Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Balancing Transparency and Privacy in RTI Disclosures: Insights from Thdc India Ltd. v. R.K. Raturi

Balancing Transparency and Privacy in RTI Disclosures: Insights from Thdc India Ltd. v. R.K. Raturi

Date: Jul 9, 2014
Balancing Transparency and Privacy in RTI Disclosures: Insights from Thdc India Ltd. v. R.K. Raturi Introduction The case of Thdc India Ltd. v. R.K. Raturi adjudicated by the Delhi High Court on July...
Exclusion of Passenger Liability in Act Only Policies: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lilabai Shrimant Misal

Exclusion of Passenger Liability in Act Only Policies: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lilabai Shrimant Misal

Date: Jul 8, 2014
Exclusion of Passenger Liability in Act Only Policies: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lilabai Shrimant Misal Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lilabai Shrimant...
Kerala High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Appellate Authority Appointments under the Electricity Act, 2003

Kerala High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Appellate Authority Appointments under the Electricity Act, 2003

Date: Jul 8, 2014
Kerala High Court Establishes Strict Compliance for Appellate Authority Appointments under the Electricity Act, 2003 Introduction The case of Muhammed Haji v. Kerala State Electricity Board presented...
Reaffirming Statutory Remedies: Insights from Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kalanithi Maran

Reaffirming Statutory Remedies: Insights from Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kalanithi Maran

Date: Jul 5, 2014
Reaffirming Statutory Remedies: Insights from Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kalanithi Maran Introduction The case of Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kalanithi Maran, adjudicated by the...
Defining Shareholder Status under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of IT-9 v. Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd.

Defining Shareholder Status under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of IT-9 v. Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jul 5, 2014
Defining Shareholder Status under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner Of IT-9 v. Impact Containers Pvt. Ltd. Introduction Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Impact...
Clarifying Employer-Employee Relationships in Public Sector Contracts: Insights from Gopal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Clarifying Employer-Employee Relationships in Public Sector Contracts: Insights from Gopal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Date: Jul 4, 2014
Clarifying Employer-Employee Relationships in Public Sector Contracts: Insights from Gopal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Introduction The case of Gopal v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), adjudicated...
Allahabad High Court Reinforces Expeditious Consideration of Bail Applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in Munawwar v. State Of U.P.

Allahabad High Court Reinforces Expeditious Consideration of Bail Applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in Munawwar v. State Of U.P.

Date: Jul 4, 2014
Allahabad High Court Reinforces Expeditious Consideration of Bail Applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in Munawwar v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Munawwar v. State Of U.P. (Allahabad...
Deciding Reasonable Time Limits for Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: A Commentary on Income Tax v. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited

Deciding Reasonable Time Limits for Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: A Commentary on Income Tax v. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited

Date: Jul 4, 2014
Deciding Reasonable Time Limits for Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: A Commentary on Income Tax v. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited 1. Introduction The case of Income Tax v. Mahindra &...
Reliance on Retracted Confessional Statements in Customs Penalty Imposition: The K.P. Abdul Majeed Case

Reliance on Retracted Confessional Statements in Customs Penalty Imposition: The K.P. Abdul Majeed Case

Date: Jul 4, 2014
Reliance on Retracted Confessional Statements in Customs Penalty Imposition: The K.P. Abdul Majeed Case Introduction The case of K.P. Abdul Majeed v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin adjudicated by...
Finality of Arbitral Awards and Limited Grounds for Annulment: Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitration Act, 1996

Finality of Arbitral Awards and Limited Grounds for Annulment: Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitration Act, 1996

Date: Jul 3, 2014
Finality of Arbitral Awards and Limited Grounds for Annulment: Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitration Act, 1996 Introduction The case of State Trading Corporation Of India Limited v. Toepfer...
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: "Officer’s Choice" vs. "Collector’s Choice"

Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: "Officer’s Choice" vs. "Collector’s Choice"

Date: Jul 2, 2014
Delhi High Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: "Officer’s Choice" vs. "Collector’s Choice" Introduction The case of Allied Blenders & Distillers (P) Ltd. v. Shree Nath Heritage Liquor (P) Ltd....
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries: Radnik Exports v. Standard Chartered Bank

Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries: Radnik Exports v. Standard Chartered Bank

Date: Jul 2, 2014
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries: Radnik Exports v. Standard Chartered Bank Introduction The case of Radnik Exports v. Standard Chartered Bank adjudicated by the Delhi High Court on July 1,...
Deceptive Similarity and the Anti-Dissection Rule in Pharmaceutical Trademark Infringement: Stiefel Laboratories v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd.

Deceptive Similarity and the Anti-Dissection Rule in Pharmaceutical Trademark Infringement: Stiefel Laboratories v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd.

Date: Jul 2, 2014
Deceptive Similarity and the Anti-Dissection Rule in Pharmaceutical Trademark Infringement: Stiefel Laboratories v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. Introduction The case of Stiefel Laboratories v. Ajanta Pharma...
Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Proof Requirement for Presumption of Will Revocation in Property Partition Cases

Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Proof Requirement for Presumption of Will Revocation in Property Partition Cases

Date: Jul 2, 2014
Delhi High Court Establishes Strict Proof Requirement for Presumption of Will Revocation in Property Partition Cases Introduction The case of Satish Kumar Chojar v. Subhashni Chopra adjudicated by...
Affidavit-Based Retractions and the Non-Admissibility of Survey Statements as Basis for Additions: Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot III v. M P Scrap Traders

Affidavit-Based Retractions and the Non-Admissibility of Survey Statements as Basis for Additions: Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot III v. M P Scrap Traders

Date: Jul 2, 2014
Affidavit-Based Retractions and the Non-Admissibility of Survey Statements as Basis for Additions: Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot III v. M P Scrap Traders Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Clarifying the Scope of Natural Justice in Customs Adjudications: Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Union Of India

Clarifying the Scope of Natural Justice in Customs Adjudications: Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 1, 2014
Clarifying the Scope of Natural Justice in Customs Adjudications: Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Patel Engineering Ltd. v. Union Of India And Anr. S adjudicated by...
Madras High Court Establishes that Pendency of FIRs Does Not Constitute Pending Court Proceedings for Passport Issuance

Madras High Court Establishes that Pendency of FIRs Does Not Constitute Pending Court Proceedings for Passport Issuance

Date: Jun 28, 2014
Madras High Court Establishes that Pendency of FIRs Does Not Constitute Pending Court Proceedings for Passport Issuance Introduction The case of Mr. W. Jaihar William Petitioner v. Mr. Silambarasan...
High Court Affirms Inherent Powers of Rent Control Courts to Order Joint Trials in Rent Control Petitions: Analysis of T.V Krishna Iyer v. Abdul Rasheod

High Court Affirms Inherent Powers of Rent Control Courts to Order Joint Trials in Rent Control Petitions: Analysis of T.V Krishna Iyer v. Abdul Rasheod

Date: Jun 27, 2014
High Court Affirms Inherent Powers of Rent Control Courts to Order Joint Trials in Rent Control Petitions: Analysis of T.V Krishna Iyer v. Abdul Rasheod Introduction The case of T.V Krishna Iyer v....
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under the Motor Vehicles Act: Smt. Padmavathi v. Ravichandran

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under the Motor Vehicles Act: Smt. Padmavathi v. Ravichandran

Date: Jun 26, 2014
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under the Motor Vehicles Act: Smt. Padmavathi v. Ravichandran Introduction Court: Karnataka High Court Date: June 25, 2014 Case: Smt. Padmavathi...
Judicial Scrutiny on the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009: Balancing Expediency and Constitutional Guarantees

Judicial Scrutiny on the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009: Balancing Expediency and Constitutional Guarantees

Date: Jun 25, 2014
Judicial Scrutiny on the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009: Balancing Expediency and Constitutional Guarantees 1. Introduction The case of Maheshwar Mandal & Anr. v. The State Of Bihar & Ors....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert