Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Allahabad High Court Upholds Power of Attorney Holder's Right to File Writ Petitions under Article 226

Allahabad High Court Upholds Power of Attorney Holder's Right to File Writ Petitions under Article 226

Date: Jan 23, 2016
Allahabad High Court Upholds Power of Attorney Holder's Right to File Writ Petitions under Article 226 Introduction In the landmark case of Syed Wasif Husain Rizvi Petitioner v. Hasan Raza Khan & 6...
Bail Provisions for Women in Homicidal Cases: Insights from Savitri Devi v. State Of H.P.

Bail Provisions for Women in Homicidal Cases: Insights from Savitri Devi v. State Of H.P.

Date: Jan 23, 2016
Bail Provisions for Women in Homicidal Cases: Insights from Savitri Devi v. State Of H.P Introduction Savitri Devi v. State Of H.P. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Himachal Pradesh High Court...
Limitations on Collection Charges Under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act: Insights from Deputy Tahsildar v. Vijaya Builders

Limitations on Collection Charges Under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act: Insights from Deputy Tahsildar v. Vijaya Builders

Date: Jan 22, 2016
Limitations on Collection Charges Under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act: Insights from The Deputy Tahsildar vs. Vijaya Builders Introduction The case of The Deputy Tahsildar, (Rr) Kerala Financial...
Clarification on Section 263 of the Income Tax Act: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another v. Saravana Developers

Clarification on Section 263 of the Income Tax Act: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another v. Saravana Developers

Date: Jan 22, 2016
Clarification on Section 263 of the Income Tax Act: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another v. Saravana Developers Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Delhi High Court Clarifies Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey & Ors.

Delhi High Court Clarifies Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey & Ors.

Date: Jan 21, 2016
Delhi High Court Clarifies Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey & Ors. 1. Introduction The case of Ultra Home...
Taxation of Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents: Farida Leather Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Taxation of Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents: Farida Leather Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Jan 21, 2016
Taxation of Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents: Farida Leather Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S. Farida Leather...
Delhi High Court Upholds Deductibility of Software Purchase Payments in VAR Agreements

Delhi High Court Upholds Deductibility of Software Purchase Payments in VAR Agreements

Date: Jan 20, 2016
Delhi High Court Upholds Deductibility of Software Purchase Payments in VAR Agreements Introduction In the landmark case of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M.Tech India P. Ltd., decided...
High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C to Invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C for Concurrent Sentences: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arjun Ram v. State Of Raj. & Ors.

High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C to Invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C for Concurrent Sentences: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arjun Ram v. State Of Raj. & Ors.

Date: Jan 20, 2016
High Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 482 Cr.P.C to Invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C for Concurrent Sentences: A Comprehensive Analysis of Arjun Ram v. State Of Raj. & Ors. Introduction The case of...
Equality and Accountability in Superannuation Extensions: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Discriminatory Criteria and Enforces Restitution

Equality and Accountability in Superannuation Extensions: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Discriminatory Criteria and Enforces Restitution

Date: Jan 20, 2016
Equality and Accountability in Superannuation Extensions: Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Discriminatory Criteria and Enforces Restitution Introduction The case of Dr. Nirmala Arunrao Wankhede v. The...
Ensuring Precision in RTI Applications to Prevent Abuse: Insights from Shail Sahni v. Smt Valsa Sara Mathew

Ensuring Precision in RTI Applications to Prevent Abuse: Insights from Shail Sahni v. Smt Valsa Sara Mathew

Date: Jan 20, 2016
Ensuring Precision in RTI Applications to Prevent Abuse: Insights from Shail Sahni v. Smt Valsa Sara Mathew Introduction The case of Shail Sahni v. Smt Valsa Sara Mathew And Others was adjudicated by...
Preservation of Employment Benefits in Corporate Mergers: Analysis of NTPC Power Workers Union v. N.T.P.C.

Preservation of Employment Benefits in Corporate Mergers: Analysis of NTPC Power Workers Union v. N.T.P.C.

Date: Jan 20, 2016
Preservation of Employment Benefits in Corporate Mergers: Analysis of NTPC Power Workers Union v. N.T.P.C. Introduction The case of General Secretary, N.T.P.C. Power Workers Union & Another...
Preservation of Tenure Rights for State Commission Members Post-State Reorganization: T. Ashok Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Preservation of Tenure Rights for State Commission Members Post-State Reorganization: T. Ashok Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Date: Jan 19, 2016
Preservation of Tenure Rights for State Commission Members Post-State Reorganization: T. Ashok Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh Introduction The case of T. Ashok Kumar And Another Petitioners v. The...
Comprehensive Commentary on Surender Kumar Khurana v. Tilak Raj Khurana: Establishing the Necessity of Clear HUF Formation Post-1956

Comprehensive Commentary on Surender Kumar Khurana v. Tilak Raj Khurana: Establishing the Necessity of Clear HUF Formation Post-1956

Date: Jan 19, 2016
Comprehensive Commentary on Surender Kumar Khurana v. Tilak Raj Khurana: Establishing the Necessity of Clear HUF Formation Post-1956 Introduction The case of Surender Kumar Khurana v. Tilak Raj...
Strict Compliance Required for HUF Establishment Post-1956: Analysis of Surender Kumar v. Dhani Ram

Strict Compliance Required for HUF Establishment Post-1956: Analysis of Surender Kumar v. Dhani Ram

Date: Jan 19, 2016
Strict Compliance Required for Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) Establishment Post-Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Analysis of Surender Kumar v. Dhani Ram Introduction The case of Surender Kumar v. Dhani...
Clarification on Reassessment Under Section 148: Importance of Material Disclosure

Clarification on Reassessment Under Section 148: Importance of Material Disclosure

Date: Jan 19, 2016
Clarification on Reassessment Under Section 148: Importance of Material Disclosure Introduction The case of Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...
Karnataka High Court Upholds Panchayat Seat Reservation Practices

Karnataka High Court Upholds Panchayat Seat Reservation Practices

Date: Jan 19, 2016
Karnataka High Court Upholds Panchayat Seat Reservation Practices Introduction The case S.T. Krishnegowda v. The State Of Karnataka, Department Of Panchayat Raj And Rural Development And Others was...
Delhi High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act

Delhi High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Jan 16, 2016
Delhi High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority for Reopening Assessments under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act Introduction In the landmark case of Dushyant Kumar Jain v. Deputy Commissioner...
Reassessing Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Sumati Nath Jain v. State Of U.P.

Reassessing Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Sumati Nath Jain v. State Of U.P.

Date: Jan 15, 2016
Reassessing Stamp Duty Assessments: Insights from Sumati Nath Jain v. State Of U.P. Introduction The case of Sumati Nath Jain v. State Of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary (Stamp And Revenue),...
Yum Restaurants (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer: Redefining Transfer Pricing for AMP Expenses

Yum Restaurants (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer: Redefining Transfer Pricing for AMP Expenses

Date: Jan 14, 2016
Yum Restaurants (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer: Redefining Transfer Pricing for AMP Expenses Introduction The case of Yum Restaurants (India) Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer...
Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 80-IB: Exclusion of Duty Drawback Benefits from Eligible Business Income

Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 80-IB: Exclusion of Duty Drawback Benefits from Eligible Business Income

Date: Jan 13, 2016
Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Ruling on Section 80-IB: Exclusion of Duty Drawback Benefits from Eligible Business Income Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Garment Crafts...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert