Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Kerala High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendment to MVT Act, Clarifying 'Purchase Value'

Kerala High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendment to MVT Act, Clarifying 'Purchase Value'

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Kerala High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendment to MVT Act, Clarifying 'Purchase Value' 1. Introduction The case of Nagendra Mani. N. v. State Of Kerala addressed whether purchasers of luxury...
Establishing Merit-Based Seniority: A Comprehensive Analysis of N. Santosh Kumar v. V. Sendhil Kumar

Establishing Merit-Based Seniority: A Comprehensive Analysis of N. Santosh Kumar v. V. Sendhil Kumar

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Establishing Merit-Based Seniority: A Comprehensive Analysis of N. Santosh Kumar v. V. Sendhil Kumar Introduction The case of N. Santosh Kumar v. V. Sendhil Kumar, adjudicated by the Madras High...
Approach Road Method for Measuring Agricultural Land Distance Confirmed by Bombay High Court

Approach Road Method for Measuring Agricultural Land Distance Confirmed by Bombay High Court

Date: Mar 31, 2015
Approach Road Method for Measuring Agricultural Land Distance Confirmed by Bombay High Court Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Nitish Rameshchandra Chordia (And Connected...
Clarifying Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: Appellate Court's Suo Motu Powers and Anti-Fraud Measures in N. Natarajan v. Executive Officer, Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat

Clarifying Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: Appellate Court's Suo Motu Powers and Anti-Fraud Measures in N. Natarajan v. Executive Officer, Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat

Date: Mar 31, 2015
Clarifying Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: Appellate Court's Suo Motu Powers and Anti-Fraud Measures in N. Natarajan v. Executive Officer, Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat Introduction The case of N. Natarajan v....
Clarifying Deletion of Additions Under Section 41(1): Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Matruprasad C. Pandey

Clarifying Deletion of Additions Under Section 41(1): Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Matruprasad C. Pandey

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Clarifying Deletion of Additions Under Section 41(1): Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Matruprasad C. Pandey Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Matruprasad C....
Strict Interpretation of NIA Act Required for U.A.P Act Cases: Bahadur Kora v. State of Bihar

Strict Interpretation of NIA Act Required for U.A.P Act Cases: Bahadur Kora v. State of Bihar

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Strict Interpretation of NIA Act Required for U.A.P Act Cases: Bahadur Kora v. State of Bihar Introduction The case of Bahadur Kora And Others v. State Of Bihar adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union Of India: Upholding the Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) Central Excise Rules, 2002

Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union Of India: Upholding the Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) Central Excise Rules, 2002

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union Of India: Upholding the Unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) Central Excise Rules, 2002 Introduction The case of Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v....
Delhi High Court Upholds LIBOR-Based Arm's Length Interest Rate in Transfer Pricing Case

Delhi High Court Upholds LIBOR-Based Arm's Length Interest Rate in Transfer Pricing Case

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Delhi High Court Upholds LIBOR-Based Arm's Length Interest Rate in Transfer Pricing Case Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd. S,...
Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Reason to Believe' for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act

Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Reason to Believe' for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Reason to Believe' for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act Introduction In the landmark case of Krown Agro Foods Pvt. Limited v. Assistant...
Flexibility in EMD Validity Periods: Delhi High Court in PES Installations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Flexibility in EMD Validity Periods: Delhi High Court in PES Installations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Date: Mar 28, 2015
Flexibility in EMD Validity Periods: Delhi High Court in PES Installations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr. Introduction The case of PES Installations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India &...
Defining 'Undertaking' in Income Tax Act: Gujarat High Court Strikes Down Retrospective Amendment as Unconstitutional

Defining 'Undertaking' in Income Tax Act: Gujarat High Court Strikes Down Retrospective Amendment as Unconstitutional

Date: Mar 27, 2015
Defining 'Undertaking' in Income Tax Act: Gujarat High Court Strikes Down Retrospective Amendment as Unconstitutional Introduction The case of Niko Resources Limited v. Union Of India & 1 S,...
Tata Business Support Services Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Limits of Reopening Assessments

Tata Business Support Services Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Limits of Reopening Assessments

Date: Mar 27, 2015
Tata Business Support Services Ltd. v. Income Tax: Reaffirming the Limits of Reopening Assessments Introduction The case of Tata Business Support Services Ltd. v. Income Tax, adjudicated by the...
Rebate Claims Under Central Excise: Time Limitation and Rule Interpretation

Rebate Claims Under Central Excise: Time Limitation and Rule Interpretation

Date: Mar 27, 2015
Rebate Claims Under Central Excise: Time Limitation and Rule Interpretation Introduction The case of The Deputy Commissioner Of Central Excise, Poonamallee Range I, Poonamallee Division, Chennai...
Enforcement of Anti-Cash Transaction Provisions: P. Muthukaruppan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Enforcement of Anti-Cash Transaction Provisions: P. Muthukaruppan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Mar 27, 2015
Enforcement of Anti-Cash Transaction Provisions: P. Muthukaruppan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of P. Muthukaruppan v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,...
Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a)

Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a)

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Dismissal of Police Personnel on Criminal Conviction: Interpretation of Article 311(2)(a) Introduction The case of State Of U.P. Thru. Sec. Home And Others v. Prem Milan Tiwari, Constable adjudicated...
High Court Upholds Wipro Ltd.'s Entitlement to Foreign Tax Credit and Deductions Under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act

High Court Upholds Wipro Ltd.'s Entitlement to Foreign Tax Credit and Deductions Under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act

Date: Mar 26, 2015
High Court Upholds Wipro Ltd.'s Entitlement to Foreign Tax Credit and Deductions Under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Wipro Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (And...
Validity of Section 153C Notice in Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society

Validity of Section 153C Notice in Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Validity of Section 153C Notice in Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii,...
Clarifying the Scope of Fringe Benefit Tax: Income Tax v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.

Clarifying the Scope of Fringe Benefit Tax: Income Tax v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Clarifying the Scope of Fringe Benefit Tax: Income Tax v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Introduction The case of Income Tax v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Act: Emphasizing Procedural Compliance and Natural Justice

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Act: Emphasizing Procedural Compliance and Natural Justice

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Act: Emphasizing Procedural Compliance and Natural Justice Introduction The case of Tushar Jivram Chauhan And Another v. State Of Maharashtra And Others adjudicated by...
High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions of Educational Trust Against Capitation Fee Allegations

High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions of Educational Trust Against Capitation Fee Allegations

Date: Mar 25, 2015
High Court Upholds Tax Exemptions of Educational Trust Against Capitation Fee Allegations Introduction In the landmark case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central III vs. Balaji Educational &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert