Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others

Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others

Date: Mar 21, 2015
Regulation 101 Amendment and Its Implications: Insights from Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others Introduction The case of Abhishek Tripathi v. State Of U.P. And Others delivered by the...
Delhi High Court Establishes Multiplier Selection Based on Deceased or Claimant’s Age in Compensation Calculation

Delhi High Court Establishes Multiplier Selection Based on Deceased or Claimant’s Age in Compensation Calculation

Date: Mar 21, 2015
Delhi High Court Establishes Multiplier Selection Based on Deceased or Claimant’s Age in Compensation Calculation Introduction The case of Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Maneesha Karnatak And...
Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors.

Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors.

Date: Mar 20, 2015
Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Educational Institutions: Insights from Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam And Ors. Introduction The case of Abdul Gofur Mondal v. State Of Assam...
Delhi High Court Upholds Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for Developers: Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Vrm India Ltd.

Delhi High Court Upholds Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for Developers: Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Vrm India Ltd.

Date: Mar 19, 2015
Delhi High Court Upholds Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for Developers: Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Vrm India Ltd. Introduction The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Vrm India Ltd. is a...
Doctrine of Merger in Income Tax Appeals under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K. Sera Sera Productions Limited

Doctrine of Merger in Income Tax Appeals under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K. Sera Sera Productions Limited

Date: Mar 19, 2015
Doctrine of Merger in Income Tax Appeals under Section 263: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K. Sera Sera Productions Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K. Sera...
Delhi High Court Upholds Privacy of UPSC Selection Committee Members Under RTI Act

Delhi High Court Upholds Privacy of UPSC Selection Committee Members Under RTI Act

Date: Mar 18, 2015
Delhi High Court Upholds Privacy of UPSC Selection Committee Members Under RTI Act Introduction The case of Union Public Service Commission Petitioner v. Dr. Mahesh Mangalat (Delhi High Court, 2015)...
Delhi High Court Establishes Robust Standards for Comparative Advertising in Havells vs. Khaitan

Delhi High Court Establishes Robust Standards for Comparative Advertising in Havells vs. Khaitan

Date: Mar 18, 2015
Delhi High Court Establishes Robust Standards for Comparative Advertising in Havells vs. Khaitan Introduction The case of Havells India Ltd. v. Amritanshu Khaitan adjudicated by the Delhi High Court...
Sony India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Establishing New Precedent on AMP Expense Classification under Transfer Pricing Regulations

Sony India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Establishing New Precedent on AMP Expense Classification under Transfer Pricing Regulations

Date: Mar 17, 2015
Sony India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Establishing New Precedent on AMP Expense Classification under Transfer Pricing Regulations Introduction The case of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications...
Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Section 36(1)(iii) in Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-III v. M/S. DD Industries Ltd.

Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Section 36(1)(iii) in Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-III v. M/S. DD Industries Ltd.

Date: Mar 14, 2015
Delhi High Court Sets Precedent on Section 36(1)(iii) in Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-III v. M/S. DD Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-III v. M/S. DD...
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act

Calcutta High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Mar 14, 2015
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Compensation Assessment under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act Introduction The case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Buro Mahara And Others adjudicated...
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act: Insights from Panoli Intermediate (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & 2

Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act: Insights from Panoli Intermediate (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & 2

Date: Mar 14, 2015
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act: Insights from Panoli Intermediate (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & 2 Introduction The case of Panoli...
Limited Scope of Arbitration Clauses: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Trial Court's Interpretation in P. Madhusudhan Rao v. Lt. Col. Ravi Manan

Limited Scope of Arbitration Clauses: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Trial Court's Interpretation in P. Madhusudhan Rao v. Lt. Col. Ravi Manan

Date: Mar 13, 2015
Limited Scope of Arbitration Clauses: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Trial Court's Interpretation in P. Madhusudhan Rao v. Lt. Col. Ravi Manan Introduction The case of P. Madhusudhan Rao...
Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Public Authority' Status Under RTI Act: Hardicon Ltd. v. Madan Lal

Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Public Authority' Status Under RTI Act: Hardicon Ltd. v. Madan Lal

Date: Mar 13, 2015
Delhi High Court Clarifies 'Public Authority' Status Under RTI Act: Hardicon Ltd. v. Madan Lal Introduction The case of Hardicon Ltd. Petitioner v. Madan Lal adjudicated by the Delhi High Court on...
Exclusion of Gallantry Awards in Higher Command Nominations: Analysis of Col. A.K. Singh v. Union Of India & Ors.

Exclusion of Gallantry Awards in Higher Command Nominations: Analysis of Col. A.K. Singh v. Union Of India & Ors.

Date: Mar 13, 2015
Exclusion of Gallantry Awards in Higher Command Nominations: Analysis of Col. A.K. Singh v. Union Of India & Ors. Introduction The case of Col. A.K. Singh v. Union Of India & Ors., adjudicated by the...
Delhi High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Assessing Unexplained Credits Under Section 68

Delhi High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Assessing Unexplained Credits Under Section 68

Date: Mar 12, 2015
Delhi High Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Assessing Unexplained Credits Under Section 68 Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S. Jansampark Advertising And...
Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Mar 11, 2015
Restricting Reassessment Powers under Section 147: Insights from Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt....
Kerala High Court Upholds Supreme Court’s Interpretation of 'Shared Household' under the Domestic Violence Act

Kerala High Court Upholds Supreme Court’s Interpretation of 'Shared Household' under the Domestic Violence Act

Date: Mar 11, 2015
Kerala High Court Upholds Supreme Court’s Interpretation of 'Shared Household' under the Domestic Violence Act Introduction The case of A.R. Hashir v. Shima adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on...
Constitutional Validity of Section 48-B: Madras High Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1996

Constitutional Validity of Section 48-B: Madras High Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1996

Date: Mar 11, 2015
Constitutional Validity of Section 48-B: Madras High Court Upholds Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1996 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Anti Corruption Movement v. Chief Secretary To Government Of...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Broad Interpretation of Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, Allowing Preemption on Complete Share Transfers

Calcutta High Court Upholds Broad Interpretation of Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, Allowing Preemption on Complete Share Transfers

Date: Mar 11, 2015
Calcutta High Court Upholds Broad Interpretation of Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, Allowing Preemption on Complete Share Transfers Introduction The case of Sk. Sajhan Ali & Ors. v....
High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities

High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities

Date: Mar 11, 2015
High Court Affirms 12AA Registration of Apeejay Education Society, Upholding Genuine Educational Activities Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar Petitioner(S) v. M/S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert