Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Landmark Affirmation of the Right to Religious Assembly: Vijay Katara v. Principal Secretary

Landmark Affirmation of the Right to Religious Assembly: Vijay Katara v. Principal Secretary

Date: Jan 2, 2025
Landmark Affirmation of the Right to Religious Assembly: Vijay Katara v. Principal Secretary Introduction This commentary examines the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision in Vijay Katara v....
Clarifying Limited Ownership Rights in Pledged Gold: Muthoot Finance v. State of Karnataka

Clarifying Limited Ownership Rights in Pledged Gold: Muthoot Finance v. State of Karnataka

Date: Jan 1, 2025
Clarifying Limited Ownership Rights in Pledged Gold: Muthoot Finance v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction The case of Muthoot Finance Limited v. The State of Karnataka, decided by the Hon’ble High...
Establishing Sub-Committee Oversight and Police Collaboration for Gated Communities: A Landmark Telangana High Court Ruling

Establishing Sub-Committee Oversight and Police Collaboration for Gated Communities: A Landmark Telangana High Court Ruling

Date: Jan 1, 2025
Establishing Sub-Committee Oversight and Police Collaboration for Gated Communities: A Landmark Telangana High Court Ruling Introduction This commentary examines the crucial decision in Ch. Hari...
Ensuring the Procedural Integrity of Confessional Evidence under Section 32 of POTA

Ensuring the Procedural Integrity of Confessional Evidence under Section 32 of POTA

Date: Jan 1, 2025
Ensuring the Procedural Integrity of Confessional Evidence under Section 32 of POTA Introduction The judgment in Farid Ahmed v. State of Jammu & Kashmir, delivered by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court...
Reaffirming the Limited Scope of Interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Reaffirming the Limited Scope of Interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Date: Dec 31, 2024
Reaffirming the Limited Scope of Interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Introduction The Himachal Pradesh High Court’s decision in The Executive Engineer, I&PH...
Reaffirming Adults’ Right to Cohabit Despite Legal Age Restrictions on Marriage

Reaffirming Adults’ Right to Cohabit Despite Legal Age Restrictions on Marriage

Date: Dec 31, 2024
Reaffirming Adults’ Right to Cohabit Despite Legal Age Restrictions on Marriage Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in Anjali Kushwah & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh &...
Strict Timeliness of Demand Notice under Section 138: A Landmark Precedent

Strict Timeliness of Demand Notice under Section 138: A Landmark Precedent

Date: Dec 31, 2024
Strict Timeliness of Demand Notice under Section 138: A Landmark Precedent Introduction The judgment in Kulbhushan Gupta v. Bishambar Ram before the Jammu & Kashmir High Court introduces a pivotal...
Ensuring Equal Treatment in Absorption and Promotions: The Landmark Manipur High Court Ruling

Ensuring Equal Treatment in Absorption and Promotions: The Landmark Manipur High Court Ruling

Date: Dec 28, 2024
Ensuring Equal Treatment in Absorption and Promotions: The Landmark Manipur High Court Ruling 1. Introduction The case of Shri Thongam Homendro Singh & Anr v. State of Manipur & Ors, decided on...
Reaffirming Arbitration Remedies Against Non-Signatories: A Commentary on Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. Miton Credentia Trusteeship Services Ltd. & Ors.

Reaffirming Arbitration Remedies Against Non-Signatories: A Commentary on Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. Miton Credentia Trusteeship Services Ltd. & Ors.

Date: Dec 28, 2024
Reaffirming Arbitration Remedies Against Non-Signatories: A Commentary on Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. Miton Credentia Trusteeship Services Ltd. & Ors. 1. Introduction The recent decision in Pawan Gupta &...
Distinguishing Pension Rights Between Piece-Rated and Regular Employees

Distinguishing Pension Rights Between Piece-Rated and Regular Employees

Date: Dec 28, 2024
Distinguishing Pension Rights Between Piece-Rated and Regular Employees Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in the case of Mohammad Yousuf Mir & Ors. v. Union Territory of J&K &...
Strict Scrutiny of Delay: Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Stand on Condonation in M/S Mani Venkata Constructions v. Chakka Rama Krishna

Strict Scrutiny of Delay: Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Stand on Condonation in M/S Mani Venkata Constructions v. Chakka Rama Krishna

Date: Dec 25, 2024
Strict Scrutiny of Delay: Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Stand on Condonation in M/S Mani Venkata Constructions v. Chakka Rama Krishna 1. Introduction The Judgment delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High...
Delhi High Court’s Refined Approach to Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunctions in Social Media Defamation Cases

Delhi High Court’s Refined Approach to Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunctions in Social Media Defamation Cases

Date: Dec 25, 2024
Delhi High Court’s Refined Approach to Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunctions in Social Media Defamation Cases 1. Introduction The case of Mr. Vinay Maheshwari v. Mr. Manoj Manchu & Ors. was heard before...
Significance of Referring Historical Texts in Hate Speech Allegations: A New Legal Standard

Significance of Referring Historical Texts in Hate Speech Allegations: A New Legal Standard

Date: Dec 22, 2024
Significance of Referring Historical Texts in Hate Speech Allegations: A New Legal Standard I. Introduction The Judgment under discussion arises from Thol. Thirumavalavan v. Dr. V. Vedha, decided by...
Civil Court’s Power to Grant Interim Relief in Labor Disputes: A New Precedent from the Madras High Court

Civil Court’s Power to Grant Interim Relief in Labor Disputes: A New Precedent from the Madras High Court

Date: Dec 22, 2024
Civil Court’s Power to Grant Interim Relief in Labor Disputes: A New Precedent from the Madras High Court 1. Introduction The Judgment in M. Nagappan v. The Management (Madras High Court, 21 December...
“Jurisdiction of Section 148 Notices: JAO’s Exclusive Authority and Faceless Assessment Framework Clarified”

“Jurisdiction of Section 148 Notices: JAO’s Exclusive Authority and Faceless Assessment Framework Clarified”

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Jurisdiction of Section 148 Notices: JAO’s Exclusive Authority and Faceless Assessment Framework Clarified I. Introduction This Judgment from the Madras High Court in Mark Studio India Private...
Reaffirming Limited Judicial Interference in Re-Evaluation: Patna High Court on Multiple Expert Reviews

Reaffirming Limited Judicial Interference in Re-Evaluation: Patna High Court on Multiple Expert Reviews

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Reaffirming Limited Judicial Interference in Re-Evaluation: Patna High Court on Multiple Expert Reviews 1. Introduction This lengthy litigation involves the Bihar Public Service Commission (“the...
Patna High Court Affirms Prohibition on Recovery from Class III Retirees Absent Fraud

Patna High Court Affirms Prohibition on Recovery from Class III Retirees Absent Fraud

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Patna High Court Affirms Prohibition on Recovery from Class III Retirees Absent Fraud 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Patna High Court’s decision in the case of Pramod Kumar Sinha v. The...
Reaffirming the Mandatory Requirement of Stating Reasons for Ex Parte Injunctions: BOWRING INSTITUTE v. MR. SARWIK S (2024)

Reaffirming the Mandatory Requirement of Stating Reasons for Ex Parte Injunctions: BOWRING INSTITUTE v. MR. SARWIK S (2024)

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Reaffirming the Mandatory Requirement of Stating Reasons for Ex Parte Injunctions: BOWRING INSTITUTE v. MR. SARWIK S (2024) 1. Introduction This case, Bowring Institute v. Mr. Sarwik S., was heard by...
Judicial Deference to Executive Infrastructure Projects: The Gandhi Bazaar Redesign Precedent

Judicial Deference to Executive Infrastructure Projects: The Gandhi Bazaar Redesign Precedent

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Judicial Deference to Executive Infrastructure Projects: The Gandhi Bazaar Redesign Precedent 1. Introduction On December 20, 2024, the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru delivered a noteworthy...
Exclusive Right of Appeal under Section 16 of the MWPSC Act: A Landmark Ruling by the Karnataka High Court

Exclusive Right of Appeal under Section 16 of the MWPSC Act: A Landmark Ruling by the Karnataka High Court

Date: Dec 21, 2024
Exclusive Right of Appeal under Section 16 of the MWPSC Act: A Landmark Ruling by the Karnataka High Court I. Introduction The Karnataka High Court, in the case of Sri K. Lokesh v. The Bangalore...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert