Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Enforcing the Principle of Natural Justice in Admission Cancellations: Rajneesh Singh v. Madhya Pradesh State

Enforcing the Principle of Natural Justice in Admission Cancellations: Rajneesh Singh v. Madhya Pradesh State

Date: Dec 2, 2014
Enforcing the Principle of Natural Justice in Admission Cancellations: Rajneesh Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Rajneesh Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh adjudicated...
Essel Infraprojects Ltd. v. Devendra Prakash Mishra: Reinforcing Specificity in Defamation Litigation

Essel Infraprojects Ltd. v. Devendra Prakash Mishra: Reinforcing Specificity in Defamation Litigation

Date: Dec 2, 2014
Essel Infraprojects Ltd. v. Devendra Prakash Mishra: Reinforcing Specificity in Defamation Litigation Introduction The case of Essel Infraprojects Limited v. Devendra Prakash Mishra was adjudicated...
New India Assurance v. Azhagusumathi: Insurer’s Liability Post-Policy Cancellation in Motor Accident Claims

New India Assurance v. Azhagusumathi: Insurer’s Liability Post-Policy Cancellation in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Dec 2, 2014
New India Assurance v. Azhagusumathi: Insurer’s Liability Post-Policy Cancellation in Motor Accident Claims Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Azhagusumathi was adjudicated by...
Clarifying the Definition of 'Ammunition' under the Arms Act: Sh. Gaganjot Singh v. State

Clarifying the Definition of 'Ammunition' under the Arms Act: Sh. Gaganjot Singh v. State

Date: Dec 2, 2014
Clarifying the Definition of 'Ammunition' under the Arms Act: Sh. Gaganjot Singh v. State Introduction The case of Sh. Gaganjot Singh Petitioner v. State, adjudicated by the Delhi High Court on...
Penalty Imposed Under Section 271(1)(c) Upheld in Commissioner Of Income v. Ng Technologies Ltd.

Penalty Imposed Under Section 271(1)(c) Upheld in Commissioner Of Income v. Ng Technologies Ltd.

Date: Dec 2, 2014
Penalty Imposed Under Section 271(1)(c) Upheld in Commissioner Of Income v. Ng Technologies Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income v. Ng Technologies Ltd. deliberated on the imposition...
Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances

Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances

Date: Nov 29, 2014
Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances Introduction The case of Hindustan Copper Limited Through Its General Manager (Mines) Petitioner v. Union Of India Through Its...
Madras High Court Establishes Indefeasibility of Cenvat Credit upon Exemption of Final Product

Madras High Court Establishes Indefeasibility of Cenvat Credit upon Exemption of Final Product

Date: Nov 29, 2014
Madras High Court Establishes Indefeasibility of Cenvat Credit upon Exemption of Final Product Introduction The case of Tractor And Farm Equipment Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise adjudicated...
Delhi High Court Establishes Fundamental Autonomy for Private Unaided Schools in Student Admissions

Delhi High Court Establishes Fundamental Autonomy for Private Unaided Schools in Student Admissions

Date: Nov 29, 2014
Delhi High Court Establishes Fundamental Autonomy for Private Unaided Schools in Student Admissions Introduction The Delhi High Court, in the landmark case of Forum For Promotion Of Quality Education...
Gujarat High Court Strikes Down CENVAT Credit Restriction under Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002

Gujarat High Court Strikes Down CENVAT Credit Restriction under Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002

Date: Nov 28, 2014
Gujarat High Court Strikes Down CENVAT Credit Restriction under Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 1. Introduction The case of Indsur Global Ltd. vs. Union Of India & 2 (S) adjudicated by the...
Avtar Singh Dyal v. H.P State Electricity Board: Affirmation of Pay Fixation Benefits for Ex-Servicemen Amid Seniority Disputes

Avtar Singh Dyal v. H.P State Electricity Board: Affirmation of Pay Fixation Benefits for Ex-Servicemen Amid Seniority Disputes

Date: Nov 27, 2014
Avtar Singh Dyal v. H.P State Electricity Board: Affirmation of Pay Fixation Benefits for Ex-Servicemen Amid Seniority Disputes Introduction The case of Avtar Singh Dyal Petitioner v. H.P State...
Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Decision in State Of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Jai Kishan Bhatiya: Establishing Protocols for Employment Status Verification of Store Munshis

Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Decision in State Of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Jai Kishan Bhatiya: Establishing Protocols for Employment Status Verification of Store Munshis

Date: Nov 27, 2014
Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Decision in State Of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Jai Kishan Bhatiya: Establishing Protocols for Employment Status Verification of Store Munshis Introduction The case of State...
Madras High Court Establishes Section 18 Refunds Under Section 19 Conditions in TNVAT Act

Madras High Court Establishes Section 18 Refunds Under Section 19 Conditions in TNVAT Act

Date: Nov 27, 2014
Madras High Court Establishes Section 18 Refunds Under Section 19 Conditions in TNVAT Act Introduction In the case of M/S. Interfit Techno Products Ltd. v. The Principal Secretary/Commissioner Of...
Ensuring Fundamental Natural Justice in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of B. Manjula v. District Collector

Ensuring Fundamental Natural Justice in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of B. Manjula v. District Collector

Date: Nov 27, 2014
Ensuring Fundamental Natural Justice in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of B. Manjula v. District Collector Introduction The case of B. Manjula v. District Collector adjudicated by the Andhra...
Madras High Court Establishes Allotment Date as Acquisition Date for Capital Gains

Madras High Court Establishes Allotment Date as Acquisition Date for Capital Gains

Date: Nov 26, 2014
Madras High Court Establishes Allotment Date as Acquisition Date for Capital Gains Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax Salary Circle, Chennai v. Sri. S.R Jeyashankar (No. 19/13)...
Clarifying the Application of Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act in Proving Illegal Import Under the Abkari Act

Clarifying the Application of Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act in Proving Illegal Import Under the Abkari Act

Date: Nov 26, 2014
Clarifying the Application of Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act in Proving Illegal Import Under the Abkari Act Introduction In the landmark case of Tippu Mohammed v. State Of Kerala, adjudicated...
Strict Compliance for Disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.

Strict Compliance for Disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.

Date: Nov 26, 2014
Strict Compliance for Disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D: Analysis of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income...
Right to Correct Birth Records Affirmed: Gujarat High Court Rules in Madhavi Sandip Patel v. Registrar Birth and Death Department

Right to Correct Birth Records Affirmed: Gujarat High Court Rules in Madhavi Sandip Patel v. Registrar Birth and Death Department

Date: Nov 25, 2014
Right to Correct Birth Records Affirmed: Gujarat High Court Rules in Madhavi Sandip Patel v. Registrar Birth and Death Department Introduction The case of Madhavi Sandip Patel Petitioner(S) v....
Delhi High Court Reinforces Privacy Protections in RTI Act: Naresh Trehan v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Delhi High Court Reinforces Privacy Protections in RTI Act: Naresh Trehan v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Date: Nov 25, 2014
Delhi High Court Reinforces Privacy Protections in RTI Act: Naresh Trehan v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta Introduction The case of Naresh Trehan Petitioner v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta was adjudicated by the Delhi...
Clarification on Plaintiff's Right to Rebuttal Evidence under Order 18 Rules 1 & 3 CPC: Avtar Singh v. Baldev Singh

Clarification on Plaintiff's Right to Rebuttal Evidence under Order 18 Rules 1 & 3 CPC: Avtar Singh v. Baldev Singh

Date: Nov 22, 2014
Clarification on Plaintiff's Right to Rebuttal Evidence under Order 18 Rules 1 & 3 CPC: Avtar Singh v. Baldev Singh Introduction The case of Avtar Singh And Another Petitioners v. Baldev Singh And...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Delhi High Court's Landmark Decision in Ankur Chawla Petitioner v. CBI

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Delhi High Court's Landmark Decision in Ankur Chawla Petitioner v. CBI

Date: Nov 21, 2014
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Delhi High Court's Landmark Decision in Ankur Chawla Petitioner v. Central Bureau Of Investigation & Ors. Introduction The case of Ankur Chawla...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert