Suppressed Material Facts

Date: Mar 24, 2023
Suo Motu v. State of Kerala: Ensuring Judicial Integrity by Dismissing Writ Petitions with Suppressed Material Facts Introduction The case of Suo Motu v. State Of Kerala Represented By The Principal...
Delhi High Court Clarifies Definition of 'Intermediary' under IGST Act: Impact on Export of Services and Input Tax Credit

Delhi High Court Clarifies Definition of 'Intermediary' under IGST Act: Impact on Export of Services and Input Tax Credit

Date: Mar 24, 2023
Delhi High Court Clarifies Definition of 'Intermediary' under IGST Act: Impact on Export of Services and Input Tax Credit Introduction The case of M/S Ernst and Young Limited v. Additional...
Attribution of Primary Hypertension to Military Service: Insights from Col Jiwan Chandra (Retd) v. UOI

Attribution of Primary Hypertension to Military Service: Insights from Col Jiwan Chandra (Retd) v. UOI

Date: Mar 22, 2023
Attribution of Primary Hypertension to Military Service: Insights from Col Jiwan Chandra (Retd) v. Union of India Introduction The case of Col Jiwan Chandra (Retd) v. Union of India and Ors. (Case...
Delhi High Court Validates CBDT Circular No.19/2019 Mandate on Document Identification Numbers in Income Tax Communications

Delhi High Court Validates CBDT Circular No.19/2019 Mandate on Document Identification Numbers in Income Tax Communications

Date: Mar 21, 2023
Delhi High Court Validates CBDT Circular No.19/2019 Mandate on Document Identification Numbers in Income Tax Communications Introduction In the landmark case of The Commissioner of Income Tax...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert