Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Harish Chander Lucktoo v. STATE OF HP

Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Harish Chander Lucktoo v. STATE OF HP

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Harish Chander Lucktoo v. STATE OF H.P. Introduction The case of Harish Chander Lucktoo v. STATE OF H.P. was adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh High Court on...
Judicial Review in Electoral Matters: Insights from Hirmu Devi v. STATE OF HP

Judicial Review in Electoral Matters: Insights from Hirmu Devi v. STATE OF HP

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Judicial Review in Electoral Matters: Insights from Hirmu Devi v. STATE OF HP Introduction The case of Hirmu Devi v. STATE OF HP adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh High Court on December 15, 2015,...
Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy over Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters

Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy over Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy over Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters Introduction The case of Shamshad Ali v. STATE OF HP adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh High Court on December...
Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Court of Himachal Pradesh Restricts Judicial Review in Panchayat Elections

Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Court of Himachal Pradesh Restricts Judicial Review in Panchayat Elections

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Court of Himachal Pradesh Restricts Judicial Review in Panchayat Elections Introduction The case of Kamal Nayan v. State of Himachal Pradesh was adjudicated by the...
Limits on Judicial Review under Article 243-O: Ramesh Bhau v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2015)

Limits on Judicial Review under Article 243-O: Ramesh Bhau v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2015)

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Limits on Judicial Review under Article 243-O: Ramesh Bhau v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2015) Introduction The case of Ramesh Bhau v. State of Himachal Pradesh ([2015] Himachal Pradesh High Court)...
Limitation of High Court’s Jurisdiction under Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters: Insights from Ram Parkash Patial v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Limitation of High Court’s Jurisdiction under Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters: Insights from Ram Parkash Patial v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Limitation of High Court’s Jurisdiction under Article 226 in Panchayat Election Matters: Insights from Ram Parkash Patial v. State of Himachal Pradesh Introduction The case of Ram Parkash Patial v....
Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Insights from Man Mohan Gupta v. State of H.P.

Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Insights from Man Mohan Gupta v. State of H.P.

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Judicial Restraint in Electoral Matters: Insights from Man Mohan Gupta v. State of Himachal Pradesh Introduction The case of Man Mohan Gupta v. State of Himachal Pradesh presented before the Himachal...
Reaffirmation of Constitutional Bar on Judicial Interference in Panchayat Elections: Gram Panchayat Ustehad v. STATE OF HP

Reaffirmation of Constitutional Bar on Judicial Interference in Panchayat Elections: Gram Panchayat Ustehad v. STATE OF HP

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Reaffirmation of Constitutional Bar on Judicial Interference in Panchayat Elections: Gram Panchayat Ustehad v. STATE OF HP Introduction The case of Gram Panchayat Ustehad v. STATE OF HP was...
Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: Courts' Limited Jurisdiction in Panchayat Election Matters

Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: Courts' Limited Jurisdiction in Panchayat Election Matters

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: Courts' Limited Jurisdiction in Panchayat Election Matters Introduction The case of Dr. Sushant Deshta v. State of Himachal Pradesh adjudicated by the Himachal Pradesh...
Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Bar on Interference in Panchayati Raj Elections

Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Bar on Interference in Panchayati Raj Elections

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Affirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Bar on Interference in Panchayati Raj Elections Introduction The case of Daulat Singh Thakur v. State of Himachal Pradesh consolidated CWP No. 4366 of 2015...
Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Non-Interference in Panchayat Electoral Matters

Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Non-Interference in Panchayat Electoral Matters

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Reaffirmation of Article 243-O: High Courts' Non-Interference in Panchayat Electoral Matters Introduction The case of Pawan Kumar Chandel v. State of Himachal Pradesh (CWP No. 4366 of 2015)...
Inclusive Interpretation of Section 11 for Statutory Authorities: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Bagalkot Town Development Authority

Inclusive Interpretation of Section 11 for Statutory Authorities: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Bagalkot Town Development Authority

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Inclusive Interpretation of Section 11 for Statutory Authorities: Karnataka High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Bagalkot Town Development Authority Introduction The case of The...
Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Article 243-O: Limiting Judicial Review in Panchayat Electoral Matters

Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Article 243-O: Limiting Judicial Review in Panchayat Electoral Matters

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Article 243-O: Limiting Judicial Review in Panchayat Electoral Matters Introduction The case of Col. Daulat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy Over Article 226 in Panchayat Raj Election Matters

Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy Over Article 226 in Panchayat Raj Election Matters

Date: Dec 16, 2015
Affirmation of Article 243-O's Supremacy Over Article 226 in Panchayat Raj Election Matters Introduction Case Title: Gaurav v. The Additional Chief Secretary (Urban Development) Court: Himachal...
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Landmark Judgment on Transfer Pricing Adjustments for AMP Expenses

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Landmark Judgment on Transfer Pricing Adjustments for AMP Expenses

Date: Dec 12, 2015
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Landmark Judgment on Transfer Pricing Adjustments for AMP Expenses Introduction The case of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (MSIL) v. Commissioner Of...
Delhi High Court Establishes Protections Against Coercive Insurance Settlement Practices

Delhi High Court Establishes Protections Against Coercive Insurance Settlement Practices

Date: Dec 12, 2015
Delhi High Court Establishes Protections Against Coercive Insurance Settlement Practices Introduction In the landmark case of Worldfa Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., adjudicated...
Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd. v. Nisha: High Court Upholds Limited Judicial Intervention in SARFAESI Proceedings

Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd. v. Nisha: High Court Upholds Limited Judicial Intervention in SARFAESI Proceedings

Date: Dec 10, 2015
Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd. v. Nisha: High Court Upholds Limited Judicial Intervention in SARFAESI Proceedings Introduction The case of Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Limited v. Nisha...
Assam Roofing Ltd. v. JSB Cement LLP: Landmark Decision on Trademark Infringement and Passing Off

Assam Roofing Ltd. v. JSB Cement LLP: Landmark Decision on Trademark Infringement and Passing Off

Date: Dec 10, 2015
Assam Roofing Ltd. v. JSB Cement LLP: Landmark Decision on Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Introduction The case of Assam Roofing Ltd. & Anr. v. JSB Cement LLP & Anr. adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Necessity of a Tamper-Proof Evidence Chain: Insights from Viswanadhan v. State Of Kerala

Establishing the Necessity of a Tamper-Proof Evidence Chain: Insights from Viswanadhan v. State Of Kerala

Date: Dec 10, 2015
Establishing the Necessity of a Tamper-Proof Evidence Chain: Insights from Viswanadhan v. State Of Kerala 1. Introduction The landmark case of Viswanadhan v. State Of Kerala, adjudicated by the...
Exclusion of Settlement Talks from Filing Deadlines under Commercial Courts Ordinance: Ericsson v. Lava International Limited

Exclusion of Settlement Talks from Filing Deadlines under Commercial Courts Ordinance: Ericsson v. Lava International Limited

Date: Dec 10, 2015
Exclusion of Settlement Talks from Filing Deadlines under Commercial Courts Ordinance: Ericsson v. Lava International Limited Introduction In the landmark case of Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert